SNOW Q1 Results

Link to full press release: https://investors.snowflake.com/news/news-details/2021/Snowf…

Snowflake Reports Financial Results for the First Quarter of Fiscal 2022
05/26/2021
Product revenue of $213.8 million, representing 110% year-over-year growth
Remaining performance obligations of $1.4 billion, representing 206% year-over-year growth
4,532 total customers
Net revenue retention rate of 168%
104 customers with trailing 12-month product revenue greater than $1 million
No-Headquarters/BOZEMAN, Mont.–(BUSINESS WIRE)-- Snowflake (NYSE: SNOW), the Data Cloud company, today announced financial results for its first quarter of fiscal 2022, ended April 30, 2021.

Revenue for the quarter was $228.9 million, representing 110% year-over-year growth. Product revenue for the quarter was $213.8 million, representing 110% year-over-year growth. Remaining performance obligations were $1.4 billion, representing 206% year-over-year growth. Net revenue retention rate was 168% as of April 30, 2021. The company now has 4,532 total customers and 104 customers with trailing 12-month product revenue greater than $1 million. See the section titled “Key Business Metrics” for definitions of product revenue, remaining performance obligations, net revenue retention rate, total customers, and customers with trailing 12-month product revenue greater than $1 million.

“Snowflake reported strong Q1 results with triple-digit growth in product revenue, reflecting strength in customer consumption,” said Snowflake CEO Frank Slootman. “Remaining performance obligations showed a robust increase year-on-year, indicating strength in sales across the board.”

Lee

8 Likes

I’m having a really hard time understanding what’s so wrong with those numbers that it’s down almost 8% after-hours…

The market makes NO SENSE sometimes…


Paul - Long SNOW.

3 Likes

I think a lot of people who aren’t used to hyper growth investing and looking at the EPS miss. Honestly, that metric doesn’t matter for SNOW at this point. However, remember that a lot of traditionally Buffet investors are in SNOW. They live & die on EPS.

I think its an excellent report; great growth numbers now and in the future. Continuing with triple digit growth. I know its not truly SaaS but their QoQ accelerated.

8 Likes

There was a noticeable decline in customer growth this quarter. The slowest to date.

The number of customers grew by 66% year-on-year. And by 9.5% compared to the previous quarter.

And they only added one new Fortune 500 customer this quarter.

Encouragingly, cash flow from operations, positive for the first time at $21.8

3 Likes

@FixFool: I think the market is reacting to the outlook and guidance provided. Based on the new guidance ($235-240MM Q2 product revenue / $1020-1035MM F22 product revenue), revenue will increase sequentially at ~12% quarterly for the rest of the year. This is a pretty big slowdown for a company that has had 20%+ sequential gains for the past many quarters. Of course we know the game is to set the guidance low so they can beat and raise guidance with every quarterly report for the rest of the year, so who knows where they will really end up. Safe to say that this is likely a low bar for them to meet given the game.

Daws (long SNOW)

3 Likes

The significant increase in the number of employees should be emphasized. 436 new employees. The average number of new employees in the last quarters was around 230.

Many new people in sales.

2 Likes

At first glance it looks like the revenue beat is all good, but this is due to sales success of the past as customers take a long time to ramp up and NRR is astronomical.

And that’s also the crux of the two things that are not that great (vs the expectations of greatness that is priced in):

  1. Customer growth slowed a lot. QoQ growth was 9% vs 14%, 15%, 14%, 16% for Q1 to Q4 of last year. They added 393 customers vs 328, 397, 437, 585 for Q1 to Q4 of last year. So going from 585 customers added last Q to 393 this Q is a bit of a surprise to me.

  2. RPO growth slowed. It was $1.3bn last Q vs $1.4bn now, so an increase of $100m vs $372m last Q. Or 8% QoQ vs 10%, 47%, 35%, 40% for Q1-Q4 of last year. Again - going from 40% QoQ last Q to 8% this Q is a bit disappointing.

So more sales people & costs, but apparently slowing sales momentum. Will need to dig deeper and understand this aspect a bit more, but SNOW is priced for perfection, so I understand the after-market sell-off to some extent. Would like to hear what others think.

-WSM

25 Likes

I think the market is reacting to the outlook and guidance provided. Based on the new guidance ($235-240MM Q2 product revenue / $1020-1035MM F22 product revenue), revenue will increase sequentially at ~12% quarterly for the rest of the year. This is a pretty big slowdown for a company that has had 20%+ sequential gains for the past many quarters.

If they have a similar beat in Q2 as they just reported today then the sequential increase will be ~20%. What slowdown?

Bnh

4 Likes

the customer count in Q1 is 393 vs 685 in Q4 21. No wonder why they recruit more salespersons.

At first glance it looks like the revenue beat is all good, but this is due to sales success of the past as customers take a long time to ramp up and NRR is astronomical.

