Reflections on investing (reprise)

Reflections on investing

A year ago this month, I was not satisfied at all with my recent results from 2016, so I decided to do some reflection and reevaluation. It seemed to have worked. Here’s what I wrote then, slightly edited, with some current reflections on those reflections:

I’m not content with my recent results (2016, and 2014, for example), and I am trying to reflect, reevaluate, and better understand what went on, with an eye especially towards what can I do to improve? The thoughts I will express below probably won’t all stick together, and some thoughts may conflict with, or contradict, others, but so be it. They come from different directions

First reflection:
What happened in 2016? The beaten down oil and commodity stocks made a comeback throughout the year, and especially as the incoming President promised infrastructure spending and support for fossil fuel industries. I don’t usually invest in oil or commodity stocks, and it wasn’t my kind of market. Growth stocks were not the number one priority of the market in 2016.

What can I do about it? Not much. There will be some years that value stocks and cyclicals do better than growth stocks, but it’s not in my nature to invest in value stocks, hoping for a turn-around, or to invest on the basis of trying to guess cyclical patterns.

Second reflection:
At the end of the first week of August, 2015, I was up over 51% for the year, well on the way to a year similar to my best historical years. However, I finished the year only up 16%. That was still a lot better than the indexes, but it represented a drop of over 23% of my portfolio value from August to the end of December nevertheless.

What happened? The S&P only dropped a few percent from that date to the end of the year, so it wasn’t due to a big market move. What happened was that a number of my stocks that I had major positions in crashed or semi-crashed. These included Infinera, Skyworks, and Skechers. One thing especially troubled me: These companies had been rapidly growing, and management had kept telling us that all was well, and that they had plenty of visibility into the future and it looked bright, and then the stocks crashed, not because they had been too high in price (their PE’s had been reasonable to low), but because business results tumbled suddenly and unexpectedly.

What did I learn from this? First of all, to avoid companies that sell bits of hardware to a limited number of large customers! Even though Skyworks said it could see years into the future, obviously it couldn’t. Even though Infinera said it had the world by the tail, it didn’t. Neither had any guaranteed recurring income. Even management couldn’t tell what was going to happen. I don’t think they were lying outright to us. I think they really probably believed what they were saying. Maybe it was partly wishful thinking, but they both believed what they were saying.

Second, I learned again to avoid clothing retail. Also to pay attention! When I bought a pair of shoes at a big Skechers store a year or so ago, and they gave me 40% off if I would buy three pairs, I should have sold out of my position, or at least seriously worried, instead of thinking that they were just silly employees who were giving me a bargain.

[Writing now in 2018, I’d say that what I had learned worked. Most of my current stocks have significant “guaranteed” recurring income, and you won’t see any brick and mortar retail stocks in my portfolio.]

Third Reflection:
Was there a problem, as some people have suggested, due to my having to post what I am doing, and having to give a rationale for it, that I didn’t have to do before I started the board? In other words, did having the board affect my judgment in a negative way?

I don’t think so. If there was, I doubt that I could have been up that 51% in 2015 in just seven months plus. Also, I don’t feel inhibited in my decisions. I do what I feel is correct, and if people disagree, I’m fine with that.

Is there anything to do about it? Nope. I like what I’m doing with this board. [Writing now: and I couldn’t have had the results I had in 2017 if my decisions were hampered.]

Fourth reflection:
Changes in the market: There are a lot fewer underfollowed and mispriced stocks than there were 20 years ago!

Why? Information wasn’t readily available then. Twenty years ago if you wanted a stock quote, you looked in the physical NY Times newspaper in the morning and looked through all the stock quotes from the day before to see high, low, close, and volume on your stocks. Not much effective internet. If you wanted an intraday quote you called your broker. (Spreads were often a quarter or a half a point, by the way, and commissions were 1% or so. That means $100 commission on 1000 shares of a $10 dollar stock. Now you’ll pay perhaps $4 to $7 on the same trade). You weren’t invited to conference calls. There often weren’t even recordings, and never transcripts. You were entirely dependent on your full service broker – who got his information from his company’s analysts, who may or may not have listened to the conference call. I don’t even remember ever seeing earnings press releases like we have now. Where would you look for them with no internet? Now, information is everywhere, and it’s much, much harder to have an edge on a stock.

