Here it is! My July portfolio summary!

Here’s the summary of my positions as of July 31st. Right at the end of the month this time as the 31st fell on a Friday. The summary is longer with more detail this month.

At the end of June I was up 35.0% on the year, and the S&P 500 was up 2.1%. It’s now the end of July and I’m up 48.8% and the S&P is up by 2.2%, so I was up 13.8% more in July while the S&P was up 0.1%. I’m ahead of the S&P by 46.6% this year, after seven months.

Please note that I don’t ordinarily measure against the S&P, or any other index, but since I started this board I post my results against it since the MF uses it as their yardstick. However, I am amazed that my entire portfolio is up by 50% in seven months in which the market, or the S&P anyway, has been just about flat. Please don’t expect another 50% in the next five months. :wink:

My big three, SWKS, BOFI, and SKX, are still the same and make up roughly 55% of my portfolio. This is even more than they made up a month ago. It’s not because I’ve added to them, it’s because I did such a good job of selecting my highest conviction stocks. These stocks have simply grown faster than the rest of my portfolio, especially with the huge advance by Skechers. BOFI and SWKS seemed to take turns being first and second depending on their daily price variations, but the big run-up in SKX after earnings moved it into first place the last couple of days. I definitely will cap each of them at below 20%, as I said that I would a couple of months ago, but I hope that the rest of the portfolio will grow enough with them that they won’t bounce against the ceiling.

I noted last month that I had added a bit to my BOFI in May at $92. I bought a lot more in June between $92 and $94 (even though it was already an oversized position), and then bought some even a little above that. It’s now at $122.8, which is very gratifying. This month I added a bunch to SWKS between $91 and $102, mostly after it fell back after great earnings because other chipmakers had poor results. It’s not clear yet how that will turn out. In fact, all three of these stocks have already announced great earnings. SKX rose $22 over the next two days, BOFI rose $9.50, and SWKS… fell because other companies (not them), in the same sector, had weak earnings or weak outlooks. Oh, well…

Here are the big three:
SKX at 19.1% - trailing PE is 34.6 - ttm earnings growth is 107%
BOFI at 18.4% - trailing PE is 23.05 - ttm earnings growth is 39%
SWKS at 17.8% - trailing PE is 19.65 - ttm earnings growth is 76%

Their 1YPEG’s are 0.32, 0.59 and 0.26 respectively.

My big three make up about 55% of my total portfolio. Although these are high-conviction stocks, that’s a REAL lot in three stocks. They are in entirely different fields: microchips, banking, and retail clothing. This wasn’t by design, but it spreads the risk. Their average trailing PE is 25.8, which I’m quite okay with. Their average rate of growth of trailing earnings is 74.0%, which is even better. You’ll notice that these big three positions all have low 1YPEG’s. It’s not really meaningful to average 1YPEG’s as it is with PE’s or rate of growth, but if you are curious, they average at 0.39.

This is not an inherently risky portfolio, even after the run-up. For comparison, consider UA, which I recently wrote about with a PE 107, a rate of growth of earnings last year of 27%, and a 1YPEG = 3.96 !!! To me, THAT’s risky.

Next, I drop down to a group of three large to middle size positions (INBK, AMBA, and CRTO), which are much smaller positions than my big three at between 8.6% and 7.8%, but I also have strong conviction about them. I have been saying for months that I especially had strong hopes for INBK but couldn’t take a bigger position in it because it’s such a small company with lack of liquidity, and that I already had a much larger position than was probably prudent for me. It indeed has shot up since then, and has grown on its own to become my fourth largest position in spite of my concerns. Combined with my big three, these six make up about 80% of my portfolio. Only INBK has reported to far.

INBK - PE is 19.1 - earnings growth is 123% - 1YPEG is 0.16
AMBA - PE is 47.5 - earnings growth is 114% - 1YPEG is 0.42
CRTO - PE is 47.5 - earnings growth is 220% - 1YPEG is 0.22

Note that all three of them grew earnings at over 100% for the trailing twelve months.

