What a difference a 100 days makes

LOL I have asked you where you got that 2% number before and you showed me a study about people that were invested in mutual funds. Clearly you are an intelligent person but to keep wagging that number around is just BS. The vast majority of people are like you. Not really interested in investing so they put their money into index and mutual funds. Nothing wrong with that if that is what you want to do but for the people who really put the effort into investing and read and learn it really isn’t that hard to figure it out. But I have to laugh when I see people like you putting so much effort into trying to scare people like me.

I guess I have a different outlook on life. I always tell everyone if they put in the effort and study you really can do anything. But then I have never limited myself by thinking there isn’t anything I can’t do.

1 Like

Worked for me. When I got started I was going to be a stock picker. Figured out quick that low cost index funds were a better way to go for me. Still have the stocks, 6% of my portfolio. Selling them would be expensive in capital gains, but I do it slowly. Also a multi $M. Started out with pretty much nuthin’ but an engineering degree and no debt.

6 Likes

Sure I know guys that did it all with dividend paying stocks. They live off their dividends. I know people that did it with index funds, they got there eventually. I know people that did it with real estate, have more money than most people on this board. I did it with growth stocks. I can guarantee that the people investing in index funds never had a year where they were up over 100 percent.

3 Likes

Oh, you are going me make me be pedantic!

QLD - 2X NASDAQ INDEX: 2023 return: 117.13%
https://www.morningstar.com/etfs/arcx/qld/quote

UPRO - 3X S&P 500 INDEX: 2019 return: 102.31%
https://www.morningstar.com/etfs/arcx/upro/quote

And, I don’t personal own this one because it exceeds my risk tolerance but:

TQQQ - 3X NASDAQ INDEX: 2023 return: 198.26%
https://www.morningstar.com/etfs/xnas/tqqq/quote
Four of the last 10 years had 100+ returns.

Still all index funds. :wink:

Hawkwin
Owns UPRO and QLD

2 Likes

LOL now tell Intercst that he should hold them. I think most people that hold index funds would never touch them. You have to have a little more fortitude to invest in them especially in a down turn.

2 Likes

Yep, but they never had a year where they were down 90% either.

intercst

3 Likes

They came awful close during the great depression and it took 25 years for them to get back to even. Imagine holding through that.

1 Like

All of the above is true.

1890
1921
1922
1929

Tariff war
Mass unemployment
Deflation
Great depression

If we cut taxes later this year, 7 months or less, the bondholders will want to know how we pay them.

1 Like

That is how the city of Flint fed it’s residents contaminated water. The “emergency manager” (appointed by the JC Gov the state had at that time) had one priority: make sure the city did not go BK, so that the money interests that held Flint bonds were paid in full. So the city residents suffered. Even better, in spite of the water being useless/harmful, residents were required to pay their city water bills, so the money interests could be paid.

Steve

3 Likes

You are right. 90% in 1995 though. Biggest loser year, -21% in 2008.

1 Like

I’m quite sure it was absolutely terrible. In fact, it was so terrible that that particular time and only one other time in recorded stock investing history were the worst possible times to begin a retirement withdrawal, and is in fact what limits the prudent withdrawal rate to about 4%.

Now considering how awful and terrible that was (holding an index for 25 years before recovering), there is something way more awful and terrible. All the people who bought individual stocks, really strong growing stocks, like the Bank of the Unites States, or like Forshay, or Marmon, or thousands of other prosperous and growing companies. Their capital, their entire investment, went to zero, never to recover, not in 25 years, not in 50 years, not ever.

But what if you had put the 10,000 into Cisco? or JDS Uniphase? Or AOL? All darlings and showing great growth at the time. The Apple and Microsoft argument is a bad argument for two reasons:

  1. You literally have to choose one or two (or 5) great stocks (great over the 30 years) out of thousands of stocks. Or even if you limit to good growth, out of hundreds of stocks.
  2. If everyone suddenly decides on those few great stocks, the price goes up RIGHT AWAY and then it doesn’t provide anywhere near as good returns for subsequent investors. Not everyone can be in the few top stocks, it is literally arithmetically impossible.
  3. In the 60s/70s we had the “nifty 50”. Strongest and best stocks that “everyone” wanted. Well, “everyone” bought, and the prices rose, more people bought, and in the end those later investors did NOT prosper overall. Certainly not for 30 years!
3 Likes

I consistently underperformed the market for about 30 years with overpriced mutual funds and bad stock picks. Turns out you can save enough for retirement anyway as long as you consistently live below your means and save and invest at least 15% of your income.

Admittedly getting away from overpriced funds and bad stock picks over the last 15 years with low cost index funds and ETFs has also helped.

2 Likes

That would only happen to people who hold and never sell. That is why I have rules in place to sell stocks that are in a down turn. You can always buy them back when they start going back up if they do. The idea isn’t to hold a stock through thick and thin but to grow your portfolio.

You mean like @intercst did? That is what I have been talking about Mark. Csco still hasn’t come back. If you would have sold it on 4/12/2000 when it broke through the 50sma you would have saved yourself a lot of heart ache. It was a decisive break and would have been a big warning.

Now you would have been probably really excited about Csco because it made you a lot of money so on 4/27/2000 you probably would have gone back in with a 1/4 or 1/2 position but when it went back below the 50sma you would have been out. Then you would have noticed all the chop as it went up and down and stayed in cash then on 9/11/2000 when it dropped below the 200sma you would have not been looking at it anymore.

That is how I would have played that with the tools I have now.

Just like I did on Celh

and Elf recently

I am back in fully invested but if we take another leg down I will be back out.

1 Like

Dear Andy,

In the full catastrophe of the human condition, it is important to be right with things.

If Trump survives the Democrats coming back to power in 2027, he will reverse much of what he is doing. He has nothing written in stone.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/05/health/trump-abortion-pill-case.html

The main thing he would do later in his term is increase taxes on the wealthy.

Bold statements? Okay.

Meanwhile we are going into a great depression. Don’t hurt yourselves.

Says the guy who has been saying we are going to have a recession for 3 years, Proving Peter Lynch’s point over and over and over.

Dear Andy,

Your make believe world involves me. You are putting words in my mouth.

As long as you understand that.

Meanwhile you are betting as a market goes up before it goes down.

You seem to think your words just go into the wind and everyone has amnesia or worse.

Leap1

WendyBG

Nov 2022

Wendy,

If you look at 1980 it was not much of a recession time wise. The prior recessions during the demand side part of the cycle were shallower than the supply side recessions.

Yes we will have a recession, could have declared one this year almost, but a shallow recession. The current lay off headlines are in tech. The workforces are massive and these layoffs are good sized but not the soup of bankrupt companies.

I am following my system and it seems to work better than your crystal ball. I don’t mind you having an opinion that we are going to have a recession every year but it is worth exactly what I pay you for it.

1 Like

Dear Andy,

I have thought the market was overbought since the end of 2022. That was two years before the top. Sue me. Fool.

You can play for every penny and the market will eat you. Try another strategy.

Play a longer game.

Now since the beginning of this year I see the global economy going into a depression. You are putting words in my mouth that I saw that prior.

You are too emotional. You can’t follow things well.

I do not pretend to know what you were doing two years ago. But right now you have no clue.

LOL I think you are the emotional one Leap spouting your nonsense. I have never seen someone so intent on getting everything wrong.

I was making money just like I am now. But that was 3 years ago Leap, not two. It’s a shame to have been out of the market for 3 years. If that is your long game, you need to find another game.