Early Retired, 25-year software engineer now understands the lies he was told

intercst

3 Likes

I dunno. I think “purpose” is a trap. You’re trained that you must have a purpose. I like not having a purpose. Yeah, I watch YouTube videos. Some are fluff, but some are instructive (e.g. science, cooking). But I also travel. When I’m in the mood, I edit my recent photos from wherever I travel. I do whatever I’m in the mood for, in fact. Whatever will make me happy at that moment.

I agree with him about wealth. At some point it is just keeping score. We have enough to cover our lifestyle, which is solid middle class. Our health scares in 2019/2020 made me realize that. And that if you put off what you want to do till “someday”, you may end up suddenly having a situation (health) that prevents it. Possibly for the rest of your existence. We were lucky our scares didn’t result in that. But one day we won’t be able to travel as we do…just part of aging regardless of some crisis.

9 Likes

Having more stuff don’t make us happy. Doesn’t me, anyways. Basic needs plus some extra for travel, charity, helping others, hobbles. That’s all I need.

Deep human relationships are the key.

Autonomy through financial independence is a worthy goal.

5 Likes

Same guy talking about his family budget ($60k/year, family of 4) and FIRE:

Nothing new if you’re already familiar with FIRE.

Our family of 5 spends quite a bit more than that, but we all drive, need cell phones, etc.

6 Likes

Yep. I never saw any “purpose” in sitting in a classroom or an office, but I realized it was necessary to tolerate it long enough to earn sufficient money to fund my exit.

intercst

4 Likes

I would differ on the classroom. I like learning stuff. Sure, it’s purpose was to make me educated enough to get a good job so I -eventually- wouldn’t have to work anymore. But I like learning stuff. It’s been several months, but I like watching NOVA and other nature/science programming. We just got back from a cruise, and a lot of the onboard activities were lectures by folks knowledgeable about history and science. Plus, no homework! So I could just sit back and take it in. So, if I’m happy, that’s good enough to serve as a purpose for my needs. It lessens the experience if I have to study for exams and such. but I didn’t regard classrooms as a necessary evil.

But that’s just me.

7 Likes

I like learning stuff, too. But you don’t need to sit in a classroom to do it.

I can read a text a lot faster than listening to someone explain what’s in it.

Most of the 15 minute videos on youtube could be reduced to one 8-1/2 X 11 sheet.

The engineering school I attended prohibited professors from taking attendance, or including “class participation” in your grade. If you thought you could learn Fluid Mechanics by reading the text, have at it. But you still had to hand in the homework and pass the exams.

It was a much more time efficient way to get an education.

intercst

4 Likes

…which is why it’s somewhat irksome when people post a video with no comment or discussion about what the video’s argument is, or why they’re posting it. As was done in the OP here. If this software engineer has thoughts about the “lies” he was told about work, maybe the person who watched the video and decided to link it here could give us a two or three sentence overview of what those thoughts are.

11 Likes

I like learning stuff, too. But you don’t need to sit in a classroom to do it.

Skool was the biggest impediment to learning. First, they made it nearly impossible to learn while simultaneously destroying your desire to learn anything else. It was the 80/20 rule. 80% of the students ruined it for the 20% of the students who were trying to get an education. And don’t get me started on the teachers.

I can read a text a lot faster than listening to someone explain what’s in it.
Most of the 15 minute videos on youtube could be reduced to one 8-1/2 X 11 sheet.

Even I’ll admit some things need to be explained but yes, 15 mins videos have about 2 mins of relevant data and it’s mostly obscured by “content.” i.e. excess rambling to fill the other 13 minutes

The engineering school I attended prohibited professors from taking attendance, or including “class participation” in your grade. If you thought you could learn Fluid Mechanics by reading the text, have at it. But you still had to hand in the homework and pass the exams.

Man, if I had heard of that school I might have gone to college myself.

It was a much more time efficient way to get an education.

At the age of 30 with no formal classroom smoke blowing time, I cold tested out of degrees in History, Sociology, biology and just missed one in mathematics. If I had taken those tests within 4 or 5 yrs of HS I’d have at at least scored the minimum. College (except for the bs you have to put up with) can’t be that hard. (Another institutional lie btw. No, you DON’T use that stuff after high school unless your job requires it. The kids were right. The teachers were wrong.) You only need to be reasonably well-read to pencil-whip your way through at least the first 2 years of college.

And I know what you’re thinking about the history and soc. Hey I didn’t want to have to do lab courses. I already had a job and just wanted one of those pedigrees. The degrees were irrelevant.

And I didn’t go to some elite preppy high school. It was a pretty plain vanilla Catholic school so I wasn’t surreptitiously specially groomed. It was shut down about 4 or 5 yrs ago.

What does it mean to “test out” of a degree?

I asked Google. It said:

“No accredited university lets you take one giant test to get a full bachelor’s degree. Instead, you stack multiple individual test credits together.”

4 Likes

You want me to do more work than linking the video ??? Come on. {{ LOL}}

intercst

I didn’t take “one giant test” and I didn’t say I did. Why would you even bring that up? But I was shocked at how many schools actually let test your way through. That’s why I gave it a try. But it is, as I’ve seen it, restricted to the liberal arts/humanities/non-technical degree fields for pretty obvious reasons.