Next I have two stocks with middle-sized positions between 5.0% and 5.4%.

ABMD - PE is 67.3 - earnings growth is 112% - 1YPEG is 0.60
INFN - PE is 39.8 - earnings growth is 142% - 1YPEG is 0.28

I like both of them, but I haven’t built quite as big positions in them because of
A: Not enough money,
B: Not quite as much conviction,
C: As far as ABMD, I’m still learning about it, as far as INFN, it’s in a tough industry.

These eight so far make up about 90% of my portfolio. Seven of the eight I had last month. ABMD is the only new stock. My big three are still the same, my next three are still the same and INFN was seventh last month, so 7 of my top 8 representing about 85% of my portfolio haven’t changed at all. I’m emphasizing this so you won’t think my messing around with my tiny try-out positions represents big changes in my overall portfolio.

Finally I have four small positions between 2.4% and 3.0%. These are EPAM, ANET, SEDG, and SNCR, and a tiny try-out position in SWIR at 0.6%

EPAM - PE is 31.4 - earnings growth is 33% - 1YPEG is 0.95
SEDG - PE is 103 - earnings growth is 200% - 1YPEG is 0.51
ANET - PE is 47.5 - earnings growth is 85% - 1YPEG is 0.56
SNCR - PE is 23.4 - earnings growth is 32% - 1YPEG is 0.73

I reduced the size of EPAM somewhat this month as it was fairly priced (1YPEG about 1.00), and used the money to add to other positions. Please note that all of these small positions together total just about 11.6% of my portfolio, and they have higher PEG’s, so please DON’T get all excited about them and go take a big position in one of them because I’m in it! (The positions add to a little more than 100% because I have about minus 2.4% in margin). The top six stocks, about which I have strongest convictions, make up 80% of my portfolio.

Last month I indicated that I’d been prospecting for new stocks the last couple of months and had bought some small positions but that these were definitely not high conviction stocks., and that I was not really sure of any of them. They were try-out stocks. To do this I had reduced my positions in CELG and WAB, which were growing slowly in relation to their PE’s, and also in XPO, which is growing revenues enormously, but not yet making money. Note that I have no gripe with any of these, and certainly have like WAB and CELG, (and a wait and see attitude about XPO), but when looking for additional funds this is where I raised money. I’m now out of these three, and have reinvested the cash.

Those try-out positions last month were, INFN, SEDG, SWIR, PAYC, SNCR, FB, LOGM. Since then I have dropped PAYC, FB and LOGM, three of the smallest positions I had last month.

INFN moved up to a 5% position. I still have small positions in SEDG and SNCR, I added one in ANET, and EPAM moved down to a small position. As I mentioned I have a tiny keep-on-the-radar position in SWIR.

What I do is “modified buy-and-hold” . Of my biggest positions I’ve had SWKS and SKX over a year, BOFI for two and a half years, CRTO for over seven months, INBK for about 11 months and EPAM for six or seven. I kept CELG and WAB for over two and a half years each. In no way is this “short-term trading”. When I buy a stock, it’s with the idea of holding it for as long as circumstances seem appropriate, NEVER with a price goal or the idea of trying to make a few points. If I try out a stock in a small position, and later decide it doesn’t fit and I sell it, I really don’t care whether I gain a dollar or lose one. I just sell out to put the money somewhere better.

Since I began in 1989, my entire portfolio has grown enormously. If you are new to the board and want to find out how I did it, and how you can do it yourself, I’d suggest you read posts #4 through #8 at the beginning of the board, and especially the Knowledgebase that Neil keeps for us (currently post #9286) , which is a compilation of words of wisdom, and definitely worth reading if you haven’t yet.

Hope this has been helpful.

Saul

88 Likes

Fantastic Saul, and not just the returns. I really like your monthly reviews. It is very insightful.

