Fed's Overnight Reverse Repo and systemic liquidity

Yesterday, @eldemonio wrote, “With the Treasury issuing gobs of short-term treasuries, money markets are chasing the higher yield and pulling liquidity out of the ON RRP. With the ON RRP buffer at practically zero, further QT and the rebuilding of the Treasury General Account (TGA) will suck liquidity out of the financial markets….This move away from the Fed’s facility will force new or renewed treasuries to be absorbed by private investors….With the bazillions of dollars of treasuries that are expected to be issued to fund the TGA, the depleted ON RRP will result in the market being less capable of absorbing them without a total freak out.

Potentially, this could create a domino effect of tightening credit / short-term funding, higher yields as competition for liquidity increases, and dogs and cats living together.”

@DrBob2 wrote, “I disagree. The balance is the total of how much money the Fed is lending overnight.”

@eldemonio wrote, “Oh, that’s why you disagree. You’re mistaken.

You think the ON RRP is a facility for the Fed to lend money. It’s the opposite. The facility borrows money from banks and money market funds, giving them a short-term treasury as collateral. Why would they do that? To provide a floor for short-term rates when there’s excess liquidity in the markets.”

I decided to research this because low liquidity in the banking system can cause a financial crisis. In fact, the Federal Reserve measures Financial Stress which is a sure-fire indication of banks being unwilling to lend to each other except at high interest rates.

Notice that there is a difference between a routine recession like 2001 (when the dot-com stock bubble burst but there wasn’t a financial crisis) and the financial crisis years of 2008 and 2020.

As the unofficial weather reporter for METAR for over 15 years it’s up to me to detect an approaching financial crisis like the red spots on an Oklahoma thunderstorm radar.

The first thing we have to realize is that the subject is liquidity – cash that can pay out immediately. A bank can have plenty of assets, even excellent assets, but only cash is cash. Silicon Valley Bank collapsed even though it had plenty of long-term Treasury bonds because they didn’t have the cash to pay a run on the bank and the bonds had lost value due to the rise in interest rates.

A financial crisis is always a crisis of cash. So overnight money is key.

Since I don’t know anything about Overnight Reverse Repo (ON RR) I asked Google Gemini.

The Federal Reserve’s Overnight Reverse Repurchase Agreement Facility (ON RRP) is a key tool used by the Fed to manage monetary policy and maintain control over short-term interest rates.

@eldemonio is correct. The Fed is not lending money to the banks. The ONRR facility is a place for banks to park their excess cash overnight.

The banks will park their excess cash where they can get some interest. If all the banks have excess cash the interest for transferring the money overnight would be low or zero. After all, why would a bank pay interest to another bank if they also have excess cash?

The Fed wants to be able to control “the lower bound” of overnight rates. They offer a slightly higher interest rate to any bank that wants to park cash.

The Fed controls the commercial banking system. Until recently the banks could hold reserves in the bank (the way I like to keep some cash at home just in case). But since March 2020, the reserve requirement for all depository institutions has been set to zero. This means that all reserves held by commercial banks at the Fed are now, by definition, “excess reserves,” and the total “Reserve Balances with Federal Reserve Banks” is a direct measure of this.

The Fed keeps track of this.

Before 2008 the banks didn’t keep their excess reserves at the Fed. But after 2008 the Fed opened this facility where they paid interest to the banks to park their cash reserves at the Fed. But the banks still kept some because there was a reserve requirement. Notice how the amount at the Fed suddenly jumped in 2020 when the Fed said that the banks don’t need to keep any reserves overnight.

This chart shows the daily interest rate (or “award rate”) that the Fed offers to its counterparties in these overnight reverse repo operations. It’s an important series to watch as it, along with the Interest Rate on Reserve Balances (IORB), sets the floor for the federal funds rate and other short-term interest rates.

The federal funds rate is the interest rate at which banks lend money to each other overnight to maintain their reserve balances.

When the Fed required banks to maintain reserve balances the fed funds rate was important because a bank that ran short would borrow overnight from another bank to maintain their reserve balance. Now that they don’t have to maintain a reserve balance they still need liquidity for normal business operations so they may still need to borrow from another bank.

