ROOT Q3 2024 | Rooting less cautiously now

ROOT had a monster quarter as @stocknovice said in this post.

Here is the rundown:
Shareholder letter
ER

Results

  • Gross written premium was $332m, up 113% yoy and I expected $330m.

  • Gross premium earned was $317m, up 134% yoy and I expected $320m.

  • Revenue was $305.7m, up 165% yoy vs consensus expectations of $276m and my own expectation of $304m. So a huge top-line beat.

  • Net income was $21.7m which is a net income margin of 7% (!!! - see later).

  • EPS was $1.35 vs consensus of -$1.03. This was the biggest and most consequential beat.

How did they do it? Well the CFO summed it up best:

For the third quarter, we delivered net income of $23 million, a $69 million improvement year-over-year. Along with this milestone achievement, we generate an operating income of $34 million and adjusted EBITDA of $42 million, year-over-year improvements of $68 million and $61 million, respectively.

Our outstanding results continue to be driven primarily by growth in our net earned premium, loss ratio performance, closely managed expense base and the responsible deployment of marketing investment.

For me this quarter is huge because they’ve now proven the business model. The table below shows the net income margins of the past years, and this quarter was the inflection point.

NI % Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
2000 -85% -27% -169% -262%
2021 -145% -199% -142% -118%
2022 -91% -119% -90% -82%
2023 -58% -49% -40% -12%
2024 -2% -3% 7%

There is one more part of what the CFO stated above which needs unpacking and that is the loss ratio performance. That was also great, the CEO said in the call he believes it is industry leading:

And of course it all came together in the combined ratio which was just terrific.

Gross combined ratio Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
2021 156% 197% 173% 144%
2022 136% 152% 130% 132%
2023 123% 118% 119% 110%
2024 100% 100% 89%

Other bits and bobs
They generated a lot of operating cash flow, so this is not a case of cash-flow being somewhere in the future. OCF was $50m in the quarter.

They continue to grow their partnership channel, which has lower churn than their direct model, and it grew new writings 131% yoy, and now contributes 24% of new writings in the quarter vs 10% a year ago.

Also the CEO stated in the Q&A that each new cohort that they sign up has better churn dynamics that the one that went before, ex the impact of the better churn of the indirect channel.

They refinanced a term loan on 29 October, which will reduce their interest expense by 50% going forward.

Lastly they have a lot of runway for growth left via geo expansion and channel expansion, all while further improving their AI-led moat.

Share price reaction

It’s not often that I quote myself, but I’m making an exception on this one :wink:

@Fool4ZTribe said that he believed that 7% margin is the key, and I agreed.

I was saying if they can get to a 7% margin in 3 years, we have a potential 3-4 bagger on our hands. Well guess what? They hit that exact margin this quarter. I assumed they could eventually get there, but they just did it now!

Just on current EPS alone, the stock could easily run much more.

On a run-rate annualised basis based on Q3 Net Income (i.e. with no further growth or profitability improvements) the annualised net income is $86.8m. A modest PE of 15x on that gives a market cap of $1.3bn.

In post-market trading last night the stock was up 84%. That would imply a market cap of around $1.1bn if it settled there. We’ll have to see where it eventually lands.

The share price pop is not meme-like imo.

It is actually quite modest. And there could very well be much more in the tank.

-wsm.

18 Likes

These are really impressive results from ROOT. That was a good call noticing how undervalued it is.

My biggest concern with this company though is that insurance is absolutely booming right now and I’m not sure ROOT is not just benefitting from the cyclical trend. To provide some examples, here are the public insurers in the US that have revenue growth above 40% on the last quarter.

Name, Symbol, Revenue Growth yoy, net margin
Cincinnati Financial (CINF) - rev +83%, net margin 24%
RLI Corp (RLI) - rev +42%, net margin 20%
Lincoln Financial (LNC) - rev +56%, net margin 20%
Oscar Health (OSCR) - rev +56%, net margin 3%
Mercury General (MCY) - rev +44%, net margin 15%
Palomar Holdings (PLMR) - rev +45%, net margin 20%
HCI Group (HCI) - rev +62%, net margin 26%
Bowhead Specialty (BOW) - rev +51%, net margin 6%

Wondering if anybody on the board has insights as to why insurance companies are doing so well recently?

I have a small position in EverQuote (EVER) while I learn more about the industry. They work with referring clients to ROOT among others. Hoping they will also be a beneficiary from the industry trends.

12 Likes

Anyone who has recently renewed their auto and/or homeowners policies has seen great increases - 25-40% is common. Regulators have taken some time to approve requests for premium increases, but many are now approved. Some of this is the pendulum effect - from inadequate to overly sufficient.

2 Likes

“Wondering if anybody on the board has insights as to why insurance companies are doing so well recently?”

Perhaps it has to do with what @wsm007 said previously in his other recent post on $ROOT?

"They are seeing the opposite from what hit them in 2021/22. They are now seeing inflation come down vs their expectations when pricing the policy, resulting in lower costs on claims. I think this dynamic has some way to run still.

1 Like

Yes it’s both - lower inflation and higher pricing as @Fool4ZTribe said.

I’m simplifying but this is roughly how I have it:

2 years ago they priced at $100 and expected $90 as total claims cost and then inflation ended up way higher so that $90 turned into something like $100 for the same claims severity and incidence rates, so they made nothing on the underwriting, and then the cost of running the insurer still had to come off.

Now they are pricing at $120 and expecting $110 as total claims cost but that $110 turns out to be too high because inflation came down more and faster than they anticipated when pricing the policy, so claims costs are ending up at say $105 resulting in a nice underwriting profit of $120-$105 = $15 vs the expected $120-$110 = $10.

Anyhow, that’s how I have it.

For those who haven’t looked, the stock is up 174% !!! as of now. Haven’t quite seen anything like that before - certainly not on a stock that I was long on!

-wsm.

9 Likes

The $ROOT page on SeekingAlpha says 16% short. I know SA short% info isn’t all that up-to-date, but maybe part of today’s price action is due to a short-squeeze.

4 Likes