Andy

1 Like

Thanks Andy

1 Like

Saul.

Second what Andy says. I love this board, and your monthly summary posts are terrific. I really appreciate what you do, and wanted to come out of the shadows to let you know it.

Have a great weekend!

Brian

1 Like

Andy - I wholeheartedly agree!!

Saul, I’ve learned so much from you in such a short while. I learn even more with your portfolio reviews - I see it in action.

No one is forcing you to publish a single word. Some folks even give you heat about it. I’m sure at this point you’ve learned how to let the criticism slide. But I just wanted to emphasize that there are many here who can not express our appreciation deeply enough for the information and observations you so generously share.

I am confident that I am not alone when I tell you I am very grateful for your willingness to openly share your investment philosophy, knowledge and activities.

Thank you Saul.

13 Likes

I noted last month that I had added a bit to my BOFI in May at $92. I bought a lot more in June between $92 and $94 (even though it was already an oversized position), and then bought some even a little above that.

What was it that spurred you to add to an oversized position? What was it you saw that told you, “now is the time to buy more” as opposed to just continuing to hold what you had?

For the last two or three months, I’ve been wanting to add to BOFI. That’s mostly because of my increasing confidence in it, and becoming more comfortable with more concentrated positions. Therefore, I’d like it to be a bigger position. But the price kept drifting up, with no blatant pullbacks. Since it’s growing more slowly than most others I like, I never managed to pull the trigger and buy more.

In hindsight, it did drift down for about a week, right before earnings. I was tempted, and almost bought more shares. I think that if it had drifted to below $110, I might have bought more.

Even selling puts on BOFI don’t pay all that well. (Otherwise, that’s a plausible way to wait for a dip in price.)

There are other positions (INFN, ANET) that I have also been thinking about adding to, but haven’t acted yet. I did manage to add to CRTO.

-Mark

1 Like

Saul-

I discovered this board a couple of months ago, mainly because several Fools I try to follow post. What I have found in this part of the community is nothing short of (not sure which superlative to place here :slight_smile:

I am amazed at the willingness of this group (led by you!) to freely share their research, skills, and opinions. This information has value far beyond the positions held in various members portfolios. Kevin’s sheet is tremendous and I find myself spending a significant amount of time reviewing information posted there.

I am benefiting and profiting as a direct result of the efforts of those involved in this board, and I am very grateful for that. I hope to add more to this community in the future, but at least for now, please know how blessed I feel to be here with you.

Gary

21 Likes

What was it that spurred you to add to an oversized position in BOFI? What was it you saw that told you, “now is the time to buy more” as opposed to just continuing to hold what you had?

Mark, I can’t really remember. I guess I just thought that the results just were great each quarter and the price wasn’t recognizing that. (Don’t forget, today’s price is about 30% higher).

For the last two or three months, I’ve been wanting to add to BOFI. That’s mostly because of my increasing confidence in it, and becoming more comfortable with more concentrated positions. Therefore, I’d like it to be a bigger position. But the price kept drifting up, with no blatant pullbacks. Since it’s growing more slowly than most others I like, I never managed to pull the trigger and buy more.

I’ve said it before, and I really mean it. If you want to take a position or add to a stock, don’t get anchored on what the price was last week or last month. Buy it. There are so many sad stories like that. People who kept waiting for a better price and the price kept going up. Now that the price is $123 or so, would you care whether you bought it at $88 or at $92? Really? I’d always prefer to buy a company with good results that are pushing the price up, than the reverse.

Look, I started buying BOFI at $28, I guess almost three years ago, but I added in the 30’s and in the 50’s and bought a lot more when it came down from $106 to $65 for no reason (and I had Fletch reassuring us each time they had great earnings reports). That’s how it got to be such a big position in the first place. It never occurred to me to think that I shouldn’t buy it at $75 because it had been $28 a year or two before. It was a good buy at $75 when I was buying it. And that’s the same way I felt when I was recently buying it at $92-$94.
I hope that helps.
Saul

39 Likes

July Summary link now added to the “additional info” link at the right of the page.

