IREN earnings - big miss and big drop in share price

Coupled with Bad timing in the bitcoin world, IREN missed big time this quarter. The stock has been punished hard in the last couple weeks, but is still down today while most everything else is turning back up.

This quarter - IREN missed estimated earnings by -188.89%, reporting an EPS of $-0.52 versus an estimate of $-0.18.

Last quarter - The company beat on EPS by $0.93

I can’t see a compelling reason to hold at this points, perhaps a reason to revisit if they turn things around in the coming quarters.

Takeaways

- AI pivot is not going to be quick or painless

- no new deals announced, there was hope that something would be coming along with the earnings. They say they are still negotiating , but sounds more like hope than anything concrete

11 Likes

I think you’ve completely missed the point on IREN. They are not about this quarters earnings and they are getting further removed from bitcoin every day (even if the market hasn’t caught onto this yet).

What is important is they have:

  1. Secured great financing terms for the GPUs to support the Microsoft deal.

  2. Confirmed execution is on track to support $3.4B ARR by end of 2026.

  3. Construction on track to meet Microsoft contractual commitments.

  4. Retrofitting of Canadian sites in progress alongside advanced customer negotiations.

  5. Added 1.6GW in Oklahoma, bringing their total secured power to 4.5GW (equivalent to power consumption of New York City).

No new deal was announced which was disappointing, but they have a leveraged negotiating position with connected power and most foresee a deal (or deals) coming imminently over the next couple months.

The hyperscalers have announced unprecedentedly large CapEx spending targets, largely geared towards increasing AI related capabilities. This should be extremely bullish for IREN and other AI infrastructure providers.

The misunderstanding of this company by the general market is providing us another great entry opportunity.

Daws

56 Likes

I sold my entire position after-hours when I first read the earnings report. This one can definitely do great things, but to me it has now become a story stock. I am happy to re-enter when the numbers prove the thesis.

18 Likes

If you only look at IREN’s earning miss, you are focused on Bitcoin margins and short-term EPS.

As @dawsdaws pointed out, IREN’s most valuable asset is its 4.5GW power pipeline (including the latest massive 1.6GW addition in Oklahoma).

Hyperscalers (Microsoft, Google, Amazon) all dramatically increased their CapEX spending and are desperate for sites that already have the permits and grid connections to handle massive loads.

Bitcoin miners are typically valued at low multiples of cash flow. AI infrastructure companies enjoy a higher multiples. IREN is currently stuck in the middle, but its underlying assets are shifting toward the latter.

If IREN meets its construction milestones for Microsoft, it proves they can operate at the “Hyperscale” level. From the satellite images and the company’s recent releases, the constructions are on track.

Daniel Roberts IREN’s co-founder with his brother Will Roberts were from Australia’s largest investment bank, Macquarie Bank. They were investment bankers and specialised in power, land, environment, constructions, finances, and etc. They built IREN from a small power company to one of the biggest bitcoin miners in a short period time. Every time the brothers said something, they would deliver on time.

Moving toward a projected $3.4 billion in ARR by the end of 2026 would fundamentally change the company’s financial profile from “cyclical miner” to “steady infrastructure utility.”

The big drop in share price due to the earnings miss is a classic example of looking in the rearview mirror. IREN is spending heavily now to secure the hardware (GPUs) and infrastructure needed for the pivot. This creates a temporary drag on earnings (CapEx and interest) before the massive AI revenue starts hitting the books.

Looking in details, IREN’s previous quarter’s good earning number was due to a one off gain from its capped calls. The bad earning this quarter was due to the stock prices drop caused capped call loss.

The “Big Miss” was essentially an accounting mirror of the stock price:

(Q1) Stock goes up then Derivatives gain value causes “Record Profit”.

(Q2) Stock goes down then Derivatives lose value causes “Record Loss” .

By ignoring these non-cash swings and focusing on the $3.4 billion ARR target and the 4.5GW power pipeline, you are focusing on the factory (the asset) rather than the accounting for the insurance on the factory (the derivatives). The “bears” are essentially selling a house because the insurance policy’s “paper value” changed, while ignoring the fact that a massive new tenant (Microsoft) just signed a lease.

