If a thread hasn’t had a post in 6 months or more, rather than posting in it, please start a new thread. When I see one of these reanimated threads, I go the the end, click on tracking, and click on mute. I am sure that I am missing TMF brilliance but I have better things to do that reread rehashed arguments.
Thanks.
2 Likes
I would disagree. Adding on adds continuity and makes it easier to follow developments over time. Not to mention following up on earlier predictions.
DB2
One has to follow the history in order to learn from it
7 Likes
I will rethink my position.
4 Likes
Alternatives:
put a link to the old thread if it has been dormant for a long time.
Maybe make the new thread have the same name, with a “part 2” suffix
Mike
I do not follow a lot of those. I do not delve into them.
BUT I like them. I like to see that someone actually took time to see the past and the present. At times I am proud of what I wrote ten months ago. Other times things have resolved one way or another.
This level of maturity is not recognized enough.
7 Likes