Russian war: trends and risks

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/28/opinion/putin-military-sa…

**Russia Is a Potemkin Superpower**
**By Paul Krugman, The New York Times, Feb. 28, 2022**

**...**
**I was being generous in describing Russia as even a medium-size power. Britain and France are medium-size powers; Russia’s gross domestic product is only a bit more than half as large as either’s. ...**

**Russia's standard of living is sustained by large imports of manufactured goods, mostly paid for via exports of oil and natural gas.**

**This leaves Russia’s economy highly vulnerable to sanctions that might disrupt this trade, a reality reflected in Monday’s sharp plunge in the value of the ruble despite a huge increase in domestic interest rates and draconian attempts to limit capital flight....**

**Before the invasion it was common to talk about how Putin had created “fortress Russia,” an economy immune to economic sanctions, by accumulating a huge war chest of foreign currency reserves. Now, however, such talk seems naïve. What, after all, are foreign reserves? They aren’t bags of cash. For the most part they consist of deposits in overseas banks and holdings of other governments’ debt — that is, assets that can be frozen if most of the world is united in revulsion against a rogue government’s military aggression....** [end quote]

Before the Russians invaded Ukraine, the financial markets were focused on the U.S. Federal Reserve, which announced its intention to begin tightening monetary conditions in March. Monetary tightening cycles are often followed by recession but the Fed is being forced to tighten by high inflation.

Even without the Ukraine invasion, supply chains have been slow to unsnarl themselves. The U.S. economy grew rapidly due to massive fiscal injections but the forecast has slowed dramatically. The Atlanta Fed’s GDPNow model estimate for real GDP growth (seasonally adjusted annual rate) in the first quarter of 2022 is 0.0 percent on March 1, down from 0.6 percent on February 25.
https://www.atlantafed.org/cqer/research/gdpnow

https://www.wsj.com/articles/ukraine-war-means-another-suppl…

**Ukraine War Means Another Supply Shock to Global Economy, the Last Thing It Needs**
**Shortages of oil, gas and other commodities will exacerbate inflation just as central banks are trying to tame it**
**by Jon Hilsenrath, The Wall Street Journal, 3/1/2022**

**Russia’s invasion of Ukraine threatens to restrict global energy supplies, with the resulting rise in oil and natural-gas prices likely to hit Europe hard and potentially ripple out to the U.S. and other global markets.**

**It’s the last thing the global economy needs: Another “supply shock,” or a sudden shortage of key products—in this case oil, natural gas and other commodities—that is likely to exacerbate a global inflation problem and make matters harder for the Federal Reserve and other central banks, which are trying to prevent consumer prices from rising out of control....**

**Russia is also a big player in global markets for copper, aluminum and palladium. Disruptions in Russia’s production or delivery of those products could throw off supply chains for catalytic converters in cars, capacitors used in cellphones and even dental crowns...The country is also a producer of urea and potash, components of fertilizer....**

**[https://www.wsj.com/articles/western-sanctions-bite-russian-...](https://www.wsj.com/articles/western-sanctions-bite-russian-economy-but-pose-unpredictable-risks-11646143908)**

**Western Sanctions Bite Russian Economy, But Pose Unpredictable Risks**
**Despite short-term recession and long-term harm, Russia’s behavior may not change, and Western governments face complex potential repercussions**
[end quote]

A lecturer on Ukrainian history said, “Russia alone is a country. Russia with Ukraine is an empire.” He also made the point that each generation creates its own history.

To say that Putin is crazy because he is violating the peace that characterizes the 21st century is invalid. The 21st century will only be peaceful if nations keep the peace. Putin is a standard, garden-variety imperialist who has no intention of keeping the peace. He has hundreds of years of Russian history to pick and choose from. He has chosen Russian imperial history during the reign of Catherine the Great where Ukraine was taken over and called “Little Russia.”

Putin is unlikely to stop trying to assemble his empire because his motivation isn’t financial but egotistical. Russia’s economy is vulnerable, but the rest of the world is also vulnerable to blowback due to the supply chain issues and inflation caused by the sanctions.

I predict that 2022 will be an “interesting” year that will make us nostalgic for the peace of 2021.

If the Fed doesn’t raise interest rates we will see high inflation. If the Fed does raise interest rates we will see a slowing economy at best and likely a recession in late 2022.

Russia will conquer Ukraine. It will be destructive. It will be a bloodbath. That’s totally consistent with the Russian method. Putin will ignore financial hardships on the Russian people. That’s also consistent with the Russian method since time began. Putin will arrest any protesters. Stalin arrested and killed millions. Putin can do the same. (cf. “The Gulag Archipelago,” by Alexandr Solzhenitsyn, a deeply shocking and depressing book.)

