SNOW Q1 Results

So the slowdown is not as big as it would seem at first glance - it’s seasonal, and the RPO dynamics were well explained. Still, both qoq percentages were down a little vs the same Q of last year. But then again that’s to be expected as the company scales.

So probably a red herring, yes.

WSM

Interesting observations regarding growth comparison. I saw 110% Y/Y growth for revenue and 206% RPO growth and I did not register a slowdown…

One observation. In comparing actuals with 4Q guidance ( assuming I have the right nos.) they beat their revenue estimate by 8.35% and their Y/Y growth estimate by 17% (110% vs 88-92% guided) I am guessing they will continue to beat by similar percentages going forward.

Also they are projecting that 54% of current RPO will be recognized as income this year. That is about 75% of FY projected revenue . Add to this Slootman’s remarks on the ramp up time for new million dollar accounts (and other accounts) and the number of existing accounts nearing this figure it wouldn’t surprise me if the beat gets a bit larger.

we shall see.

cheers

draj

8 Likes

And for all the people worried about Snowflake’s results, they are now up $3.30 when I just looked, bearing out my impression that there was nothing really wrong, while for comparison, Okta is down $26.00 because something really does seem to be wrong.

Saul

29 Likes

“Cash on hand: $5.1bn”

Snowflake has not $5.1bn cash on hand.

According to the press statement they reported:

Cash $644 mio
Short term investments $3,285 mio

The operative cash flow was positive, but FCF was still negative according to cash flow statement (different to their No-GAAP FCF).

According to Cash Flow statement cash decreased $174 mio during the last quarter from $835 mio to $660 mio.

Should we expect a capital raise?

Indeed, okta cfo quit just one qty on the job, that is really wrong.

Cash & Equivalents + “Quasi cash” is $5.1b:

Cash & Equivalents $645m
Short-term investments $3,286m
Long-term investments $1,178m
TOTAL $5,109m

So, for all intents and purposes, they do have $5.1b of a war chest for running the business and growing via acquisitions.

6 Likes

My take always from the Conference Call that I don’t believe have been raised here yet are:

104 customers with trailing 12-month product revenue greater than $1 million, +35%QoQ
What was more telling to me was that…
25% of customers with >$1million annual revenue are Fortune 500 companies. That means 75% are smaller.
Does this mean G2000 companies are all going to grow their TTM spend greater than $1million? It means that some have. I believe that in order to keep up with those that have others must.

Snowflakes largest vertical is Streaming media and Digital Advertising.
I liked Pinterest for the flood of ad spend I’m expecting the second half of this year. What percent of ad spend paid to Pinterest is going to Snowflake?

When asked about Snowflake achieving Fed Ramp High this year and if Snowflake Security is that good. The answer was yes. Is that Hubris? I’m asking.

Regarding digital transformation and the benefits of the Snowflake Archecture for storage: Last quarter Snowflake said time to migration onto their platform was six months. This Conference Call their now saying 9 months. This is putting their current revenue growth figures as a longer lagging indicator.

Deloitte assisted the digital transformation onto the Snowflake Platform of zero companies a year ago. Deloitte brought Snowflake $100million in revenue over the course of this last year for this reason.

But Snowflake doesn’t improve their margins by charging for storage. So improved compression technology isn’t going hurt here. They increase their margins by the usage of compute. Durable ongoing usage is increased by the number of edges utilized. Snowflake announced that Edges increasing 33% QoQ. This means that each company has developed , on average, 33% greater integration into the Snowflake ecosystem. The insights each company gains are dependent on the other companies within the Snowflake ecosystem. Not only does this increase the stickiness of the platform but greater integration increases usage by way of improving insights. Last quarter Slootman announced an Innovation transformation taking place on Snowflake. I believe he was referring to the improvement in the level of insights attainable with the increase in the number of these edges and thus the growing integration of greater numbers of Enterprises into the Snowflake platform.

I sold 20% prior to earnings to add to Zoom info. I’m thinking that may have been short sighted?

Still Long 11% SNOW

Best,

Jason

4 Likes

104 customers with trailing 12-month product revenue greater than $1 million, +35%QoQ
What was more telling to me was that…
25% of customers with >$1million annual revenue are Fortune 500 companies. That means 75% are smaller.
Does this mean G2000 companies are all going to grow their TTM spend greater than $1million? It means that some have. I believe that in order to keep up with those that have others must.

