Duh. It went that way after Friday, but we had gone from 1 distribution day (in the last 25 trading days) to 4 before that. I think we could all feel that the down days were a little bigger and more frequent before Friday. We are now at 6 dist days on the Naz and I was surprised they did not call a correction today. Looks like Dow futures are down 1000 for tomorrow, if that sticks, they have to call it.
By IBD rules, you are buying growth stocks on breakouts and you are supposed to limit losses to 7-8%, but on a day like this you can’t do that, you blink and it is too late. Put in stop losses and a true flash crash stops you out at possibly horrible prices only to see a bounce back. This is a great weakness in their approach, that and normal human weaknesses that make you voilate the rules.
But being 100% invested like Saul can also really test your mettle. Tomorrow will too.
I usually only listen to Cramer on days like this, and he is good on these days. Look for stocks that reported great earnings and were even up on Friday against the tide - look to buy this on furhter dips (e.g DATA). He points out that some of these crazy ETF and tools like the XVIX (2xInverse XIV) can cause crazy imbalances and combined with computer trading the market “breaks”. At one point the XIV went by on the ticker as down about $100 to aroud $10. That is tied to stocks in a way and can really mess with computer algorithms.
Some of the stocks from this board have done GREAT relatively speaking, here are Saul’s holdings as of end of Jan:
http://stockcharts.com/freecharts/candleglance.html?TOP:,SHO…
http://stockcharts.com/freecharts/candleglance.html?MIDD:,TL…
http://stockcharts.com/freecharts/candleglance.html?SMALL:,P…
In particular, ANET has had a great run but not much of a sell off $290 to $260 - 10%. A bet Saul sold some to buy bargains, but it held so strong it shows the big boys are not sell as much as you would think, so it looks like a great stock to own.
Shop from a high of $130 to $118, not bad. Sure it hurts, but there are a lot of stocks out there that are hurt much worse.
From the article today…
Extreme levels of fear usually are a sign of a near-term low. We’ve seen unusually low readings in the last couple of years. So the injection of fear was not unexpected. The question is where does it usually go from here?
Looking at a few dates with high fear spikes:
The flash crash on May 6, 2010: After a quick rebound, the market weakened again over the next three months before starting a powerful rally on Sept. 1, 2010.
What usually happens when a near-term bottom is made and after some choppy action, a rally of 10% or more ensues. That was the case on Aug. 24, 2015, where a mini-flash crash put an already weak market into a dive. That was the bottom of a 12.5% correction in the market. There was some choppy action for the next five weeks before a rally of over 10%.
In August 2011, fears of global recession led to a spike in the VIX. A near-term bottom was made but undercut two months later after choppy action. The market quickly rebounded and started a powerful rally into the first quarter of 2012.
On Feb. 27, 2007, Shanghai started a domino effect in world markets that dropped U.S. indexes more than 3%. The index drifted slightly lower the next couple weeks before starting a rally of more than 10%.
Most recently you had a dose of fear in a very short-lived pullback after the vote to end Britain’s membership in the European Union. The correction lasted all of two days before a powerful rebound.
Meanwhile, the put/call volume ratio, a contrarian market indicator, notched readings of 0.97 on Friday and 1.10 on Monday. When investors are buying more bearish puts than calls in the options market, readings of 1.15 or higher indicate excessive fear and have been seen near market bottoms in the past
*Remember our recent discussion on buying puts as insurance? Still worried about them being a wasting asset?