Small companies buying cryptocurrencies

https://www.wsj.com/finance/currencies/crypto-treasury-e7ae573c?mod=hp_lead_pos1

The Hottest Business Strategy This Summer Is Buying Crypto

Small companies are raising billions of dollars to buy bitcoin and other, more obscure cryptocurrencies. What could possibly go wrong?

By Gregory Zuckerman and Vicky Ge Huang, The Wall Street Journal, July 25, 2025

It’s the hottest trade of the summer.

Companies are raising tens of billions of dollars, not to invest in their businesses or hire employees, but to purchase bitcoin and more obscure cryptocurrencies…

The companies that are taking the plunge are being transparent about their plans to raise cash and put it all in crypto. They argue that they can do things ​an ETF cannot, such as “stake” tokens, or lock them up for a specified amount of time t​o earn a return. The companies can also borrow money to buy ​additional cryptocurrencies, ​something ETFs​ also can’t do…

Since June 1, 98 companies have announced plans to raise over $43 billion to buy bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, according to Architect Partners, a crypto advisory firm. Nearly $86 billion has been raised for this purpose since the start of the year. That’s more than double the amount of money raised in initial public offerings in the U.S. in 2025, according to Dealogic…

Lately, tiny companies are working with recognized names in finance to raise cash to buy crypto. … [end quote]

OMG!!! This is crazy!!! It’s a pure speculative frenzy that is characteristic of a late-stage bubble.

How many ways is this crazy?

  1. Non-financial companies exist to profit from selling products and services, not by speculation.

  2. How do companies “raise money”? By selling shares in the company or by borrowing. Either way they put their main business at risk. Crypto currencies don’t produce dividends or interest but money that’s borrowed to buy crypto will require interest payments. If (when) the value of the cryptocurrency plunges they could bankrupt or lose control of their company. Especially if they are leveraged (bought with borrowed money).

  3. Why in the world would an investor lend (or buy shares in) a company to buy crypto? If they wanted crypto exposure they could just buy crypto themselves (or an ETF). If they want to invest in the company why would they want to increase their risk by crypto speculation?

  4. Why would a company “work with recognized names in finance to raise cash to buy crypto”? The so-called “recognized financier” will take their own cut, reducing any profit from the crypto.

  5. When a bubble bursts it usually is sudden, sharp and irrevocable. (cf. “Manias, Panics and Crashes.”) A small company with a crypto investment could lose most of it practically overnight.

  6. Small businesses make up 99.9% of all companies in the U.S. A significant portion of these small businesses (over 80%) are nonemployer firms, meaning they have no paid employees other than the owner(s). I can picture an entrepreneur approaching friends or family and asking to borrow money for the business and then investing it in crypto. This is like the 1929 shoeshine boy who gave a stock tip to J.P. Morgan.

  7. According to data from the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA), small businesses (1 to 499 employees) account for approximately 39.0% of the private sector payroll , which translates to about $3.2 trillion annually. This shifts the risk to the Macroeconomic scale. It’s horrifying to think that this speculative behavior could spread to small but significant employers.

There’s always risk when investing.

There’s a big difference between the normal business cycle and a financial crisis. I’m always on the lookout for trends that could trigger a financial crisis which involves spreading and deepening losses.

Crypto speculative losses by employers could cause layoffs of employees that aren’t caused by the business cycle. Like all major layoff cycles this could trigger a recession as the laid-off employees spend less.

What could go wrong? OMG!!!
Wendy

9 Likes

Late stage or early stage? It’s definitely a bubble, but I think it is in the irrational exuberance phase, and we have much further to go. That is just my guess. I am watching daily though because this could get fun.

5 Likes

keep moving, nothing to worry about…

Maybe Trump could borrow this next strategy.

Yeah, utter lunacy. 12345678

3 Likes

Maximizing “JC” wealth. Even better than a public company buying back it’s own stock. As has been discussed here, a number of times, the US tax code incentivizes financial speculation, over productive endeavor. There are probably several things in the BBB, that “management consultants” are leveraging to sell a “plan” to “JCs” to enrich themselves.

Steve

2 Likes

The reason isn’t obvious, but I’ll illustrate why buying shares of a Bitcoin treasury company is so compelling, using the company that started all this as an example, MSTR. MSTR stock is up 3,360% over the last five years, beating every company in the S&P500, including NVDA which is up a paltry 2,462%.

