How Capitalists Destroyed Capitalism

Gift link to an article in today’s NYT. Curiously, when I read it a few hours ago the title was “How Capitalists Destroyed Capitalism” (at least that’s how I best remember it.) When I went looking for it again the headline has changed to “The Finance Industry is a Grift. Let’s Start Treating It That Way”

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/06/opinion/capitalism-industry-financialization.html?unlocked_article_code=1.KFA.dBaU.SVDbh1vFLA1_&smid=nytcore-ios-share

The piece is written by the Chief Economist at a Conservative Think Tank (American Compass), and both liberal and conservative mantras and heroes come in for scorn. I have to say it’s one of the most interesting and insightful pieces I’ve read in recent months.

It begins with a humorous - and explanatory - walk through a song in “Mary Poppins”, and proceeds from there to shred the current “financialization” of everything, to the detriment of, well, what capitalism used to do, which is to build things and make life better.

Now it’s often used to strip assets, defranchise actual builders of things in favor of rent seeking, and widen the economic gaps on which our society is based.

I hope you read it, it’s really that good.

If you’ve taken an economics course — or if you at least enjoy classic family movies — you probably remember the scene: Young Jane and Michael Banks have come to visit the bank where their father works. When the bank’s chairman, Mr. Dawes Sr., snatches Michael’s tuppence, the boy shouts: “Give it back! Gimme back my money!” Overhearing the kerfuffle, a customer assumes the institution is refusing to return a customer’s deposit. Next thing you know, the bank run is on.

The incident nicely eases economics students into both the complex plumbing of the financial system and the important and unpredictable role of human psychology in markets. But it’s the preceding scene we care about here. That’s the one where the old bankers sing to Michael that instead of spending his tuppence, he should give it to the bank to “invest as propriety demands” in “railways through Africa” and “dams across the Nile.”

“Tell them about the ships!” Dawes shouts to his fellow bankers. “Fleets of ocean greyhounds … majestic self-amortizing canals … plantations of ripening tea, all from tuppence, prudently, thriftily, frugally, invested in the, to be specific, in the Dawes Tomes Mousley Grubbs Fidelity Fiduciary Bank.”

Not the catchiest song, but a compelling account of the economic engine that powered the British Empire and financed modernity: real, honest-to-goodness banking. People gave their savings to bankers. The bankers invested the capital, creating actual productive assets in the real world. Those useful endeavors generated profits, a portion of which were returned to the bankers, who paid some as interest and kept some for themselves, well earned for their consolidation and productive allocation of resources.

Since Mary Poppins’s day, the financial sector as a whole — investment banks, hedge funds, private equity firms, cryptocurrency platforms and all the rest of it — has exploded as a share of the United States’ gross domestic product. It now claims the highest share of corporate profits and attracts the highest share of top talent from top schools, in part by offering the highest compensation. But actual business investment has declined, to an average of 2.9 percent of G.D.P. over the past decade from 5.2 percent in the 1960s, when the film was released.

17 Likes

Really, all you need to do is be alert to the level of skim, scam and fraud associated with the transaction at hand, and then seek a work around if possible.

The stock market wouldn’t be an attractive investment if it came with the transaction costs of the residential real estate industry (and prior to the deregulation of stock brokerage commissions on May 1, 1975, they were close to the same.)

I made a post earlier today on the 67% difference in price on a recent purchase between Amazon and TEMU – and TEMU somehow delivered the item in less than 24 hours, just like Amazon Prime without the $149 annual subscription fee.

You don’t have to win the lottery, start a business or invent something to get rich. Merely preventing yourself from getting screwed will take you most of the way there.

intercst

3 Likes

I’ve started watching ”The Industry”. I’m hearing/reading raves about it, but so far it just isn’t really hitting me. It’s about Big Finance. All I’m getting from it is the naked greed, and moving money around without actually doing anything. And the culture of excess (e.g. there is a LOT of sex…I’m not a prude, but even for me it is excessive without advancing the story at all), some drugs, and “bring more money in”.

I don’t really know if investment banking is that way, but if it is they should shut it all down. It does nothing, accomplishes nothing, creates nothing. It’s just moving money around for no other purpose than to jump on a 25cent discount and then flip it. Unlike a real bank that gives loans, and pays interest to depositors.

This would be “capitalism” run amok.

6 Likes

Except the real estate industry comes with the advantage of an 80%, maybe even 90% margin loan which even the best broker won’t give you. Better than that, you are mostly in charge of your real estate investment, where with a stock (index funds excluded*) you have almost no control whatsoever except to exit.

*Broad Index funds used to be thought of as “balanced”, but as we have seen in the past couple years, they are not. Today, for example, 10 companies account for 40% of the S&P index, and all 10 are in the same sector. If that sector takes a dump, the index will get hammered. Of course that can be true of real estate as well, 2008 being the most obvious example, but that happens with real estate much less often.

6 Likes

Guilds are designed to protect members from competition. Until the WWW and E•Trade there was no way to get around the NYSE which is (was?) a guild designed to protect stockbrokers from competition. Many years ago I had a year when I broke even after paying $50K in commissions. Time to switch to E*Trade. Every so often someone invents a way to break the camel’s back. Instead of whining over “Grift” one should look for ways to avoid getting stung.