As @dawsdaws noted, IREN hasn’t announced a new deal yet, but they are in a leveraged negotiating position because they own the power. They don’t have to take the first bad deal that comes along; they can wait for high-margin contracts.

IREN’s potential isn’t about how many Bitcoin they mine next month; it’s about becoming a biggest landlord for the AI revolution. If they successfully convert their 4.5GW pipeline into AI data center capacity, the current “earnings miss” will likely be seen as a minor blip in a massive growth phase.

We are looking at the Asset Base (Power + Deals), while the rest of the bears is looking at the Income Statement (Current EPS). In a high-growth pivot, the assets usually tell the truer story of the future.

42 Likes

Yes, fully agree. Although we do not like to see our stocks suffering such big drops as they have this week (it’s been a painful week again) this is about looking to the future and not to the rear view mirror.

In terms of IREN’s future there is much to like and to get excited about as long term investors. They have negotiated, as far as I can tell, an incredible financing deal. They have increased their secured GW by 50%. They will have new clients coming on board as the year progresses - and many of them will be very hungry for the GW that Iren can provide. They have almost $3B in cash on balance sheet, and they are on schedule with their huge onboarding of the Microsoft deal. And they have had a history of solid execution to date. Much to get excited about!

22 Likes

I’m trying out the Posting feature in Youtube for some post earnings analysis. Cross posting what I thought of IREN’s earnings,

As I was preparing for IREN’s earnings I began to realize they are unlikely to post an impressive result on the numbers side. Analysts were projecting 227M of revenue, and the company gave no guidance themselves. However, a majority of IREN’s revenue still comes from Bitcoin mining, and a smaller portion of revenue is from high performance compute. The issue I saw was that the price of Bitcoin was higher in Q3 versus Q4, and I wasn’t sure if analysts had factored that in. I thought there is a good chance they miss their numbers and the market may sell them off, which is what ended up happening initially.

On the narrative side of the equation, the company had been quiet with press releases and news over the past month and a half. I wrote down that I “would like to see another contract announced at earnings”. While the company did not announce another contract, they secured an additional 1.6 GW of power to bring their total to 4.5 GW. The new site is in Oklahoma for the 1.6 GW, with their other existing sites being in Texas and Canada. In the end I believe this announcement is actually better than a specific contract being announced. This addition diversifies the business geographically and regulatory wise.

Additionally I see IREN signing more contracts as a foregone conclusion, whereas adding more power was an unknown factor for how they can scale up. Management said, “We have multiple advanced negotiations underway for larger scale deployments”. They also detailed how they are not looking to sign any contract, but contracts where the economics are in their favor.

To be fair, this business has had their strategy change quite a bit since we first started a position in them back in August 2025. Here are a few key differences,

  • Demand has gone up, customers are asking for air cooled over more advanced liquid cooling just to bring capacity online sooner
  • Financing or borrowing costs have gone down, the company is able borrow at lower rates as their business gains more credibility as well
  • Competitors such as Nebius began raising large amounts of capital and expanding aggressively
  • The Bitcoin price and mining difficulty dramatically altered the economics of their mining operations

The company had originally planned to finance the HPC expansion through the profitability of their Bitcoin mining operation. However the combination of cheaper financing and a lower Bitcoin price made the management team adapt to the new environment. From my point of view the management team has adapted their strategy well.

Another thought I had on this earnings is whether this company has become a story stock if we are making the case that the numbers they are delivering currently are not super relevant to where their business is heading. Typically with a story stock we have no objective measurement of how the financials may look. In this case, IREN has given us an annual run rate target of 3.4B of revenue by the end of 2026. That would mean the company is getting 850M of quarterly revenue at the run-rate. This at least gives a number to hold the management accountable versus, making it a bit different than a pure story stock. The management team has emphasized multiple times they have never missed a deadline as they compare themselves to competitors. Of course if the company does miss a deadline we will hold this against them and re-evaluate the situation from there.

