I’m a big fan (and owner) of the Peloton bike and can’t argue with the tremendous unit economics and growth so I own a small position in the stock as well.
However, I have one main concern with Peloton’s business model. Since Echelon or Schwinn can’t compete on content because of Peloton’s economies of scale, they may want to open up their ecosystem to integrate with third-party content providers. Eventually, more and more content providers will enter the market like in streaming. Apple has been moderately successful in music streaming, although Spotify has more personalized content, better podcasts, some people prefer the UI, etc. the core content is the same. It’s different with Apple TV+ because the content is highly differentiated. I think fitness content fits between the two. People may have an attachment to some instructors and larger services can offer more frequent and a wider variety of classes but the core content is pretty similar. Apple also already has the tracks and integrations and could pay a lot for the same great instructors.
This has parallels with the dynamics between Roku and Netflix: https://twitter.com/ericstromberg/status/1309208260591919105…
People say that Netflix has power over Roku because you wouldn’t buy Roku if it didn’t have Netflix but over time, content is only going to proliferate. Netflix needs to be Roku otherwise Disney+ is going to steal market share. And why wouldn’t it want to be on Roku? If it’s a concern about Roku getting too big and they move off the platform, then the next cheapest platform (Fire TV) is going to gain market share and then they would be faced with the same problem. So, content providers will inevitably lose leverage over time to the hardware providers (or demand aggregators).
What does this mean for Peloton? Well if the content becomes commoditized, then there is no need to pay for the higher priced bike. One can expect that over time the value of third party content >= Peloton’s proprietary content. And if no one buys the expensive bikes, then Peloton won’t be able to make money off the content because third-party hardware providers that compete with Peloton too don’t want or need Peloton on their bikes. There are a number of caveats including the premium brand, the established community, and gamification (Leaderboard) but I don’t think that warrants the significant premium they charge on the bike. They can also open up the platform to third-party content providers as this tweet suggests: https://twitter.com/ericstromberg/status/1313537578767917058…
This doesn’t mean I would sell Peloton but I also would be very cautious about making it a larger position.