NATO had better start seriously reinforcing the Baltic states because those are next on Putin’s empire list.

Wendy

9 Likes

He has hundreds of years of Russian history to pick and choose from.

He could be facing on a “Czar” moment–when he and his family all get executed to end his reign and make permanent changes to Russia.

1 Like

Past Goldman Sachs Chatham House UK Finance minister Jim O’Neill (need that sort of credential to be credible on this subject) has penned a fascinating macro perspective on Ukraine War as showcasing transformation of the primary form of international power struggle from threats of violence to threats of sudden and radical disconnection from world econ via disconection from financial plumbing. Well worth a look.

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2022/mar/01/putin-error…

Putin isn’t such a great strategist after all…freezing the central bank’s foreign exchange reserves…bold move by leading western nations to agree to remove key Russian banks from the Swift plumbing…has essentially eradicated the relevance of Russia’s massive official foreign exchange reserves, and with it, sowed the seeds for big problems for the Russian economy. I had been thinking throughout recent weeks: how can a country that is no longer in the top 10 largest of the world’s economy (barely 2% of global GDP now) have such apparent military importance around the world? After the further collapse of the currency, the ability of Russia to remain anywhere near as important globally is starting to rapidly fade.

Krugman has an excellent subscriber only column out (a friend showed me but so sorry I have no link) pointing out multiple solid socio-economic analyses over the past 150 years showing war as obsolete, but war continues. Putin and others have not yet absorbed the message. Bottom line why is war “obsolete”? Because connection to international trade is so far much more valuable than anything that you can go and conquer. Of course, what we now know from watching the arguments and then failures of warmongering from WWI’s idiot royal descendants of Victoria through to our own century’s Bush/Cheney and Putin is that temporary political demagougery, short term piratical gains, and eternal emotional attractions of war are resistant to reason, and the sort of world community necessary to make and enforce a reasoned case against war has not emerged.

david fb

2 Likes

Another tremendously good source of info this past week has been Michael Kofman of the mostly invisible CNA, earlier named “Center for Naval Analyses”, a federally funded think tank.

Here is a link to a potent twitter thread he authored, with more knowledge and analyses in one place than any of the mass media blather I have seen:

https://twitter.com/KofmanMichael/status/1498381975022940167…

david fb

7 Likes

Here is a link to a potent twitter thread he authored, with more knowledge and analyses in one place than any of the mass media blather I have seen:

https://twitter.com/KofmanMichael/status/1498381975022940167…

david fb

Thanks David, it was really good right up until some white page with a blue dove on it covered the page and asked me to sign up. }};-@

The Coles notes are the Russian military leaders thought they only needed to point their vehicles south and keep going until the Ukrainian troops ran out onto the streets with bottles of wine to welcome their liberators.

No sign of a plan B when that failed miserably other than to load up thousands of tanks, IFVs and trucks and see if their enemy gets it right this time and surrenders on que. Part of their problem is that they are trying to hide their lack of success from the unwashed masses … that rarely works.

Tim

Krugman has an excellent subscriber only column out (a friend showed me but so sorry I have no link) pointing out multiple solid socio-economic analyses over the past 150 years showing war as obsolete, but war continues. Putin and others have not yet absorbed the message. Bottom line why is war “obsolete”? Because connection to international trade is so far much more valuable than anything that you can go and conquer. Of course, what we now know from watching the arguments and then failures of warmongering from WWI’s idiot royal descendants of Victoria through to our own century’s Bush/Cheney and Putin is that temporary political demagougery, short term piratical gains, and eternal emotional attractions of war are resistant to reason, and the sort of world community necessary to make and enforce a reasoned case against war has not emerged.

It was an excellent column. It is primarily based on a book written in 1907 by Norman Angell. I don’t think it is online, but here are a couple excerpts.:

In such a global economy, it’s hard to conquer another country without cutting that country — and yourself — off from the international division of labor, not to mention the international financial system, at great cost. We can see that dynamic happening to Russia as we speak.

(Norman Angell) also emphasized the limits to confiscation in a modern economy: You can’t just seize industrial assets the way preindustrial conquerors could seize land, because arbitrary confiscation destroys the incentives and sense of security an advanced society needs to stay productive. Again, history vindicated his analysis. For a while, Nazi Germany occupied nations with a combined prewar gross domestic product roughly twice its own — but despite ruthless exploitation, the occupied territories seem to have paid for only about 30 percent of the German war effort, in part because many of the economies Germany tried to exploit collapsed under the burden.

9 Likes