Military-Industrial-Congressional Complex Endangers USA

In fact, the destruction of America’s once vibrant military and commercial industrial capacity in many sectors has become the single biggest unacknowledged threat to our national security. Because of public policies focused on finance instead of production, the United States increasingly cannot produce or maintain vital systems upon which our economy, our military, and our allies rely.

In some cases, our competitive edge has not just been eroded, but is at risk of being—or already is—surpassed. The Chinese surge in 5G telecom equipment, which has dual civilian and military uses, is one example. China is making key investments in artificial intelligence

Wall Street, and its pressure on executives to make decisions designed to impress financial markets, rather than for the long-term health of their companies.

First, in the 1980s and 1990s, Wall Street financiers focused on short-term profits, market power, and executive pay-outs over core competencies like research and production, often rolling an industry up into a monopoly producer. Then, in the 2000s, they offshored production to the lowest cost producer. This finance-centric approach opened the door to the Chinese government’s ability to strategically pick off industrial capacity by subsidizing its producers. Hand over cash to Wall Street, and China could get the American crown jewels.

The loss of manufacturing capacity has been devastating for American research capacity. “Innovation doesn’t just hover above the Great Plains,” Mottl said. “It is built on steady incremental changes and knowledge learned out of basic manufacturing.”

The United States has, for instance, lost much of its fasteners and casting industries, which are key inputs to virtually every industrial product. It has lost much of its capacity in grain oriented flat-rolled electrical steel, a specialized metal required for highly efficient electrical motors. Aluminum that goes into American aircraft carriers now often comes from China.

the United States no longer has the capacity to do high quality castings

***This shift happened because Wall Street, or “the LBO (leveraged buy-out) guys” as Hickey put it, bought up manufacturing facilities in the 1990s and moved them to China. ***

“The middle-class Americans who did the manufacturing work, all that capability, machine tools, knowledge, it just became worthless

Our policy empowering Wall Street and offshoring has also damaged the more specialized defense base, which directly produces weaponry and equipment for the military.

How pervasive is the loss of such capacity? In September 2018, the Department of Defense released findings of its analysis into its supply chain. The results highlighted how fragile our ability to supply our own military has become.

Stoller and Kunce’s conclusion:

In short, the financial industry, with its emphasis on short-term profit and monopoly, and its willingness to ignore national security for profit, has warped our very ability to defend ourselves.

The US failure to produce adequate amounts of munitions and weaponry for Ukraine demonstrates that fact.

An investment suggestion:TDG
TDG buys up companies that are sole or single-source suppliers of obscure airplane parts that the government needs. Then bumps the price up 8 to 10 times. It’s gross margins are both of 50%. And the military must pay the ransom.

Much more at the link above.

7 Likes

So…what do do about it? Domestic content legislation? Protectionist tariffs? The recent “solution” has been for the government to pay the “JCs” vast amounts of money to locate production in the US.

Steve

1 Like

SpaceX can provide the rockets and the satellites. Tesla could provide a military version of CyberTruck and X could replace Military Intelligence.

Renewal!

The Captain

Just what I want. A Corporation running the military. What could go wrong?

7 Likes

Are you suggesting that the US militsry is vertically integrated, builds all their stuff themselves, and has no corporate suppliers?

The Captain

No I am saying that the Military has a chain of command and Corporations should not be in the chain. Of course they are suppliers but I also do not want them running Military Intelligence although I am sure there are contractors working for them.

2 Likes

They used to be . Many navy ships were built in navy yards. The big guns were built in the naval gun factory. Army small arms were built at the Springfield Armory. But, ideology says everything must be privatized, so the US military is no longer vertically integrated, but a slave to it’s contractors.

Steve

9 Likes

Agree but the military could get new and more efficient suppliers to replace the old ones that are failing to deliver the goods at reasonable prices.

Privatizing has its pros and cons. In Venezuela the telephone system was vastly improved by it. On the con side privatizing led the way to the destruction of Venezuela’s democracy.

These darn pesky unintended consequences are real Black Swans.

The Captain

o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o

Business Week published an article about “the best quality services available in the U. S.” which missed two of them so I them a letter:

Letter to The Business Week Editor
January 13, 1992

You missed two quality services available in the U. S.: the telephone and the Postal Service (‘‘The Quality Imperative,’’ Special Issue, Oct. 25). If defects are to be measured as bad connections per million calls made or pieces not delivered per million pieces mailed, then both are tops. Telephones and mail boxes are available everywhere. Both services are inexpensive – what else can you get for the 29¢ cost of a first-class stamp or the 25¢ cost of a local call?

In the U. S., most people place their own calls. Phone service in Venezuela is so bad that executives have a secretary to make phone calls. This introduces extra people in the process, and a lot of time is wasted until both executives finally get on the line. This alone must cost Venezuela thousands of wasted man-hours.

In the U. S., millions of bills (for telephone, gas, electricity, credit cards, water, BUSINESS WEEK, etc.) are delivered and paid by mail. In Venezuela, no one dares put a check in the mail. Consequently, payments are made in person, and, again, thousands of man-hours are wasted.

In the U. S., the telephone and the Postal Service are marketing tools (telemarketing, junk mail). The telephone supports other services such as E-mail, fax, 800 and 900 numbers, and emergency (911) services. It is so good and so transparent that your writers didn’t even think about it (except for the software glitch that paralyzed the system for a few hours). The good news is that Venezuela just sold 40% of its state-owned telephone system to a private group headed by GTE.

Denny Schlesinger
Caracas

3 Likes

That would be great, or maybe just try them for fraud when it is perpetrated.

Could you explain how that worked? Why would that destroy democracy.

There are clowns in the United States that want to Privatize the Postal service. They think it is inefficient, even when you prove to them it isn’t.

3 Likes

It was not from A to B, it was a much longer chain.

I’ve commented that one cannot transfer technology without adapting it to the receiving country. With the fall of the Soviet Union how well did privatization work out? A few powerful people, now known as oligarchs, bought up all the state enterprises at pennies on the dollar. That explains why lots or Russoans were not impressed by democracy and wanted to go back to communism (something I didn’t understand at the time).

In Venezuela the people were not warned about the disruptions privatization and the elimination of price control would bring Some Chinese businesses lowered prices! I tried to explain to a neighbour that without price controls one needed to shop around to ger the best price. She complained that it was too much work to do so.

CAP (the president) wanted to accelerate improving the economy and requested extraordinary powers to do so. The Congress gave the powers, abdicated its function of checks and balances, and effectively went on vacation. It was the time when you people had Iran-Contra affair and suspended aid to Nicaragua. CAP used “black funds” to aid President Violeta Chamorro. (“Black funds” are like slush funds but they are legal. The president does not have to disclose their uae). Around that time there were popular uprisings about the economy including the attempted coup by Hugo Chavez. Rafael Caldera, the leader of the opposition Social Democrats (COPEY) did all he could to dethrone CAP which was achieved by trumped up charges based on the use of the black fund. From then on the Venezuelan economy and democracy were in free-fall which got Hugo Chavez elected with a 70% of the vote.

Unintended consequences on steroids.

The Captain

1 Like

That makes sense. Not a well thought out plan but throw it to the wolves.

2 Likes

Not if the “right” Congressmen and Senators have been bought & paid for.

intercst

3 Likes

Money is very democratic!

It pays for lots of votes.

The Captain

Especially when the highest court in the land declares bribery legal. Anyone surprised? Anyone?

Steve

3 Likes

And as we saw in Iraq and Afghanistan, even some of the fighting is outsourced to mercenaries, err, contractors.

1 Like