Remember how the Fed has been vilified over the years, by certain factions?

Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson questioned Trump attorney D. John Sauer’s underlying assumption that official acts by a sitting president are immune from criminal prosecution while private acts are not.

That would not make sense. I would think the difference is who is in a position to hear the case. Ordinary courts in the case of private entities and Congress in the case of the president, specially about “official acts.”

I wonder if her question had any “English” on it.

The Captain

1 Like