Will O

What caught my attention was two points. The first was the acceleration in the rate of addition of
customers with TTM of $1M

It was +35% in Q1, and +18% in Q4 . There were 65 such customers in the prior quarter so the increase in Q3 must have been just above 9% Q/Q . 12 months earlier they had “only” 31 such clients.

The second point was Slootman’s comment that there were a number of small companies whose spend was approaching $1 M. So c acceleration may continue in this fashion.

I also noted his comments on the future potential inherent in the addition of “edges”. Edges are contacts with data stored by other Snowflake customers. The more “edges” a company has the greater the opportunities for expansion in usage involving other outside but relevant data sets. IMHO this offers enormous growth possibility. I also like the emphasis on storage compression offering more data available at speed with no additional cost…

“One question during the Q&A was “why was Snowflake so successful”…The answer was that Snowflake was using a “completely new approach” to the core architecture for data storage,retrieval and usage.As a consequence SNOW workloads run “orders of magnitude” faster than any legacy system and therefore users are getting data back in” “hours and minutes” instead of days or longer. It boggles the mind.

All this notwithstanding SNOW is working to get responses to database queries back to the user in real time. Imagine that. That will be an even more powerful usage driver in the future.

All in all , to my simple way of looking at things SNOW is likely to beat its growth projection this year and probably for a bit longer. Perhaps they will even justify current EV/S of 69 (more or less) Time will tell.

cheers

draj

3 Likes

Already so much great discussion here of Snowflake’s quarter - was really debating if I should post this here. Can also read it here on my new blog: https://exponentialdave.com/2021/05/30/hypergrowth-continues…

Years ago, I used to wish that Amazon would spin off AWS, or Microsoft would spin off Azure, allowing me to invest in their cloud services without also having to invest in all the other low margin things Microsoft and Amazon do. But last year, something better came along. That something is Snowflake, a leader and pioneer of the “data cloud”. Snowflake hit a big milestone in this quarter of processing more than 1 billion queries in a single day!

I’m going to oversimplify Snowflake’s business for non-technical people into three major areas: storage of data, compute (ability to do stuff to/with the data), and data sharing. Data sharing is capable both within an organization and between different organizations.

We have very little to complain about in Snowflake’s recently posted quarter as Snowflake grew product revenues 110% year over year to $214 million. Margins jumped to 72%, up from 66% in the comparable quarter last year. Management indicated in the long term, this number could trend upward into the mid 70’s. The net revenue retention rate was 168%, meaning that, if a customer spent $100 last year on the Snowflake platform, this year they are spending $168.

Additionally, the company now has 117% more million dollar customers than the comparable quarter last year, clocking in at 104. And there are many companies on the cusp of the $1mm dollar mark who could very well join the cohort in coming quarters. Net new customer adds (of any dollar amount) was 393 in Q1. These customers only accounted for 1% of revenues, which is a reminder that Snowflake’s time to fully ramp on to the platform is many months long (roughly 6-9 months). Of these customer wins, several were very notable, including Datadog and Walgreens Boots Alliance.

The company’s balance sheet is healthy, with approximately $5.1 billion in cash, cash equivalents and short-term and long-term investments.

A key part in the Snowflake investment thesis is not just its ability to store and process data, but also to make data sharing easier than ever before. The company outlined that “At the end of the quarter, 15% of our rapidly expanding customer base had data edges (data networking relationships) in place with external Snowflake accounts compared to 10% a year ago. And the number of edges in this period grew 33% quarter-on-quarter.” The more edges get made and used, the more useful (and sticky) Snowflake’s platform becomes. The ease and sheer amount of data sharing further enables the value of the data to grow exponentially.

Regarding guidance, the company is guiding revenues between $235 million and $240 million, representing year-over-year growth between 88% and 92%. This equates to 12% sequential growth from Q1 2021 to Q2 2021, which is exactly the same sequential growth they guided for Q1 2021, only to come in 8 percent higher at 20%. I am no fortune teller, but I think it’s very realistic to expect the same thing to happen again. So even though they are forecasting 92% high end growth, it will probably be more like 105% YoY growth on $260mm of revenue.