Lastly I will add this earnings report was a tricky one to analyze, and the market found the same challenges as well. We knew the company may be unlikely to post an impressive number. In turn we then have to evaluate the strength of their announcements, rather than some objective barometer such as a revenue or profitability number. Management threw us a bit of a curve ball by announcing a power supply agreement rather than a contract with a hyperscaler. In the end we found this power supply announcement to be superior to just signing another contract which is inevitable. I am still expecting this company to announce another hyperscaler contract before their next earnings as well. Taking all these factors into consideration, I am keeping IREN as a top holding.

61 Likes

Long term I agree, the move makes their potential even higher. But an infinite future that never arrives is no achievement, so we just need to be careful not to let them move the goalposts. All in all, they reaffirmed the guide for end-2026 ARR. A reaffirmation for say, a SaaS company, would be negative – we want a FY guide raise every 90 days. They did another thing that was a positive, but specifically on the ARR guide, this quarter was a disappointment (to spell out my logic, clearly if they had gotten a new contract they would have been able to raise it).

Agreed – we can hold them to this expectation again for the coming quarter. My thesis is that there should be many deals coming, and delay is sub-optimal.

Bear

34 Likes

This is precisely my concern. It is a story right now. After listening to the earnings call, I felt much less concerned than when the earnings release first came out and I sold my position, but now I am approaching it as a new position and asking myself if I am willing to take their word for it, or to wait and jump on once they prove the thesis intact.

If this company is able to monetize the remaining ~90% of power available post-MSFT contract, they should have a massive runway. There should be plenty of time to get in if that is the case. Sure, I might miss some upside.

But what if they are overplaying their hand? They themselves said the major bottleneck is time to data center. Their last deal was announced over three months ago. And they are certainly not short of competitors. Not to mention, hyperscalers may just be looking to do some expansion on their own.

Granted, the bottleneck in this process is energization of which IREN is currently the king. I just need to start seeing the contracts come through, especially with the time crunch being their chief driving factor. I may end up taking a smaller position again, but especially with several other strong names massively sold off, I’m not sure I’m totally sold.

16 Likes

I was very impressed with the quarter.

Like some other posters here, I feel that anyone that is saying this quarter is a miss or sold after-hours (yikes!) wasn’t looking at the right things.

For most of us here, this has never been about current financials (mining) – this is about what the financials will look like over the next 2 years as their AI pivot drives massive growth, from their existing sites & secured power giving them a runway to execute against.

  • With the drop in bitcoin in the end of 2025, it was easy to see that mining revenue would be impacted in IREN’s Q226. Q3 will likely be worse given the big drop over the past week, and AI revenue is not likely to make up the difference until Microsoft starts to kick in.
  • They didn’t announce a new customer. But that is because mgmt is taking its time to find the right partner and best deal.

What I thought really matters, in order (IMHO):

  • Horizon 1-4 is on schedule. Sadly, we don’t see Microsoft revenue until “Q2” (meaning Apr-Jun, their Q426) when they deliver Horizon 1 … I hoped to hear it was coming next Q. It will ramp up heavily from there for the rest of 2026 as Horizon 2-4 are phased in.
  • They announced $3.6B in DDTL funding (asset backed loan facility, where they pull in tranches timed to capex of phases) for sub-6% interest. This is a loan type that CoreWeave popularized, but the yield is better than what CoreWeave got in its current round obtained a few quarters ago (~SOFR +4%). And this DDTL is changing the scope of their ongoing customer negotiations. They can clearly use this same mechanism again to try to land other investment-grade hyperscalers.
  • They lengthened their secured power runway with a new 1.6GW OK site that will get initially energized in 2028 (a starter connection) and have power ramp up from there to the full 1.6GW.
  • They currently have $400M in AI run rate from existing contracts, way above their “end of 2025” (Q226) guide of $200-250M. This will immediately rise to the promised $500M by next quarter (what they’ve been guiding Q326 to). This is all from those 23K GPUs in Prince George, which are finally all in place by likely the end of February.
  • They have 40K GPUs coming in the other BC retrofits over the year, and expect $3.4B in run rate by end of 2026 (their Q227).

Crazy action after hours, as it went from -8% to -25% during the call, to settle the night at -18%. It was then flat by Friday’s open, and ended the day +5%. Someone with better timing than me could have made 30% overnight.