What to do about it? Nothing. It’s a lot better in general. A lot better! I’d rather be fully informed.

Fifth reflection:
I can no longer invest in microcaps or illiquid stocks. Look, I’m investing many times, perhaps twenty times, what I was investing twenty years ago. I guess I could slowly work into a position in an illiquid stock, but the problem is how would I get out in a hurry if there was bad news? I’d be locked in. Not a good place to be.

What can I do about it? Live with it! I much prefer having the additional money to invest.

Sixth reflection:
Listening to everyone talking about the Internet Bubble made me wonder how much of my success was due to my one extraordinary decision to sell out of my internet stocks at what turned out to be the top of the bubble, or close to it. This resulted in me making a gain of over 115% in 1999, and then, in 2000, when everyone who held their internet stocks, or added to them on the decline, had huge losses, I was up 19%. The indexes were down, as well, of course.

This certainly helped my overall results. However, I did make that decision, and immediately acted on it. That’s one of the cornerstones of my investing style: to be willing to change my mind and sell. (Amazon, AOL, and Yahoo, which were the darlings of the Bubble, lost 90% to 95% of their value. Amazon came back, but it took ten years. It’s now way above where it had been. Yahoo and AOL never came back. [Writing now in 2018, I have to say that being willing to sell positions where the story has changed is crucial to my success. In the bubble I sold stocks that went up irrationally, but the other kind of selling is even more important. I still see people who’ve held on, and held on, for years, while the stock stagnates or keeps dropping, tying up their money while it shrinks, because they don’t want to admit a change or a mistake, and take a loss.]

This was the Bubble when supposedly “great analysts” said things like “This stock is at 200 times revenue, but comparables are at 400 times, so it’s a bargain”.

Seventh reflection:
Have I made incremental small changes in my investing style over the years that have changed my results? I don’t know. It’s hard to remember exactly what I was doing 10 or 15 years ago. I am trying to cut down the number of stocks in my portfolio though, to make it closer to the streamlined version it was then. [Writing now, in 2018, I think that reducing the number of stocks in my portfolio to closer to what it was in the past, was a crucial change, and that it was reflected in my 2017 results, concentrating my portfolio to my best picks, and making it much easier to follow them].

Eighth reflection:
One more point. There are now people from all over the globe investing in the US markets. Everyone wants to invest in the strongest most stable economy and currency. [Writing now: Maybe a little less now.] That also makes undervalued stocks harder to find in our markets.

And:
In conclusion, I’d say that reducing the number of my positions was the most important change. Buying companies with recurring revenue was also important, as was avoiding retail companies, and trying to avoid any with a few customers who were responsible for the majority of their revenue.

I’d be glad to hear other ideas from others on the board. And best to you all, and may we all do well.

Saul

For Knowledgebase for this board,
please go to Post #17774, 17775 and 17776.
We had to post it in three parts this time.

A link to the Knowledgebase is also at the top of the Announcements column
on the right side of every page on this board

128 Likes

Saul, this is one of the best posts that I have read of yours and humbly suggest it’s added to the knowledgebase.

1 Like

Thanks, Branmin. A lot of the thoughts come from the Knowledgebase.
Saul

I’d be glad to hear other ideas from others on the board. And best to you all, and may we all do well.

Saul

Thanks for the refections. I have three comments:

First of all, to avoid companies that sell bits of hardware to a limited number of large customers!

Absolutely. With a few large customers the company does not have pricing power and also at risk if any one of them goes broke. It’s one of the reasons I decided to trim The Trade Desk after hearing Jeff Green’s Foolish interview.

Second, I learned again to avoid clothing retail.

Not all retail are created equal. At this time Ross Stores and to a lesser extent T. J. Maxx are doing very well unlike most other retail. Why? Because there are more poor people than rich. The retail to avoid are the “consumer discretionary” ones. Off price retail and dollar stores are the exception.

Ross Stores (ROST), 30 years of 22% growth

https://invest.kleinnet.com/bmw1/stats30/ROST.html

That’s one of the cornerstones of my investing style: to be willing to change my mind and sell.