Part of Snowflake’s business comes from storing data, and the company implemented a compression algorithm that’s so good, it’s going to reduce the company’s revenues by roughly $13 million over the course of fiscal 2022. This might sound like a bad thing to investors, but there is much more money to be made from Snowflake’s compute business. Making storage cheaper will ultimately drive more money into Snowflake’s compute business in the long run. Snowflake indicated they update their compression algorithms roughly every two years, so we can expect this to be something Snowflake does more than once.

An interesting question that came up on the call from an analyst was what advantages does Snowflake have over the hyperscalers (Amazon, Microsoft, Google) that have their own cloud based data warehouse? CEO Frank Slootman’s answer was, to put it simply, better architecture. Snowflake was not architected to straddle the on premise and public cloud environments – it was only made for the public cloud.

Another key aspect driving customers towards Snowflake is governance, a combination of compliance and cybersecurity requirements. Snowflake highlighted its acquisition of a company called CryptoNumerics and its ability to anonymize personal information. This is hyper critical for sharing data and ensuring that personal information is dealt with properly and safely.

No quarter, not even Snowflake’s, is ever perfect. If we temporarily forget about all the new million dollar customers this quarter and turn our attention to net customer adds or fortune 500 customer adds, these numbers came in at a lower rate than previous quarters from a sequential (QoQ) perspective. But company leadership was quick to assert that there will be lumpiness and seasonality in tracking this statistic. Sales reps are much more likely to close new customers, especially big ones such as those in the fortune 500, towards the end of the year, not in Q1.

Another weak point was sequential growth in Remaining Performance Obligation, which clocked in at 7.4%. This appears to be due to seasonality. Last time QoQ (quarter over quarter) growth was about this slow was in the corresponding quarter in 2020.

In summary, Snowflake posted a business as usual quarter. For a company like Snowflake, business as usual is terrific. Based on current guidance and company fundamentals, I am very bullish on Snowflake and will continue to hold for the long term.

88 Likes

I enjoyed your post and agree, EP!
Something to consider…
https://seekingalpha.com/article/4432000-palantir-stock-vs-s…
Best Always!
paul

1 Like

Thank you ExponentialDave for your great post on Snowflake!

I’ve encountered an interesting personal experience with Snowflake which I believe might be of interest to the members of this board [https://jmarquesdatabeyond.medium.com/what-makes-snowflake-s…

"My Personal Experience with Snowflake

Since I first used Snowflake back in 2016, I have been an enthusiastic advocate for its qualities.

Back then, I was implementing a greenfield data platform for a travel company, and when asked to try this new database we hadn’t heard of before, we were highly suspicious of it. It was a time when NoSQL databases were promising an easy world for everyone, and here it was, yet another “tool” claiming to take all the hassle away, no tuning needed, linear scaling…. too good to be true, but still we decided to give it a chance and do a side by side comparison with our preferred tool, AWS Redshift.

For the test, we used the hardest job we had: “shredding” hundreds of millions of click-stream data XML… after a lot of testing, we found that for the same price point, Snowflake won by a nice margin. After some more tests with typical query patterns, we saw that Snowflake was just a better tool for the job, and we went with it.

After little more than one year into the project, I was absolutely sold… let me share an anecdotal story:

I had just found a bug in the shredding process that deemed all our shredded data incomplete. Here I was, 11am on a Friday and my last day before a two week break, how lucky of me… Shredding hundreds of millions of these chunky (some of them 1MB+) XMLs would take forever! Unless…

I call the Client and explain the situation: I needed to start a very big cluster to get this over the finish line in time… And so I did, and the whole thing was done in less than a hour. I went on holidays at 6PM that day, with the work done and worry-free.

The best part? Because it scales linearly, waiting hours for it to run on a small cluster would have cost the same as doing it quickly in a large cluster. This was probably the big turning point for me: I now loved Snowflake.

Conclusions

Snowflake is just a great productivity enabler. It transforms all the expensive waiting around into productive work time: Data Engineers and Analysts are much more expensive than licensing, and this is before we even consider time-to-market. Cherry on top, no more “database administrators” needed, there is really nothing for them here…
I have worked with more than one client handling multi-billion records a day, and I know it can be done with other technologies. But this is the only technology that makes me breathe a sight of relief…"

Lemat

43 Likes