The Fed now controls the fed funds rate not by managing the quantity of reserves, but by setting a floor and a ceiling for it using two key administered rates:

Interest on Reserve Balances (IORB): This is the interest rate the Fed pays to commercial banks on the money they hold in their accounts at the Fed.

Overnight Reverse Repurchase Agreement (ON RRP) Facility: This facility allows a wider range of financial institutions, including money market funds and government-sponsored enterprises, to deposit excess cash with the Fed and earn a specific rate. Like the IORB, this rate acts as a supplementary floor, as these institutions won’t lend their cash out for a lower rate than what the Fed offers.

The ON RRP is more important because it is open to some very big cash handlers not just banks. Some of these are “Shadow Banking System” financial intermediaries that facilitate the creation of credit across the global financial system but are not subject to the same regulatory oversight as traditional, chartered depository institutions (commercial banks).

The Fed’s decision to include these non-bank institutions was a key lesson from the 2008 financial crisis. The crisis highlighted how the shadow banking system, particularly the repo market, could seize up and cause widespread financial instability. By providing a direct channel for these institutions to access the safety and liquidity of the central bank, the ON RRP facility helps to reduce systemic risk and improve the overall functioning of financial markets.

The Fed changed its whole philosophy from a “scarce-reserves” system to an “ample-reserves” system. It offers the entire range of major financial actors a safe minimum interest rate on their cash reserves. The Fed can keep an eye on these reserves since everyone will park overnight cash reserves with the Fed unless they can find a higher rate somewhere else.

The Covid windfall of fiscal and monetary stimulus in 2020-21 shows as a sudden cash increase which pretty quickly stabilized into a channel that has been constant since then.

Of course, this is an aggregate view of all the ON RRP participants. Individual actors could still get themselves in trouble. But the Fed’s quick action to clean up Silicon Valley Bank shows that they are alert and won’t let the situation get out of hand in terms of allowing a failure to propagate.

@eldemonio pointed to a sharp decline in Overnight Reverse Repurchase Agreements: Treasury Securities Sold by the Federal Reserve in the Temporary Open Market Operations as a possible indicator of a future problem.

The banks still have plenty of cash (which they park overnight at the Fed). This shows up in the high stable level of the bank reserves chart.

But the ON RRP includes other financial actors besides banks. Money market funds are finding better yields from Treasury bills than from the Fed. This is why the Fed hasn’t needed to do ON RRPs much lately.

The last factor that @eldemonio mentioned was the Treasury General Account (TGA).

Fluctuations in the TGA impact the financial markets directly. It would be ideal to maintain a moderate, stable TGA. But the ever-increasing government deficits will require issuance of more Treasury debt.

Since money market funds offer higher interest than bank accounts a huge amount of cash has been deposited in money market funds ($7.3 Trillion in 1Q25 and growing fast).

After the Fed began raising rates in early 2022, there was a massive shift of money from bank deposits into money market funds, with billions of dollars moving from the banking system to the MMF industry. This was especially pronounced in 2023 following a series of regional bank failures, which prompted some depositors to move their money into the perceived safety of government-backed MMFs.

Conclusion

Systemic liquidity must include all forms of immediately available cash equivalents. Google gave this answer but it’s Shabbos and way too much work for me to do today.

Key Components of Liquidity

Bank Reserves: This is a core component of liquidity in the banking system. The relevant chart is Reserve Balances with Federal Reserve Banks (WRESBAL).

M1 Money Stock: This represents the most liquid forms of money in the hands of the public, including physical currency and checking deposits. The series is M1 Money Stock (M1SL).M1 Money Stock: This represents the most liquid forms of money in the hands of the public, including physical currency and checking deposits. The series is M1 Money Stock (M1SL).

Money Market Funds: The assets held by money market funds are a significant part of the financial system’s liquidity. The relevant series is Money Market Funds; Total Financial Assets, Level (MMMFFAQ027S).

Treasury General Account (TGA): While not a source of liquidity, the TGA is a key factor that drains it. The balance in this account, Liabilities and Capital: U.S. Treasury, General Account (WTREGEN), is an important part of the liquidity equation.

