John,
Buy and Win has a very interesting way of building an income producing portfolio.
However, a lot of the securities that he holds are much better suited for a non tax protected account.
I recommnend that you do a serious “Saul” analyisis of his portfolio. It will not take long he had around 10 securities. Then do a “Saul” like analysis of the larger positions in Saul’s portfolio. It will be illuminating.
Buy and Win makes a lot of sense, as does Saul. So much so that if I ever master the “Saul” method, I will attempt to master the “Buy and Win” method.
However, other than practicing the evaluation method condensed in the Saul FAQs on the various equities, I do not recommend you attempt to do both methods at the same time.
I evaluated a few, 8 or so “Saul” stocks, then my biggest holding, 70
percent of my net worth, AT&T, and I practically had a heart attack. I liquidated AT&T and put the money into three broad ETF’s. (The only real choices in my 401k) I find it amazing how risky “safe” stocks can be.
I have followed Saul for a couple of years, and only last April started putting money into “Saul” type stocks. I have done well, but in this market everyone is a genius.
I have my little “Saul” account fully invested and another larger account 50 percent invested. My big, 401k is fully invested but the majority is in broad ETF’s with some in a bond. (I borrowed money, I get a good interest rate for the money I loaned, and I have intimate knowledge of the borrower.)
Even my non-Saul stocks, Google, Amazon, CDW, and Village Farms get the “Saul” review before and after they are purchased.
The common thread between Buy and Win and Saul is the 100 percent investment. It forces you to sell something to buy something. In this way you have to find something better before you can trade. With cash, the bar is low. You only need
to buy something better than cash. This makes for sloppy analyisis.
Cheers
Qazulight