Tesla FSD NOT Ready for Prime Time?

This “expert” says so.

The Associated Press reported on August 28, 2024 that William Stein, a technology analyst at Truist Securities, has taken Elon Musk up on his invitation to try the latest versions of Tesla’s Full Self Driving system three times in the past four months.

During his ride, Stein said, the Tesla felt smooth and more human-like than with past FSD versions. But in a trip of less than 10 miles, he said the car made a left turn from a through lane while running a red light. “That was stunning,” Stein said.

He said he did not take control of the car because there was little traffic in the area, which made the maneuver seem less dangerous. Later the car drove down the middle of a parkway, straddling two lanes that carry traffic in the same direction. This time, Stein said, he intervened.

During two earlier test drives he took, in April and July, Stein said Tesla vehicles also surprised him with unsafe moves.

1 Like

How many red lights has FSD run?

The Captain

Was it in a red light district…???

3 Likes

From that report once in three outings. Plus other crazy stuff.

I had no clue it was that bad. I knew it was not going to be ready.

Elon Musk is a dreamer. He will need quantum computing to get this done…10 years from now…if ever.

I have zero faith it happens till computers have sentient life over 100 years from now.

Computers do not learn.

I use FSD daily (Boston). I am on v12.3. It is very good. My office commute is about 1 hour. I have 1 or 2 interventions every day.
This is down from 7-10 interventions from 2 months ago. I am waiting for 12.5x.

I have taken Waymo rides in SF. Waymo is also very good but does not go on highways and stays below a speed limit.

1 Like

It reminds of “look mom no hands”! “Look mom no teeth”.

It would be safer (and less exhausting) for me to drive manually than to sit and wait for the 1 or 2 interventions in an hour long drive.

You really need to get this down to something like one non-lethal intervention per month before anyone is buying it.

I’ve always thought the geofenced interstate highway system would be the first application since it’s limited access and there’s less chance someone is going to roll a baby carriage in front of your vehicle. But I guess the risk analysts are afraid of hitting something at highway speeds.

intercst

5 Likes

A three way thread, Believers, Deniers, & SoWhats.

Of the three, who would thrive at Tesla?

Tesla Will DOMINATE, GM will Fail (I THOUGHT I knew everything about Tesla, but boy was I WRONG!)

The Captain

1 Like

The funny thing as we drive all we do manually is interventions. We steer this way and that to avoid people in parkinglots, people walking we see at the last minute, and anything else that we can kill or dent our car body with.

All of it is interventions.

Sentient life would be trust worthy.

Machines do not learn.

One billion miles later and the car is in the middle of two highway lanes. Not a care in the world because machines do not care.

3 Likes

I don’t think so. While all my car has is “lane follow” and “smart cruise”, I find that it takes away 90% of the aggravation of driving, at least on limited access roads. It’s easy to go for hours and hours and let the car do most of the work.

It’s just OK on more congested, less predictable streets, but even then it’s helpful, if not perfect. It, as the saying goes, takes a load off.

3 Likes

I find FSD is much safer and will not drive without it anymore.
The progress in last 7 years has been amazing. The pace is getting better and better. The progress in last few months has been incredible with v12.3 as game changer. It is magical. It maneuvers around construction zones, recognizes Police hand gestures, allows for dynamic route changes. I always thought it would be until 2030 that we will get true FSD. I am now highly confident that we will get it by 2026. I am looking forward to the v12.5x.

3 Likes

Elon Musk promising Robotaxi “next year” for almost a decade now.

https://www.reddit.com/r/interestingasfuck/comments/1f7giyx/elon_musk_promising_tesla_robotaxis_for_next_year/

3 Likes

Shareholders understand this and see the progress.

There are about 50 self driving startups in last 10 years with a $1B valuation that have folded in the last decade.

2 Likes

It’s not true. You have to trust me on that, at least until you try Tesla FSD for a while. It has become far more relaxing, AND the car is mostly a better driver for normal circumstances, it sees better than I do, it stabilizes in the lane better, and it is almost always predictable. About the only time I have to really be on alert is for “big” changes, like an exit from the highway where there are 4 lanes, some left, some right, and some straight (to a service road for example). I’ve had the car drive my wife and me to a local movie theater many times, that ride includes roads from 25 mi/hr to 55 mi/hr, it has right turns and left turns, some with arrows some without, it has 2 traffic circles, it has 4 “complex” intersections (2 left turn lanes, 2-3 straight lanes, 1 right turn lane, etc). And it succeeds every time with recent versions (last year or so). Once reaching the theater, I take over to park, but sometimes it can park on its own (shocked the he11 out of me the first time it did that!), but it doing the parking is too slow for me, and it doesn’t choose the parking spots that I prefer. It does not pull into my driveway by itself yet.

Also, you have to understand what “intervention” means in most cases. The VAST majority of the time it does NOT mean “I took over because it would have crashed” or “I took over because it was about to go through a red light”. Instead it means “I took over because the next lane over was moving much faster” or “I took over because I see it would be better to get into the turning lane early” or “I want to get around this darned truck quickly” or “I don’t like the parking spot it chooses and want to pick my own”, etc.

4 Likes