How to Create a Combined Chart on FRED

You can build a custom chart on FRED by following these steps:

  1. Go to the FRED website and find the WRESBAL series.

  2. On the chart page, click the “Edit Graph” button.

  3. Click the “Add Series” tab and search for the other series (M1SL, MMMFAQ027S, etc.).

  4. Add each series to your chart. You may need to adjust the units and frequency to be consistent, for example, by converting monthly data to a weekly average.

By viewing these series together, you can get a more complete picture of the liquidity dynamics between the central bank, the commercial banking system, and the broader shadow banking system. [end quote]

Bottom line: Many thanks to @eldemonio who opened this analysis. However, in order to get a complete picture of liquidity and risk to the markets all the factors (including money markets) must be included.

Wendy

16 Likes

No, thank you for taking the time to spell it out. Like I said earlier, I’m not a great explainer of things…

3 Likes

Wendy,

Thanks for turning alphabet soup into something intelligible.

Jeff

6 Likes

You’re welcome.

Look at it this way.

The Federal Reserve creates cash out of thin air. All of this cash exists until the Fed “retires” it. (cf. John Hussman.) I may decide to spend it on a house and bonds. You may decide to spend it on traveling and stocks. But somebody holds the cash even if it doesn’t yield any interest. (As was the case for several years because of the Fed.)

This chart shows how the Fed inflated the amount of cash (by buying Treasury and mortgage bonds) and is now gradually shrinking it.

The amount of cash is also increased by banks and the “Shadow Banking System” by fractional reserve lending and the many shenanigans that create multiple loans with the same asset as collateral. (We discussed this last week.)

On the other hand, the government reduces cash by taxation and by selling Treasury securities to fund operations and deficits.

So far, the increase in cash from the Fed and commercial operations (including banks) have been dramatically faster than the decrease. This is why real interest rates are so low and prices of all assets are so high. (Stocks, bonds, real estate, goods and services.)

A financial crisis will only occur if the holders of cash refuse to lend the cash to borrowers because they don’t trust that it will be returned even if it’s only loaned for overnight.

That’s not in the charts right now. With the Fed as aggressive lender of last resort it won’t happen again soon, if ever. (Though never say never.)

Wendy

4 Likes

However, government spends all of the cash and returns the cash. While the economic theory argues that the cash is removed from private consumption, but government spendings returns the cash. General economic theory argues when government spending is high it crowds the money availability for corporates and individuals, but most of the budget is actually returns that cash to corporates and individuals.

Fractional reserve still doesn’t allow the banking system to lend money it doesn’t have, i.e., it lends the deposits it takes, the fractional reserve allows them to take more deposits.

The real “American innovation” is securitization via collateralization. All you need is a bank or someone to collateralize an asset and issue a loan against it. Then wall street will securitize that asset, then create derivatives on that asset…

It can be mortgage or it can be baseball cards… But “securitization” allows the loan to be moved away from the “lender” for ex: banks which issued the original loan, from their books, this allows the bank to originate more loans, thus earn more fees… etc.

But, the key is it allows banks to issue more loans by recycling their capital, thus increasing the credit available. Thus in my view securitization has dramatically increased credit availability than the ‘fractional reserve’.

4 Likes

Ever soooooo gradually. At the rate they are shrinking it (about $1T over the last 18 months) it’ll take about 10 years to shrink it to zero. And that’s assuming we don’t have any more little bumps like March '23.

This sounds very similar to the broken window theory fallacy.

I am not sure what exactly you are saying… if your point is, I am ignoring what the money available to “corporations and individuals” could have achieved…

Today government spending is a very big part of GDP, and government borrowing is the engine behind that, so government borrowing is actually a net positive to the economy. Of course, that is my view…

It is wishful thinking that federal balance sheet goes back to pre-pandemic or pre-GFC… No. They money created by FED still exists in the system, thus federal balance sheet has to be at certain level to support the money in circulation. Federal balance sheet is not going back to old levels, certainly not in 10 years.

2 Likes

Don’t forget to adjust for inflation. That FRED chart is in current dollars rather than real dollars, so that to compare anything pre-covid means at least a 25% adjustment. The real Fed current balance sheet is less than 10% greater than it was ten years ago.

DB2

1 Like

Wendy,

I did not realize how out of date I am on this topic.

All of this begs the question where is the risk?

It exists and we old fogies are very out of date. The banks are okay in a crisis? Explains Jamie Dimon sleeping well.