Yes, rather late in my investment life have I learned that holding on to losing positions waiting for the rebound is very, very expensive, specially with a concentrated portfolio. Diversification hides it.

With my best wishes for a wealthy-healthy 2018!

Denny Schlesinger

24 Likes

Thanks Saul,
You and this board has helped in raising my willingness to look into stocks and spend the time to do it. You and all( that includes all the people that post on this board) have helped me to start improving my returns. Yes I know every year won’t be like 2017 but my first year of investing outside of a 401k was early 2007. Yes I lost 50% but I stuck with my stocks and recovered. It taught me to stay in the game
no matter what. I still work full time and have a child at home so time is rough to come by, but hoping soon to bring ideas to this board and help others benefit from this great board!
Thanks to everyone that posts on this board!!

Paul

5 Likes

“avoid clothing retail.” I now avoid all retail because I will be one of the last ones to know what is “in” and what is “out” I have to rely on my 25 year old granddaughter…
There are plenty of other places to invest

Selling is always harder than buying, we were leaning toward optimism or we would not have bought it in the first place. Changing your mind is always a bit hard to do.
“waiting for a rebound” agree mostly not a good idea, turn rounds often don’t. The exception might be if you see an intact business plan. I know I have a short list of companies that I will consider buying only deep in a recession.

Re Ross Stores , what would have lead one to invest in this company a decade ago? What was different?

1 Like

Re Ross Stores , what would have lead one to invest in this company a decade ago? What was different?

20% growth rate? Nothing different, just the same growth rate. I was in California from 1985 to 1990 and I used to shop at Ross Stores for Oxford button down shirts. On every visit I would find two or three. They had lots of stores all over the place and when I saw one I’d look in. Same shirts as at more and much more expensive department stores. The advantage of the department stores was larger assortment and well organized shelves. The advantage of Ross Stores was affordability. Like I said, there are more poor people than rich.

Do some comparison investigating, which is the better investment, MacDonald’s or some high flying steak house like Outback or Red Lobster? Which airlines make more money, deep discount like RyanAir and Southwest or American?

A decade ago Ross Stores had 20 years of fast growth.

I now avoid all retail because I will be one of the last ones to know what is “in” and what is “out” I have to rely on my 25 year old granddaughter…

At Ross Stores affordable prices are IN and never go OUT of style. :wink:

Denny Schlesinger

5 Likes

First, thank you Saul most sincerely for being so generous with your time and being so ready to share your thoughts on investment matters. I have read like a glutton EVERY POST you have written in the last 3 years or so, and have tried to formulate a set of rules that I could use myself in my own investments. Like you I did suffer significant losses due to investing in the stocks which were very popular in 2015 and 2016 and am therefore very interested in your observations in this post.

As you said you learned your lessons from the relative underperformance of your investments in 2016 and used them in 2017 which led to the fantastic performance.

  • You have categorically said you invest only in growth stocks, not in value stocks or cyclical stocks.
  • You avoid microcaps or illiquid stocks and retail companies.
  • You also avoid companies with few customers who are responsible for the majority of their revenues.
  • You strongly believe that reducing the number of positions led to the success in 2017.

If someone wishes to construct a portfolio today based your observations, not necessarily consisting of just a few stocks to start with, then what other critera has he/she to use to arrive at a reasonable list? What about eps growth, revenue growth, profit margin, ROE, debt/equity ratio etc - the critera very often used by financial advisors.This is to explore an alternative to just following what you or other regular and successful investors on this board have in your portfolios. Such independently screened portfolio is likely to include many of the stocks discussed here but may also identify new candidates.

I hope like me many other readers of this Board will benefit from what you may be able to add in reply to my query.

Regards.
alpha

6 Likes

- You have categorically said you invest only in growth stocks, not in value stocks or cyclical stocks.
- You avoid microcaps or illiquid stocks and retail companies.
- You also avoid companies with few customers who are responsible for the majority of their revenues.
- You strongly believe that reducing the number of positions led to the success in 2017.

If someone wishes to construct a portfolio today based your observations, not necessarily consisting of just a few stocks to start with, then what other critera has he/she to use to arrive at a reasonable list? What about eps growth, revenue growth, profit margin, ROE, debt/equity ratio etc

Hi alpha, not to be critical, but if you are trying to follow this board without reading the Knowledgebase, it’s like playing with one arm tied behind your back.