They’re not doing that any more – too many students were flunking the Competency Exam required for graduation, and they went back to the system where you just collected credit hours and didn’t have to demonstrate you knew anything.

https://web.wpi.edu/News/Journal/Spring97/plans-col.html

{{ The importance of the graduation ceremony assumed leviathan proportions in the minds of parents unable to participate. One set of parents would not leave President Edmund Cranch’s office. Some students who failed the March exam could not bring themselves to tell their furious parents until the last minute. We became increasingly concerned about what some failing students might do in their state of depression following the exam. One student actually disappeared for two weeks, which caused enormous concern until he turned up in Marine boot camp at Parris Island, S.C. The name of the examination was also a problem. One father wrote to me complaining that he had spent $50,000 only to have his son declared “incompetent.”

The percentage of students failing the Comp became a constant, like Pi. It was right around 30 percent every single time the examination was given. About 20 percent of students received a grade of Distinction (equivalent to an A). Many of us became increasingly concerned about the cause of the failures, their validity, and our ability to deal effectively with failed students. If a student failed because he did not know enough thermodynamics, the answer was simple - take the needed course work. But some students had top grades in all the courses they might be expected to take, but could not handle a comprehensive problem. We organized problem-solving seminars for them, tried to boost their self-confidence, and let them practice with old examinations. It helped, but not that much. }}

intercst

1 Like

So, did they just spook on the test?

*But some students had top grades in all the courses they might be expected to take, but could not handle a comprehensive problem.

That could be a “teaching” or presentation problem. I suppose one could be quite expert in every sub-component but not be able to “follow the larger thread” and put it all together.

I suspect that’s true today.

As I explain in a post up thread, the engineering school I attended in the 1970’s (WPI) had a Competency Exam as a graduation requirement that 30% of the students failed on the first attempt. You were then sent for remedial education to correct any deficiencies. The problem was that despite top grades in all their classes, some students could not handle a comprehensive problem and reach a solution.

intercst

1 Like

In “real life” engineering you’re “solving a problem and producing a cost effective result”. Being a good test taker doesn’t always produce that ability.

In my first job out of college at Corning Glass, after about six months, one of the senior engineers said to me. "You know when we hired the MIT grad in the next cubicle last year, he didn’t know anything. We had to show him where to buy drafting instruments so he could make construction drawings and he’d never seen the “Steel Handbook” or the “Concrete Design Manual”, etc. (Of course, the MIT grad was a quick learner and got up to speed after a few months.)

We didn’t know what to make of you (i.e. intercst). You came in here with your own drafting machine and all the required reference manuals, and were immediately productive. We’d never seen anything like that."

intercst

1 Like

The guy who hired me out of academia said words to the effect of “you got a masters, and that showed you could learn; and the interview showed me how you think”. I was a physicist (astro!) hired into a job populated by EEs.

He had unique interview questions. He said I was the only one who ever got them all correct. But college/grad-school showed him I could learn, and it also taught me how to think analytically (hard sciences tend to do that, or you end up flunking out of them). He could teach me what I needed from there.**

I still couldn’t design a circuit to save my life. But I could look at a layout and figure out what individual gates were doing. A quick chat with a designer, and usually I was set.

**Even EEs aren’t really taught failure analysis, which I moved into after being hired. You have to be taught it on the job. I may not have known a flip-flop when I saw it, but I could tell them “this line is shorted to that node” when I was done.

6 Likes

Some people, while knowledgeable, are incredibly bad at taking tests. They just froze. Test taking is a skill.

Back when I taught on the university level, I had several students who performed terribly on tests even though their attendance and classroom engagement were excellent, and they delivered solid written work. After I concluded that they did know the material, I ended up offering a few the option of oral exams. My recollection is that most did quite well.

2 Likes

I asked you what you meant by “tested out of degrees in History, Sociology, biology and just missed one in mathematics.”

It sounds like you are saying you have degrees in History, Sociology, and Biology, which you got by “testing out”. I just didn’t know that was possible.

Gemini: Can you test out of a degree in Biology?

You cannot test out of an entire biology degree, but you can test out of introductory general education biology courses using exams like the Biology CLEP exam

1 Like

Yes, but I am not writing or speaking for the ages here. I was not awarded the degree in biology because I didn’t want to take time off from work to do the lab and other lab-related courses. Which of course changes nothing vis a vis the academics. Yes, I guess it sounded cornfuzing but wrt just how difficult a bachelors degree is you’re petty-fogging the situation. All those PHD’s and multiple MA’s and MS’s in Biology and other fields who designed th3 tests and analyzed/graded the results said "Kid if you score ‘X’ on this test even we 'll concede you know as much as we would expect somebody who sat through four years of college and actually worked would know. That’s them talking, not me.

Yes, I took a ton of Clep and Dantes tests (which btw were so easy they were a joke) but the coup de gras for upper division credits and the BS was the Graduate Record Exams. (which I understand are no longer a thing but were still in use then)

1 Like