The money markets funds are not? Their funds are just run away. De facto the Money market funds are bank deposits. Are they regulated to only investing in paper? Where are they invested?

The MMFs do they dwarf the banks in their reserves?

Whose got the beef?

Adding….

AI has the beef. The stock market bubble is predicated on MMF money on the sidelines.

What follows is from a spam newsletter from Yahoo. I never signed for this letter. It is publicly sent to tens of millions of people. It’s circulation is wanted by Yahoo and the author.

Sunday, September 07

:waving_hand: Good morning! Here’s what Brian Sozzi, our Executive Editor, is thinking about this week.

:robot: Why AI stock tremors are ripping through portfolios

I talk to a ton of people each week in my role.

Truthfully, the volume has gotten so large that by Friday, I usually 1) have forgotten my own name, 2) start talking like the people I’ve talked to, and 3) drive right by my own house on the way back from work.

Not complaining at all, just keeping it real.

The positive to the litany of conversations is that there’s often one “comment of the week” that leaves an impression. This week, the comment belongs to C3.ai (AI) founder and executive chair Tom Siebel.

Siebel is an OG in tech. I always enjoy chatting with him — he’s blunt and knows his stuff. Makes for great insights (and great interviews).

His company’s stock got slammed on Thursday morning after reporting a rough quarter and yanking its full-year outlook. Siebel stepped up to the mic on my Opening Bid morning show — alongside his new CEO, Stephen Ehikian — and dropped this golden nugget:

“In this market out there, where you have companies trading at 100 times revenue, you have companies trading at half-trillion-dollar valuations that lose $10 billion a year, I mean, a lot of these valuations are crazy. Come on, C3.ai is a bargain stock,” Siebel said.

I have no clue if C3.ai is a screaming buy after a 55% year-to-date tanking — I hung up my analyst game 10-plus years ago. I do think C3.ai needs to restore investor trust, and that will take the rest of 2025 to sort out. Ehikian, fresh out of working for the Trump administration, has a lot of work to do in a short period of time.

But Siebel’s valuation comment is of interest in light of the pressure we are seeing in AI stocks. It all began late last week with Nvidia (NVDA), as investors reassessed the company’s quarter and outlook. Shares are down 6% in the past five trading sessions.

The AI selling has persisted this week.

Salesforce (CRM) and Figma (FIG) got drilled on Thursday after their quarterly numbers didn’t wow. It’s clear the hype on their earnings calls wasn’t enough to paper over soft areas of the earnings reports. Growing concern on the Street centers around the pace of AI demand by corporations, given what looks to be a slowing US economy.

The overarching concern is whether valuations have plateaued for a sizable chunk of AI stocks. I fancy they might have, given the sharp negative reactions.

“After the very strong returns, the bar for positive surprises is elevated. This makes the group vulnerable to even a little bit of bad news or simply results that are not good enough relative to high expectations. We are also seeing greater differentiation within tech — so a rising tide doesn’t lift all boats,” Truist co-chief investment officer Keith Lerner told me.

“Key drivers of recent tech weakness include: a recent MIT paper questioning artificial intelligence’s (AI) near-term productivity impact; OpenAI CEO Sam Altman warning of a bubble in AI; a few recent mixed earnings reports from tech names, though broader trend remains robust; tech’s strong balance sheets and low leverage make them less reactive to rate cuts compared to cyclical or capital-intensive sectors,” Lerner added.

All of that reads as proceed with caution before buying the AI stock dip.

Tech valuations will be top of mind as I descend on the Goldman Sachs Communacopia tech and media conference in San Francisco next week. I will be live on air from the conference on Monday and Tuesday with a steady drumbeat of big market-moving interviews. So, add this one to your calendar and tune in all day Monday and Tuesday! You can easily watch here, on the Yahoo Finance app, or on all major streaming platforms.

3 Likes

A minor correction, RRP, is for all eligible institutions like money market funds. Bank reserves are exclusively bank deposits. BTW, RRP is now almost zero…

Sep 15th is tax deadline and you are going to see a major withdrawal from bank reserves, something that could potentially disrupt markets

3 Likes

Inflation report this week.

I am expecting Inflation to drop as unemployment rises. When is still a bit of a wait.???