And that’s also the crux of the two things that are not that great (vs the expectations of greatness that is priced in):

1. Customer growth slowed a lot. QoQ growth was 9% vs 14%, 15%, 14%, 16% for Q1 to Q4 of last year. They added 393 customers vs 328, 397, 437, 585 for Q1 to Q4 of last year. So going from 585 customers added last Q to 393 this Q is a bit of a surprise to me.

2. RPO growth slowed. It was $1.3bn last Q vs $1.4bn now, so an increase of $100m vs $372m last Q. Or 8% QoQ vs 10%, 47%, 35%, 40% for Q1-Q4 of last year. Again - going from 40% QoQ last Q to 8% this Q is a bit disappointing.

So more sales people & costs, but apparently slowing sales momentum. Will need to dig deeper and understand this aspect a bit more, but SNOW is priced for perfection, so I understand the after-market sell-off to some extent. Would like to hear what others think.


About point 2: RPO growth was 10% QoQ which is both faster than in Q1 last year (9%) and Q2 of two years ago (approx. 8%). Your comparison doesn’t make sense as it’s seasonal.

6 Likes

I meant Q1 of two years ago, my apologies.

To add to my comment, RPO was rounded to 1.4 billion but it actually is 1.43 billion, as they state 206% growth compared to Q1 of last year (468 million)

Guidance is weaker then expected:

GUIDANCE:
Q2 2022 revenue $235-240mn vs est. $251mn
FY 2022 revenue $1.02-1.035B vs est. $1.09B

https://twitter.com/skaushi/status/1397646309822111744

Yes the slowdown in topline growth is concerning.

1 Like

Zerohedge,

You are comparing total revenue est to Product revenue guidance. They’re not the same thing

Bnh

6 Likes

RPO growth slowed. It was $1.3bn last Q vs $1.4bn now, so an increase of $100m vs $372m last Q. Or 8% QoQ vs 10%, 47%, 35%, 40% for Q1-Q4 of last year. Again - going from 40% QoQ last Q to 8% this Q is a bit disappointing.

I am listening to the call where they stated last year was the first year they incentivized sales reps to sign multi-year contracts instead of 1 yr contracts. That made the outstanding growth in RPO last year look higher than it actually was. So yes RPO will look like it is slowing but it should normalize this year.

Bnh

8 Likes

RPO growth slowed. It was $1.3bn last Q vs $1.4bn now, so an increase of $100m vs $372m last Q. Or 8% QoQ vs 10%, 47%, 35%, 40% for Q1-Q4 of last year.

You are looking at something seasonal.

The year before last, RPO grew 8% this quarter and then 60% the next.
Last year (as you yourself pointed out), RPO grew by 10% this quarter and by 47% the next.

And it was up 206% this quarter yoy. How can you complain about that?

I suspect that for all of these issues that you point out, customer companies like to sign up starting at the end of the calendar year or fiscal year, so they sign up during SNOW’s 4th quarter. I suspect that the RPO and number of customer sign-ups will turn out to be false issues (red herrings). Sorry.

Best,

Saul

62 Likes

I am working for a top financial company and we have a lot of databases in our production.

What Saul said is true:
We signed up Snowflake in 2020Q4 due to annual budget cycle, and deployed Snowflake and migrated our legacy database(s) into Snowflake in 2021Q1.

(1) Snowflake is very easy to use
We have a lot of training sessions for Snowflake which I never go through. But after we deployed it into production, I just open it and start to use it, based on their very user friendly interfaces. We have hadoop, Oracle, Sybase, DB2, Vertica etc… I did not hear too much complains from dev team migrating our legacy DBs into Snowflakes. And it is very faster than our legacy DBs.

(2) Usage will be lagged
We finished deployment and migration in February, and still running our data both on Snowflake and legacy DBs parallelly. So Q2 billing will be low and it will take sometimes, like 2-3 quarters for billing to start going up. Because we have to get ourselves familiar with Snowflake and start to run our R&D jobs on it, and then start to migrate our jobs on Snowflake. Data migration and running jobs are different. For example, data migration will be charged by storage but the real money will be made by charging our daily routine job execution on huge Big Data volume. As the board pointed out: enterprise customers growth is a leading indicator, and the revenue growth will follow.

(3) Very smart fee charging structure
We can config our usage, speed, etc by different cost layer. Now we started with on lower end, and I am pretty sure the bills will go up significantly in 3-4 quarters.

Best

– Waver
Long SNOW

105 Likes

Just a couple of Q&A responses that address these 2 points of potential concern from WSM that are additional to all points raised in this thread

  1. Slowing Customer Growth…
    Well, these large accounts are very, very long sales cycles, and you are going to see lumpiness in the additions. Obviously, Q4 was a strong quarter. And as one would expect, that’s just landing a customer. That doesn’t mean it contributed to revenue. As I said, most of those Fortune 500, we landed in Q4. We’ve seen virtually no revenue from them yet today. I can’t stress that enough. And given Q4 is the end of a commission year for people and accelerators, reps do everything natural to close everything in the end of that commission year. So I fully expect we’ll continue to close Fortune 500 the balance of the year. And it’s all based upon when the customer is ready to begin that journey.

