I’ve long been a skeptic of the idea of an Apple Car, for many reasons including some noted in this thread. I’ve especially been skeptical of fanboys in our Apple communities as well as industry commentators from far afield who seem to think that Apple has some inerrant magical ability to revolutionize any field it enters with that special “Apple design magic”.
To be fair, Apple has indeed revolutionized more than its share of electronics fields – computers and operating systems, portable music players, smartphones, and smart watches, to name some obvious product lines.
But in parallel with those, I watched people everywhere proclaiming the Apple Television (not the streaming box) would revolutionize the television (hardware) industry, and no product came of it.
I was primed for skepticism regarding an Apple Car, despite all the reporting about Apple’s activity in the area. My refrain was “I’ll believe it when they start selling a product.”
In the meantime, it always struck me as something Apple didn’t need – not just that Apple didn’t need the product line but, perhaps as important, Apple didn’t need the headaches. Apple didn’t need to figure out a whole new industry’s worth of supply lines, manufacturing logistics, tooling, an entirely different kind of labor force, and – perhaps the biggest headache of all – government regulations. And as touched upon elsewhere in this thread, Apple typically outsources its consumer electronics manufacturing. As far as I know, to take a relevant example, Tesla doesn’t do that.
So why did Apple waste so much money and effort on Project Titan with no product?
It turns out that they probably did produce something, and it’s not CarPlay: Patents.
Googling “Apple car patents” brings up a lot of articles and discussion, and it’s hard to gauge the value of Apple’s car-related patents, or whether they’re really as many as other car-related patents granted to other companies. It’s not unreasonable to question the value of a patent portfolio. Many patents go unnoticed – and unenforced – for years. But at least the patents are there, and Apple is definitely aware of the importance of patents, as with Masimo’s infringement claim against Apple’s blood oxygen sensor in the Apple Watch.
Consider, in 2022, MacRumors – citing Nikkei and Tokyo analytics firm Intellectual Property Landscape – noted that Apple had filed for and published 248 car-related patents since 2000.
The numbers of patents filed ebbs and flows year to year. Are they worth anything? Will the investment in Project Titan pay off with licensing fees instead of an actual car? I have no idea. I claim no expertise in patents and the auto industry. Time will tell.
-awlabrador