-FrickNFool

7 Likes

And some charts to go along with it…
http://stockcharts.com/freecharts/candleglance.html?SWKS,BOF…
http://stockcharts.com/freecharts/candleglance.html?ABMD,INF…

3 Likes

Saul

Your posts changed my perspective on investing. Thank you for sharing your expertise.

Sekhar

I stumbled across this post (it was the top post from 1 year ago) and decided to run some simple math. Here is a table of the 1 year returns for each of the holdings - YIKES!


SKX	-55%
BOFI	-44%
SWKS	-27%
	
INBK	-34%
AMBA	-50%
CRTO	-11%
ABMD	 26%
INFN	-63%
	
EPAM	- 7%
SEDG	-37%
ANET	-13%
SNCR	-15%
	

Only one winner out of the 12 - and that is just in one year. I wonder how much money could be made shorting the Saul portfolio and holding for 1 year…

tecmo

39 Likes

Tecmo - I think you have to look at the performance over the period that Saul holds these stocks. He has an unbelievable record of buying at the bottom and selling at the top and doesn’t seem to hold through a period of prolonged downturn. Most of the stocks you have mentioned Saul no longer holds and has signaled when he has sold.
Ant

4 Likes

Tecmo - I think you have to look at the performance over the period that Saul holds these stocks. He has an unbelievable record of buying at the bottom and selling at the top and doesn’t seem to hold through a period of prolonged downturn. Most of the stocks you have mentioned Saul no longer holds and has signaled when he has sold.

Thanks - I am aware that the strategy is to buy and sell (rather than buy and hold - he has made that very clear and this is not a critique of either his performance or the strategy). I just found it very interesting to look back even one year (which I consider a short holding period) and see how dramatic the changes (all loses) have been.

I wonder if Saul has ever considered shorting and not just selling; that way you make money both ways :slight_smile:

tecmo

2 Likes

Agreed and I think it shows that stock selection is nothing without discipline to enter correctly and exit correctly and never to hold blindly or out of pure hope when an investing thesis changes nor to price anchor regardless.
Ant

1 Like

Only one winner out of the 12 - and that is just in one year. I wonder how much money could be made shorting the Saul portfolio and holding for 1 year…

Interesting post Tecmo!

Two comments if I may:

  1. This more than emphasizes how facile Saul is with moving in and out of stocks (reported to this board only in retrospect). It is a highly managed portfolio with pretty substantial turnover at least this last year. It also suggests that the average investor following his buys may be doing less well than they think if they are holding on to the losers…a point I have made many times before that Saul dumps stock with very little remorse (other than BOFI). But for those who are buying and forgetting…high high risk!

  2. Since the criteria for selection is usually progressively increasing earnings…one company miss or less than stellar future guidance and whoosh…stock is gong to get hammered.

This is NOT a slow and steady investment style and clearly required a great deal of attention/management so for those trying to replicate, you are likely going to be married to your computer.

8 Likes

I have said before that I do not comprehend Saul’s claim that his investment style is ‘modified buy and hold’. I find it curious because the description is bound to be misleading and dangerous to novice investors who find their way here. It is noticeable how some of them fall deeply in love with their holdings (I’ll love you forever) while Saul’s own level of commitment to his true loves is, ah, somewhat less faithful!

Saul is a trader. He is a very good trader but he is a trader. Names in his portfolio (not their weighting) may last a certain time, but that relatively short time does not warrant the description ‘modified buy and hold’ which implies a quite different style and for most holdings a much longer period.

I respectfully suggest to our generous host the abandonment of the wildly inappropriate description ‘modified buy and hold’. (I offer ‘fundamentals-based, high-turnover investing’.) The original post here, displayed on the knowledgebase, would be a good health warning, together making the situation crystal clear.

52 Likes