I’ve always only invested in growth stocks.
I’ve been forced into avoiding microcaps and illiquid stocks.
Avoiding retail and companies with just a few large customers were new restrictions on added in 2017.
I’ve always preached a small number of stocks, but I had drifted up to 20-25 positions as my portfolio grew in size, and it was a mistake.

All the rest of my requirements are well discussed in the Knowledgebase: such as recurring revenue, revenue growth, etc, although recently I have bought more stocks not yet profitable if they are growing fast enough.

Saul

10 Likes

I don’t recall exactly when I stumbled across this board, but it was pretty early on. Actually, as a Fool I was already familiar with and impressed by Saul. I had read a post authored by him on some other board (long since forgotten) which impressed me.

As for my investment strategy and performance, I started trying use Saul’s methods in 2015 (I think). But I hadn’t fully bought in. I was still more in the grasp of “buy and hold” come what may. I also held small positions in a lot of companies. I seldom added to my winners, rather I would look for something new to buy. Due to a mishap with my computer, I lost my records. I also had my investments spread across four brokerage firms (I thought I had a good reason at the time), including Edward Jones (I have nothing good to say about this company). Some of those records were also lost so I have no practical way of reconstructing my holdings and performance. But of this I’m certain, at best my returns were mediocre but it would not surprise me to determine I had lost money for the year.

By 2016 I had consolidated all my investments to one firm (Fidelity, no complaints). I hold three accounts, a revocable trust, a traditional IRA and a Roth IRA. This was the year I really began to try and implement Saul style investment in growth companies. Like Saul, I was not happy with my results. For the year, my performance summed across all three portfolios was a 7% loss. But for the first time in my life (I’ve dabbled at investing for many years) I actually knew what my performance was. I had never bothered to keep track of it before. I saw that I had room for improvement.

Last year, I was more diligent in my investment strategy. I was also not in the least reluctant to admit that I had made a mistake and sell. But even more to the point, I expanded my definition of “mistake” to include companies that may have been doing OK and had a rising stock price, but it was rising more slowly than other opportunities with little evidence that the company was going to improve. I sold stock in order to buy a different company or put more money in something I already owned that was performing better. Most of the year I held 15 or fewer different companies. I ended the year up a little better than 82%.

I still consider myself a newbie. I don’t have the same level of conviction in my investments that Saul has. I fail to recognise problems with a company as readily as Saul does. Saul has over 20 years of experience. I have maybe a year and a half. There’s no teacher like experience. Saul is often given credit for having something akin to a sixth sense about investing. I just think that’s what comes with 20 years of reasonably intensive study and experience. Intelligence and humility also play an important role. I’ve never read anything by Saul that displays a need to be right. Accepting that as a human we are prone to err is a valuable attitude as an investor.

2018 is off to a great start, but I keep admonishing my wife that she should not get too excited by the early performance. I’m pretty old, I don’t expect to see another year like 2017 again, ever. My goal, which I think is achievable is 20% annual gain. Anything over that is gravy. Although 2017 was more like steak, potatoes and gravy along with a nice red and maybe even a desert.

30 Likes

An excellent post, Saul!

I have to say that being willing to sell positions where the story has changed is crucial to my success.

This is particularly hard for me. The hard part isn’t selling; it’s detecting whether the story has changed in a meaningful way (as opposed to being just noise). And it’s why the “Saul method” doesn’t work well for me, at least right now.

Let me give some examples.

Chipotle

The first of the health problems. Had the story changed, or was it just a bad break? Sell or hold? I held because it seemed like bad luck, not a fundamental problem with the business. Then another problem. Starting to look like a pattern, which makes business problem look more likely; but I default to holding when I can’t tell.

It wasn’t until after Monty Moran (co-CEO) suddenly left without any explanation that it was clear to me that the story (the one I had invested in) had changed. I invested in Chipotle after seeing his interview with Tom Gardener. I was thoroughly impressed with his attitude and perspective. With him gone, my investing thesis had seriously changed. But it took me weeks (or maybe a couple of months?) before I consciously realized all this (to say in my head, “The thesis has changed!”). As soon as I realized, I sold.

