Take a robot to dinner?

Robots run out of energy long before they run out of work to do − feeding them could change that

by James Pikul , The Conversation, June 2, 2025

→ big snip <—
…Though most robotics research into the energy problem has focused on better batteries, there is another possibility: Build robots that eat.

Robots move well but run out of steam

Modern robots are remarkably good at moving. Thanks to decades of research in biomechanics, motor control and actuation, machines such as Boston Dynamics’ Spot and Atlas can walk, run and climb with an agility that once seemed out of reach. In some cases, their motors are even more efficient than animal muscles.

But endurance is another matter. …

The issue isn’t how robots move – it’s how they store energy. Most mobile robots today use lithium-ion batteries, the same type found in smartphones and electric cars. These batteries are reliable and widely available, but their performance improves at a slow pace: Each year new lithium-ion batteries are about 7% better than the previous generation. At that rate, it would take a full decade to merely double a robot’s runtime.

Animals store energy in fat, which is extraordinarily energy dense: nearly 9 kilowatt-hours per kilogram. That’s about 68 kWh total in a sled dog, similar to the energy in a fully charged Tesla Model 3. Lithium-ion batteries, by contrast, store just a fraction of that, about 0.25 kilowatt-hours per kilogram. Even with highly efficient motors, a robot like Spot would need a battery dozens of times more powerful than today’s to match the endurance of a sled dog.

And recharging isn’t always an option. In disaster zones, remote fields or on long-duration missions, a wall outlet or a spare battery might be nowhere in sight…

If robots are to play meaningful roles in society assisting the elderly, exploring hazardous environments and working alongside humans, they need the endurance to stay active for hours, not minutes…

Some researchers are building systems that let robots “digest” metal or chemical fuels and breathe oxygen. For example, synthetic, stomachlike chemical reactors could convert high-energy materials such as aluminum into electricity…

Other researchers are developing fluid-based energy systems that circulate like blood. One early example, a robotic fish, tripled its energy density by using a multifunctional fluid instead of a standard lithium-ion battery… [end quote]

I didn’t realize what a limitation battery power is for robots. Real-world applications from household robots to drones to swarms of tiny insect-like robots would be vastly expanded if the robot could quickly refuel.
Wendy

7 Likes

There’s always gasoline, which Google tells me has an energy density of about 13 kWh per kilogram. Or even coal, at 6.7 kWh per kilogram.

Would be a weird thing to live in a world with wood-fired robots walking around, but somewhere there’s a bunch of steampunk enthusiasts would would just explode with joy if that were to happen…

6 Likes

This is a big argument against bipedal robots. Legs require stabilization which makes them power hungry. Put them on wheels and the power requirements go down, along with the complexity.

1 Like

Heh heh … this would also require some sort of device to extract that energy from those fuels and convert it into a form of energy that the robot can use to “think” and to move itself. And that device has mass and weight of its own.

A small Briggs and Stratton lawn mower engine weighs about 31 pounds.

lots of gas leaf blowers and string trimmers are under 10 lbs.
But who wants a gas engine running at Grandma’s house that is watching her and helping her? Just put a couple of wireless chargers around the place and the robot can step on one or put a hand on one every so often

Mike

1 Like

That sounds like pretty fast charging.

DB2

I decided to look for the edge case that would validate the article. Found it, “recharging isn’t always an option.”

And found the hare-brained solution! Has he/she/it never heard of over the air recharging?

The Captain

The application determines whether wheels are feasible. On a smooth, uniform floor or ground, yes. On a ground which is uneven or with steps, robots with legs (not necessarily two legs) will be able to move while wheels will not.

Wendy

1 Like

Exactly. The humanoid robots are not the ultimate be all, end all of solving all problems. The valid question is, is it cost effective for the specific application?

The Captain

1 Like

Simple robots with wheels can’t climb stairs…but some can.

Mike

3 Likes