Hey Guys, let's try this again!

Here’s the MF Post of the Day from Mar 30th. I thought it was a wonderful read. Negative interest rates are just a tiny part of this article. It’s about the economy and the future of the stock market from here. It’s a very interesting collection of observations. Anyone have any comments?

Saul

Board: Macro Economics

Author: Goofyhoofy

So, you know, Guido, how we doin?

Help Wanted Ads: From the National Federation of Independent Businesses, the “hard to fill rate” is back where it was in 2005. Bloomberg calls it “a clear sign of economic recovery and maybe that wage hikes are on the way.” From 25% in 2005 to 7% in 2009 , and now back to 25% as of February, 2015. Businesses have been sitting on their openings, afraid to hire, but that time is past. There’s enough demand, managers are starting to search for employees again.

The “Quit Rate”, from the US Bureau of Labor Statistics. Peaked as high as 2.25% in 2005, fell to 1.3% in 2009. Now back to 2%. The “quit rate” is seen as an indication that the supply of good jobs is growing, and that people are becoming more mobile in their careers. This number always dips during recessions as people hunker down and do not voluntarily leave either for other opportunities, which are fewer, or to start their own business because of poor economic conditions. The “quit rate” moves with “confidence”, and it’s rising.

Revolving Credit: Americans return to the old habit of charging it. Credit card debt hasn’t climbed back to 2008 levels but it’s heading that way. Revolving credit balances have climbed every year for the past four years.

Cost of Weddings: This number fell dramatically in the wake of the financial meltdown, almost 20% from $34k to $28k. It still sounds expensive to me, but the number has rebounded to $32k and continues to climb. Mrs. Goofy and I rented a yacht and took the family for an all day cruise in Boston Harbor. We brought some catered food and a Justice of the Peace. Easy peasy. We weren’t kind to wedding planners in 1984, and neither was the fall of Lehman some 25 years later.

German bonds: Bonds maturing as far out as seven years carry a negative interest rate. Yep, if you give them $1000, in seven years you’ll get back less than $1000. Now there’s a vote of confidence in the way Europe is handling things. And there is no shortage of takers in European markets!

Cost of Shipping: The Baltic Dry Index has fallen 2/3 in three years. This measures the cost of transporting raw materials by sea. This can indicate two things: long lead times in ship building and the consequent finishing of new and larger ships just as Chinese and European demand drop, or, uh, one or either of the above, separately.

The Strong Dollar: It makes for scary headlines, but it’s great for American travelers and not so great for US exporters. On the other hand, companies in the S&P get almost half their revenue outside the US, so maybe it’s not quite such a big deal anymore, at least to us investors.

Hedge Fund Performance: it’s been pathetic since 2008. While the S&P 500 index is up 130%, aggregate hedge fund performance is up a piddling 30%. Take out the 2% annual fee and the 20% “performance” tip and you’d have been almost as well off putting the money in a coffee can on the kitchen table.

Wall Street: To quote from Bloomberg: “In the industry the only thing more satisfying than making money is complaining about how hard the banking life has become. So many new rules and such little gratitude! Don’t buy it. Wall Street is doing fine.” Financial sector stocks have risen 62% in three years. That’s better than the S&P index over the same period.

The Almighty Apple: continuing to defy the law of large numbers, Apple’s profit rose 38% in the most recent quarter. The company still has a ways to go to become the first Trillion Dollar Corporation, but it’s no longer outside the realm of possibility. It needs another $250b in market cap. Closer than anyone has ever been.

The housing market bull has been a godsend for Home Depot and Lowe’s, whose stocks have climbed $80 to $115 and from $45 to $70 respectively in just the past year. Homeowners see their houses as good investments. Again. Welcome to 2006!

Vacancies: OTOH, it’s harder to find a place to rent in the US than at any time since 1993. Damaged credit scores, stagnant wages, and difficult-to-get mortgages are keeping millions from buying and are putting pressures on rental pricing. Good for landlords and capitalists, not so good for people with economic issues to face.

Bitcoin. Remember Bitcoin? It was going to take the worry out of that endless printing press specie? It’s gone from $1100 to $250 in the two years and some months since November 2013. Soon you’ll haver to carry it around in a wheelbarrow to buy a loaf of bread! Then again, jump the starting point back another six months and it’s doubled. Oh, for the stability of the US dollar! Oh wait! Non-sequitur.

Almonds: The price of almonds is up 50% in two years, as drought ravages California, where 80% of the world supply grows. Maybe not for long, if the rain gods don’t speak soon. Let’s hope that it isn’t the Anasazi thing all over again.

Everything: Mostly positive. Unemployment keeps coming down, more slowly than some would like, but then there are also a lot of “long term discouraged” who are re-entering the market, which artificially slows the numerical drop. And there is the baby-boom, in which a lot of front-edgers decided to retire, and are now finding some employment opportunities that didn’t exist in 2008 and 2009 and who are rethinking the whole thing.

Then again, China is slowing down, oil prices are cratering, and some are insisting that it’s all about to crash, any moment, because of, uh, revealed truth, data be damned. Advice: ignore those with the sandwich boards crying “Doom! You’re kicking the can down the road!” and assume that the economy is getting healthier, the dollar stronger, consumers more confident, and the market rich (oops, and maybe a little overvalued. Well, you can’t have everything.)

I happily acknowledge cribbing much of the data above from Bloomberg, The conclusions about doomsayers are entirely my own. Well, and most sentient people, if you asked them.