  2. Slowing RPO growth/Revenue Guidance…
    On your question, Kash, on the beat, we did flow the beat through to the full year guidance, plus about $1 million more, but we also had the headwind going to the full year. As I mentioned, we introduced new storage compression technology that we literally just rolled out. And based upon the early feedback of that, it’s going to take about $13 million of our revenue away from the company because the economics of our storage is so much better for our customer, with that compression being much higher than we were expecting it to be. Switch is a good thing for our customers. And longer term, it’s going to drive more – it’s going to cause customers to put more data in Snowflake, which will ultimately drive more consumption.

Ant

43 Likes

Thanks for the thoughts above Saul, Ant, Waver and bnh.

Points well made on seasonality. I’ve now had time to review the results in more detail and came away very impressed. Before highlighting what stood out to me, just quickly on those two point above, looking at the qoq change vs the same Q last year:

Net new sales: I calculated the average number of new customers landed per S&M customer, and this is down slightly (but not materially) vs Q1 2021, from 0.30 to 0.27. So they did land slightly less customers per S&M employee - slightly lower productivity. They also did have a slightly slower qoq customer growth this Q of 9% vs 14% in Q1 2021.

RPO: This went from $1,333m to $1,432m - so up 7% qoq vs 10% in Q1 of last year so again a small slowdown. The CFO explained RPO dynamics as follows in the Q&A:

”Well, last year was the first year we really incentivized our sales force to sell multiyear contracts. And what I would say is now it’s getting more into the normal sales motion of our salespeople. It’s more natural for them to be going in and asking customers to sign a 3-year contract. Historically, we used to sell 1-year contracts only. “

So the slowdown is not as big as it would seem at first glance - it’s seasonal, and the RPO dynamics were well explained. Still, both qoq percentages were down a little vs the same Q of last year. But then again that’s to be expected as the company scales.

So probably a red herring, yes.

Here are some things that stood out for me from the results:

NRR: 168%

And >160 expected for the remainder of the year; same as guide last Q. This is of course fantastic; it’s also great that the guide is still for >160%.

Cash on hand: $5.1bn

And FCF positive at $23.4m and guiding for no cash burn in the rest of the year. So they have $5bn to spend and don’t need any of it to build the current business, so it will all be for M&A which hopefully will further accelerate growth in future.

Product GM% trending up:

This came in at 72%, the highest ever, from 66% a year ago Q1. And in the Q&A they re-iterated the guide to mid-70’s.

CFO: “I don’t see a dip happening in our product gross margins at all, but there is a limit to where you can get to. And when we’re going through our IPO, people were asking questions. I did say I don’t see us getting into the 80s. I can see a path to the mid-70s. We may, one day, be able to get into the high 70s.”

Operating margin improvement:

Starting in Q3 2020 to now: -93%, -73%, -66%, -44%, -30%, -24%, -16%.
So in a year they went from -66% to -16% - 50%pts improvement in a year.

Sales force verticalisation:

Sales org has been focused on 6 verticals, and is starting to bear fruit, but will really start to show results in the Q’s ahead, I think.

Data sharing opportunity:

“catching on like wildfire” - Analyst’s words: edges going from 10% to 15% and the number of edges up 33% quarter-on-quarter.

$1m+ customer adoption:

27 customers getting to $1 million-plus level this quarter - more than the total added first three quarters all of last year.

CFO: "As I said, most of those Fortune 500, we landed in Q4. We’ve seen virtually no revenue from them yet today.

International growth:

Both EMEA and APAC exceeded their plan; EMEA bookings grew over 200%, Asia Pac over 300%.
Growth in Europe now contributes 13% of revenue vs 10% a year ago, so growth is extremely high.

CEO: “So I’m personally going to invest a bunch of time in Europe, given my own background, because I think the opportunity is tremendous. So we’re excited that we actually see these regions coming online and contributing and we expect that to continue.”

So they are stepping on the gas for Europe specifically which bodes very well.

Partner acceleration:

CFO: “Our relationship with Deloitte, who is our lead partner, they went from a standing start a little bit over a year ago to $100 million of business, which is an absolutely ripping trajectory that they’re on. It just shows here that demand for these migrations is enormous.”

So all in all a great set of results. I’m keeping my position as is.

-WSM
(Long SNOW 14%)

67 Likes

Snowflake user here – I’d like to highlight a couple of things noted by either other users of snowflake, or in the earnings q&a.

Snowflake charges on use, not on storage (or at least the primary part of their revenue is use). It will take time for new and large customers to figure out just how easy it is to use snowflake. Once these large users catch on, snowflake revenues will REALLY ramp up.

Second, the new compression technology that snow rolled out will make it cheaper for them to hold data, and easier for users to use it (again, snowflake revenues ramp up).

Long snow

26 Likes