Ubiquiti Networks

I had watched it a while, but the apparent commodity nature of its business, and frequently having product shortages, caused me to avoid investing. Then they hired a new CFO who got them to ramp up more on new products. They took a short-term hit for that expenditure, but were positioned to be able to fill demand. So I bought in.

Later, Saul starts to complain about the CEO paying more attention to his basketball team than Ubiqiuti, and being unable to answer some of the more detailed financial and inventory questions during conference calls, and sells. Has the story really changed? At the time, I was much less worried about the conference calls. Isn’t that the CEO’s job to hire good CFO and COO to take care of those details? Does the CEO really need to have all of that information on the tip of his tongue during a conference call? I held.

Later, that CFO left. Saul has been imploring people on the board to reconsider holding. Like Chipotle, it took me a while to consciously realize that the story I had invested in had meaningfully changed. When I did, I sold.

I have since reestablished a small position after buying and being impressed with their AmpliFi mesh WiFi router system. Adding the home networking market seems like a good move for longer term growth.

XPO Logistics

XPO was growing rapidly. Their multiples were high, but they appeared to deserve it. After the merger with Con-way, Saul became concerned about the business becoming more asset heavy (now owning a lot more trucks), and being evaluated more like a “big company” (and thus the market would become more skeptical of its high multiples). Saul sold. This was a big change, sure, but was it a bad one? I couldn’t tell, so I held.

The stock price dropped significantly. I think Saul missed most or all of that drop. I didn’t. I held. I’ll admit that I was worried. Was I blind to some important problem?

XPO sold off some of the less profitable parts of Con-way. The business continued to grow. The stock price eventually rebounded – vigorously. I’ve held the entire time. What started out as a small position has grown into a medium sized one, by virtue of the stock price growing faster than many of my other holdings. I’m glad I didn’t sell.

It seems that I’m sluggish to react compared to most people here. I think that’s another reason why Saul’s method isn’t as good a fit for me.

I’m much more comfortable with the Rule Breakers approach of picking a bunch of companies with opportunities to change their industry or the world. Pick enough of them so that you get a better chance to pick several of the winners-to-be. Don’t worry as much about ones where the stock price is losing; they’ll become irrelevant. Let the winners self-select and reveal themselves. This makes me much more relaxed, and able to stick with winners, even through hiccups. It fits me better emotionally.

I was up “only” 44% in 2017. Not nearly as impressive as many of the people here. I’m quite happy with it. Frankly, I only need to match S&P500 performance to have a high probability of a successful retirement. I’d like to do at least a little better to progressively improve our standard of living in retirement. If I can do a little better without a lot of stress, that would be much better for me than dramatically better returns with high stress.

-Mark
… who still really values the discussions here!

50 Likes

Mark,
XPO Logistics was my best performing stock in 2017. TMF podcast - Motley Fool Money mentioned CHRW (C.H. Robinson). They are a 3PL, meaning they gain a big portion of their revenue by providing logistics solutions through their software. Navisphere Vision is their newest solution. Might be something to explore.

2 Likes

Hi Mark,
I relate to a lot of what you said. Taking a very similar approach… I now have ~50 positions and with ~40% up in 2017, I couldn’t be more happy with the performance.

I am also thankful to Saul and many others on this board. Hugely benefitted this year from these discussions.

Nilvest

1 Like

Hi Mark,
I really liked your post. My extra problem is not knowing which RB stocks to invest.
Do you use some rules to pick your RB

Thanks Saul for all you do
usha

Hi Mark,
I really liked your post. My extra problem is not knowing which RB stocks to invest.
Do you use some rules to pick your RB

Thanks Saul for all you do
usha

Not Mark, but I’ll give you a quick run-down of part of my method. I subscribe to Rule Breakers and Stock Advisor (now Hidden Gems too). I look for carry-over recommendations between services (also factoring in discussions here on Saul’s board pretty prominently), and I pay particular attention to the Best Buys Now lists.

There is one particular company that I will not name in this posting out of respect for both The Motley Fools’ business and for paying members of the Motley Fools services, but will say it has been on both the December and January Best Buys Now lists for multiple services (January RB list is just out today, fyi). If you haven’t yet bought shares of that company or if you haven’t at least researched it a good bit already, you’re doing yourself at least a bit of a disservice.