2 Likes

Anyone have any comments?

Saul,

I generally share this guy’s views. I believe that the US economy is see more growth than people are expecting right now. I believe low energy prices have not yet benefited global economic expansion but I think they will. Furthermore, I believe that the world is beginning to enter a sustained period of falling energy prices driven by innovation, solar, plentiful NG, etc. Image what will happen if energy were free…it won’t be free but it is heading in that direction. Economic prosperity must improve dramatically under such circumstances (my long term view). I think the biggest risk to increased global prosperity is geopolitical which hopefully will not be disastrous. In the short term (next 1-3 years), I think it’s likely that we will see continued growth in the US stock markets.

The above is my world view. What am I doing about it? I am pretty much fully invested in stocks (90%+ of my net worth with the rest in real estate). I am loading up on as much low cost (under 4.5%), long term (30 year) debt as possible to take advantage of historically low interest rates. I am using this debt to leverage my real estate holdings and to invest the funds in stocks. I expect that my returns will (by far) exceed my cost of capital (which is about 3% including the tax benefit). I understand the risks, but I believe that the benefits significantly outweigh the risks. Just my opinion and what I’m doing.

Chris

6 Likes

Anyone have any comments?

Goofy has some very smart posts. I’m not sure this is one of them, a collection of anecdotes that pretends to be some kind of forecast. I couldn’t and wouldn’t build an investing strategy based on it.

My preference is to look for significant macro trends like the advent of the Information Age, Financial Engineering, and Fracking.

Information Age

Ma Bell used to be the world’s largest company when they had the telephone monopoly of the USA. It wasn’t all from the value of the service but from the monopoly profits they could extract as beneficiaries of regulation that was supposed to protect their customers, not Ma Bell. But the lesson came when Judge Green broke up the monopoly. I bet on the technology but Lucent went broke while the Regional Bell Operating Companies (RBOCs) got rich. Freed of regulatory blinders, the truth came out: the information they brokered was more valuable than the technology they used to do so.

Exxon took over from AT&T as the largest market Cap company when Judge Green broke up AT&T but it didn’t hold the position long. In time Apple took the lead. Apple isn’t really a high tech company, it’s a consumer electronics provider and their products process information, our most valuable commodity, more valuable than energy at this point.

Financial Engineering

While financial engineering can produce huge amounts of wealth it has the seeds of its own destruction: debt and faulty algorithms based on the wrong mathematics. As Nassim Nicholas Taleb says, it’s bad black swan prone.

Fracking

Fracking is less of a game changer than the first two but it still is incredibly powerful, strong enough to put OPEC and Russia on the ropes while lifting the American economy. Not that it is a smooth transition as the fallout from the oil price collapse shows. Still, the market is doing its job, getting rid of excessive energy profits.

The Industrial Revolution and all that preceded it was governed by the economic law of Diminishing Returns. Information, which has no physical limits, brought the economic law of Increasing Returns to the fore. It’s what allowed Intel, Microsoft and Dell to overtake IBM. It’s what allowed Apple to overtake Exxon. It’s what made Sabre more valuable than the rest of American Airlines. It’s what is powering Google, Priceline, Zillow, TripAdivsor, FaceBook, BitAuto and many more.

Another important trend is the recognition that the economy is not like physics but more like biology, if not a living organism, an emergent property of intelligent life. Classic economic theory is giving way to the Science of Complexity.

These macro happenings are better predictors of and better guides to the future than Goofy’s collection of anecdotes.

Denny Schlesinger

5 Likes

Denny,

I really enjoyed your point of view. Looking for big trends which will drive the world economies over the next decade or so can lead to profitable investments.

Information dissemination & the Internet is clearly one avenue for ideas. I like FB, TRIP, LNKD, TWTR, …, offers ways to capitalise on this trend. I also like companies that create new opportunities by creating special-purpose, closed, market places and ecosystems. Things like Apple’s iTunes store can be very profitable because they are able to lock people into their ecosystem and it can have strong network effects. More users, more developers, and the cycle continues.

Anirban

I’ll add on one other macro-economic factor not discussed. I’ve been reading a lot of Ken Fisher books lately. One trend me mentions in multiple books is the trend of the US presidential cycle to align with the market. His theory is that the first half of a president’s term often comes with the president pushing through one or more mandates of some sort, which makes half of the people mad and businesses jumpy. But by the 2nd half of the term, after the midterm elections, there tends to be gridlock, which business likes.

He shows the numbers since 1900 and it’s quite compelling (86% of the time, the back half years of a president’s term are positive in the market). So… since we’re in the 3rd year, just another factor that is bullish.

Here’s an example of Ken’s thinking on this, though not recent and not the full work:

http://www.forbes.com/sites/kenfisher/2014/06/18/investors-e…

2 Likes

I’ll add on one other macro-economic factor not discussed. I’ve been reading a lot of Ken Fisher books lately. One trend me mentions in multiple books is the trend of the US presidential cycle to align with the market. His theory is that the first half of a president’s term often comes with the president pushing through one or more mandates of some sort, which makes half of the people mad and businesses jumpy. But by the 2nd half of the term, after the midterm elections, there tends to be gridlock, which business likes. He shows the numbers since 1900 and it’s quite compelling (86% of the time, the back half years of a president’s term are positive in the market). So… since we’re in the 3rd year, just another factor that is bullish.

Very interesting Chris. It’s amazing how many things influence the market.

Saul