Or look for innovative ways to benefit from the system. I think I found one, selling covered calls. While options date back to antiquity it was only in 1973 that the Chicago Board of Option Exchange (CBOE) created a standard way of trading options. Standards are a necessity to create liquid markets. Early on stock options were mostly a way to gamble. I believe selling covered calls is a way to optimize stock portfolios.

Image you invest a million bucks in a business. To be profitable the business has to get busy making products and finding paying customers. Now imagine buying a million bucks worth of stocks. If you follow the Investing Bible you think about buying and selling stocks but not about those stocks making a profit (barring dividends). That’s like Scrooge McDuck putting cash in a safe.

Selling covered calls is the equivalent of running your million dollar business. Interestingly, one should avoid dividend paying stocks which tend to be called at dividend time.

Suppose you can get a 5% premium in 30 days. You would double your money in 20 months while a 2% premium in 30 days would double your money in 4 years and 2 months – CAGR 18.89%.

The Captain

Waiting for the rain to stop to take a walk. Global warming sure is dishing up a cold Winter.

4 Likes

To pick a nit – not all 10 are in the same sector.

NVDA Technology
AAPL Technology
MSFT Technology
AMZN Consumer cyclical
GOOG Communications services
META Communications services
AVGO Technology
TSLA Consumer cyclical
BRK Financial services
WMT Consumer defensive

FWIW, Walmart now sports a PE of 46, the same as NVDA.

DB2

2 Likes

Picking a nit with your nitpicking. There’s significant overlap.

NVDA - Data centers - Invested heavily in AI
AAPL - Hardware and bootlicking
MSFT - Cloud computing - Invested heavily in AI
AMZN - Cloud computing - Invested heavily in AI
GOOG - Advertising - Invested heavily in AI
META - Advertising and corrupting children - Invested heavily in AI
AVGO - Data Centers - Invested heavily in AI
TSLA - Fanbois and Broken Dreams
BRK - Insurance and a little bit of everything
WMT - Awkward shopping experiences

Clearly there are ways to avoid the grift on the individual level. Some of us care about more than just ourselves.

The point of the article is that financialization is bad for our society and economy. It funnels shat tons of $$$$$ to non-productive hoarders of wealth. Because of this, it’s sucking top-talent away from professions that solve difficult problems, improve society, and drive humanity forward.

9 Likes

Yeah, that’s a pretty small nit.

2/3 of Amazon is from cloud, AI, and other tech services. TSLA is mostly hype - about future tech services. Meta is digital, as are Microsoft and Google. NVDA and AVGO are chips, (largely) based on the AI buildout. If this “sector” hits a speed bump, all passengers are going to get injured.

But I plead guilty on Berkshire, and to a pretty good extent on WalMart, although their web based business is coming on fast.

5 Likes

Which is why it may be a good idea to diversify toward a broad market equal weight index, as Wendy has pointed out a few times in the past.

https://www.spglobal.com/spdji/en/indices/equity/sp-500-equal-weight-index/#overview

There are also other broad equal weight indices that one can invest in: Equal Weighted Indexes | MSCI Indexes

Pete

3 Likes

How gallant!

Wow!

Gee!

The Oren Cass op-ed in the OP frets about financialization.
“These are symptoms of financialization. That’s the term for making financial markets and transactions ends unto themselves…”

Sort of. Any good economist should ask “And then what?”

After a debt refinancing, does the money disappear into the ether? No: it goes back into a business that can then reinvest the money into developing new products, typically at better terms and rates. When a company buys back its stock, what happens to the money? It gets deposited in someone’s brokerage account, where it can be invested in other stocks and bonds. And then what? The money gets put into businesses that use it to develop new products. There is no separate “financial” economy that does not ultimately connect back to the so-called real one.

DB2

I don’t think the argument is that there is a separate, independent “financial” economy. I think the argument is that the “financial” economy is very much tied to the real economy. The stated problem is that it’s sucking resources away from the real economy.

That’s quaint. When a company buys back its stock, it’s using money that could be reinvested in the business to develop new products to award shareholders. Do some shareholders take their earnings and invest in other companies? Sure. Do some shareholders keep their earnings invested in the company that’s proven to conduct stock buybacks? Absolutely.

Financialization describes how debt, securities, and other financial mumbo-jumbo “products” recycle money, not that money disappears. Often, it gets recycled, many, many, many times. With each transaction, someone is making bank and not adding any productive value.

7 Likes

It may be the equivalent of running an insurance business. Because in essence, when you sell options, that’s what you are selling, insurance against a sudden move up/down in the stock.

In general, it only happens if the dividend exceeds the time value. At least for rational people. If it happens when this isn’t the case, then you got lucky because an irrational person out there handed you all that time premium for free.

True for put options which protect the buyer from falling prices but I don’t see it for call options, the buyer is hoping to make a profit, i.e, gambling.

That might be true, I haven’t researched it, but for me it’s a deal breaker, a complication to avoid.

The Captain

So you’re running a casino! :laughing:

Same mathematics, not the same heavies.

The Captain