5 Likes

volfan84,

I currently subscribe to PRO, MFO, SA & RB. I’m a former Duke Street/One subscriber. Before that, one of the individual services I subscribed to was HG (along with GG, PD and others).

HG (when Tom ran it) was great and I found BWLD, BABY and many others with that service.

My question is, what made you decide to add HG to your fold? And also, perhaps you can tell me what I may be missing with the 2018 version of HG (compared to the HG of 12-13 years or so ago).

I have been very happy with my SA/RB/PRO/MFO combination since I “downgraded” from One about 2.5 years ago.

– This…is the MaineReason

To be honest, the main reason (haha) that I joined HG was to be able to compete in all 3 2018 challenges. Also, it was only $53/year for 3 years, so really cheap if it gives me just 1 or 2 good picks. With its target of smaller cap companies, I could envision some picks being made there that could later “graduate” to being Rule Breakers or Stock Advisor picks. No Hidden Gems picks have jumped out as screaming buys for me yet, and I am performing very poorly in HG 2018 challenge (averaging -4% so far across 5 picks) after 7 days of the market being open in 2018.

So far, HG has yet come close to RB or SA from my opinion. The boards have much less traffic…and the first recommendation on there that jumped out at me that I hadn’t previously heard of has had a pretty salaciously-worded short attack already just this week (from Copperfield Research). Fortunately, I hadn’t already bought any shares in real life. I haven’t read the full report, but glancing at it was enough for me to push that company down from a 3.75 to a 3.25 out of 5 on my personal watch list rating system (Arista Networks is about a 4.5 or 4.75, presently, fwiw). 3.25 is basically not worth significant further research. The numbering is mostly arbitrary, from my brain pulling information from different places…doubt any company could get a 5, other than maybe NVDA circa CES 2017, but since I already owned NVDA and the system was less-refined than its still poorly-refined state, it didn’t have an up-to-date rating then.

1 Like

If anyone cares, here are the companies I am presently trying to decide between for starting new positions, and their associated rankings. I just threw Starbucks in there today after reading an example of what Altria shares with DRIPs would have done and seeing that Starbucks has right about a 2.0% dividend yield presently…SBUX isn’t much of a Saul-type stock or method though.

Present Rank (out of 5 stars) Symbol Company Name
4.00 TLND Talend
3.75 AYX Alteryx
3.75 APPN Appian
3.75 PSTG Pure Storage
3.75 SBUX Starbucks
3.75 ALRM Alarm.com
3.75 JUNO Juno Therapeutics
3.75 SWKS Skyworks Solutions
3.50 PAYC Paycom

Looking back on some prior ratings from my watch list, I see MELI as a 4.50 back when it was at a much lower price. Paypal and Starbucks were at 4.25…definitely should have bought some Paypal back then. Westlake Chemical was at a 3.75, that would have been a decent buy from the then-price. I had Western Refining as a 4.0, which is one that I actually did buy (then bought out in late-2016). Align Technologies at a 3.50 back then was a far-too-low rating, apparently. I had LGIH as a 4.0 last summer; I did dip my toe into LGIH via options, but it was right before Hurricane Harvey hit Houston, so that timing turned out to be very unfortunate for my portfolio.

Apologies for using this board as my personal reflection ground, but it aids in organizing some of my thoughts…and if you use any of my thoughts to make a buying decision, caveat emptor, of course.

2 Likes

There is one particular company that I will not name in this posting out of respect for both The Motley Fools’ business and for paying members of the Motley Fools services, but will say it has been on both the December and January Best Buys Now lists for multiple services (January RB list is just out today, fyi).

volfan, Is there some way to see the Best Buys for December? I only get the Best buys for January.
Saul

2 Likes

Is there some way to see the Best Buys for December? I only get the Best buys for January.

I don’t know about RB, but for SA, I just looked, and if you are on the best buys page

for subscribers https://www.fool.com/premium/stock-advisor/recommendations/b…

you can scroll down below the list and there are links to the previous months “Why These 5 Stocks Are David’s Best Buys Now” for David and Tom

-mekong

1 Like