MSTR is ostensibly a software company, but it has no earnings (P/E is infinite). Instead it focuses on buying Bitcoin. Because it has no earnings and no real hope of earnings, all the company’s value is essentially owed to the Bitcoin holdings.

Perplexity tells me that as of today, MSTR owns about 607,770 bitcoins. With Bitcoin trading at ~$118,000 per coin, this is $71.7billion.

MSTR’s market cap is about $115.09 billion.

You can start to see the appeal here. By buying MSTR instead of Bitcoin directly, you almost double you money!

What’s not to like? You put one dollar in and get two dollars out. No wonder nail salons and florists are getting in on this. You no longer need income to grow the company’s value. You just hold Bitcoin and free money comes out.

5 Likes

Someone posted a pic of tulip bulbs recently.

Steve

4 Likes

I’m just a humble accountant and not a fancy Wall Street finance guy, but I think you’ve got this backwards. When you put $115 into MSTR you are getting only $71 of bitcoin. At least from the investor’s point of view.

—Peter

13 Likes

There are people who will make sure to call that a win.

The comment was from the business leader’s point of view.

Step 1: Create a company (or, better yet, steal a viable name)
Step 2: Announce plans to buy BTC
Step 3: Collect investor dollars
Step 4: enjoy a premium market cap to BTC assets at today’s print
Step 5: Pocket the difference between price premium and par value
Step 6: double down on BTC
Step 7: ???
Step 8: Bankruptcy

(keep the fees)

What’s not to like?

7 Likes

Here’s a good one:

Denver Pastor and Wife Face Charges in ‘God-Inspired’ Cryptocurrency Scheme

The pastor, Eligio Regalado, and his wife, Kaitlyn Regalado, spent more than $1 million of investor funds on home renovations, plane tickets and au pair services, prosecutors said.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/27/us/colorado-pastor-crypto-scam.html

Hey, at least somebody got some use out of the money!

5 Likes

Yes, when the Lord tells you to do something, you do it!

Pete

3 Likes

“The Lord delivered all these people to us, offering their money. It would have been against God’s will to not take their money”. Right?

Steve

1 Like

Yep. Let he who is without blockchain throw the first coin.

Pete

9 Likes

Were they planning on sinning?

Were they planning on sinning?

It would be a dead giveaway if they were using the crypto to buy indulgences.

For quite a while, the church sold indulgences for cash, so, if you had the cash, you could carry on any way you wanted, and buy your way out of trouble. If you didn’t have the cash, you would burn. iirc, there was one place you could get an indulgence free: from a monastery at the top of a cliff. There were stairs carved into the face of the cliff. I have forgotten how high that cliff is, but it isn’t trivial. If you climbed up those stone stairs, on your knees, you could get an indulgence for free.

…as I said, my favorite subject in school was history.

Steve

3 Likes

Those companies are only doing what their shareholders want them to do. The shareholders literally hand the company new money (via new shares, via preferred shares, via new debt, etc) and approve of them buying crypto. And so far every time they do it, their market cap rises more than the crypto they’ve purchased. So, let’s say a company called microstrategy sells $1B in new shares, then buys $1B of bitcoin, and then their market cap goes up by $1.5B. Why wouldn’t they do that repeatedly? Especially if they keep selling new, more expensive, shares every time? Or if they borrow at rates lower than the rate the price of bitcoin is growing? Obviously, if bitcoin has a sustained drop, this strategy doesn’t work anymore. But the previous money that has been raised from investors still remains in the company (in the form of crypto) albeit at a lower value.

They’re only doing what their shareholders approve of, and want them to do. Otherwise those shareholders wouldn’t keep providing new money.

1 Like

The road to hell is paved in crypto.

2 Likes

An interesting look at the effects of dollar stablecoins.

“Such dominance of the U.S. dollar would provide the United States with strategic and economic advantages, allowing it to finance its debt more cheaply while exerting global influence,” ECB adviser Jürgen Schaaf said in a post that does not necessarily reflect the ECB’s own views.

“For Europe, this would mean higher financing costs relative to the United States, reduced monetary policy autonomy and geopolitical dependency,” he added.

If dollar-based stablecoins become widely used in the euro area, for payments, savings or settlement, the ECB’s control over monetary conditions could be weakened, Schaaf argued.

DB2

6 Likes

Then again, privately-issued stablecoins come with their own headaches of potential issues spilling over into ‚real‘ markets once they have grown big enough.

On a related turf, the ECB seems to be ahead on its digital currency, something I understand the Fed has now been explicitly banned from doing.

4 Likes