From here:

  • They have Sweetwater energizing its initial 1.4GW in April, and will likely announce a rollout plan from there.
  • They will give us more details about the Horizon 5-10 announced in Q1, from an additional +450MW coming to Childress.

They have 3 areas to sell right now, Horizon 5-10, Sweetwater, and the BC retrofit. Large customers are likely to come over the coming months and eat up large parts of it.

-muji

61 Likes

I don’t think that’s fair to say (as if your opinion is the only right one) and don’t appreciate the direct attack. There are ways to disagree courteously which is part of what makes this board great.

I very gladly sold my shares after-hours at $42/share for over 2x what I paid ~6 months ago. Not sure a “yikes!” is warranted there as that’s more than a 100% annualized return.

That’s exactly what a story is.

There is a huge difference between a proven pathway with continued execution and an early-innings conversion story that may or may not come to fruition. As a BTC miner IREN have a great story that is nearing its end. But as a AI/HPC provider, the story has just begun.

This story isn’t just dependent on Dan Roberts and his team: it is dependent on the hyperscalers and their motives, timelines, and budgets. It relies on timely and profitable deals coming through. IREN may very well seal some excellent deals soon (and I hope they do), but I don’t think it is “not looking at the right things” to not be willing at this time to bet vast quantities of money on this hope. I wanted to see the story becoming reality by this quarterly report with at least one more deal (as I think many did), and they didn’t meet my expectation. Simple as that.

I would be curious what Saul would say about IREN. It is capital intensive (he prefers lightweight). It is not a rule-breaker (business model is being replicated by other miners, also has stiff competition in $NBIS and $CRWV). It is a bit of a first mover (for now) as it has a solid energy portfolio. But certainly I can’t imagine he would say “most of us here” don’t care about current financials. Opportunity cost is a thing. Waiting two years for profitability may be an impediment. We just don’t know!

At the end of the day, I can see great points on both sides. I certainly don’t fault anyone for investing in $IREN as I was just there myself. But in the words of Saul, “it simply doesn’t matter what happens to a stock after you sell it.”

28 Likes

@DoctorRob apologies my Yikes comment came off as an attack on you. It was in meant in reference to the crazy price action afterhours but I moved that part of my commentary later in the post. I did not intend it as an attack on your actions. the core statement i meant was that you and the OP were “looking at the wrong things”. (Aka My opinion vs your opinion)

My point (and other posters) was that my (and i believe most of us in IREN on Saul board here) have thought of it as a story stock all along. So the part i disagree with in your post is that THIS earnings turned it into a story.

I did not want to invest in a cryptominer, even one that scaled up their operation as well as IREN. The whole point of my investment is their AI pivot. It was a story stock from the start based on their site/power portfolio, not an investment in their strong crypto scale up. AI is only a measly 4% of the mix! Yet is 100% of why I invested.

The fall in crypto could be a thesis buster for some (as it seemed to be for you), as the cash flows from that are needed to help fund the pivot. But I agree with the take above that the sub 6% DDTL facility is fantastic news on that front. They are finding funding even as a BTC rug is being pulled.

35 Likes

I am a bit cautious. Right now, we have many companies with GW’s worth of secured power (eg IREN, CIFR, GLXY, WULF, APLD, etc). Yet, despite the “rush” to power datacenters and despite power being the ultimate bottleneck, I am not seeing companies signing deals left and right.

When we step back and evaluate who the customers are, it’s the hyperscalers - MSFT, META, AMZN, GOOG. All these datacenter companies are catering to just four customers. How much bargaining power do they have? What is their moat? Yes, there are differences such as IREN providing the GPUs vs CIFR doing colocation deals, but is that a defensible moat?

Furthermore, all these datacenter companies are announcing gigawatts of newly secured power every month, which undermines the assertion that power is scarce.

Finally, what is to prevent the hyperscalers from preferentially building their own datacenters? Possible scenario - the hyperscalers sign a 5 year deal, take that time to build out their own datacenters, and stop being IREN’s customers. Who wouldn’t cut out a profitable middleman, and add more to the bottom line?

I just don’t sense urgency or desperation from the hyperscalers at this time. Maybe I’m wrong, but I will remain on the sidelines and observe for now.

22 Likes

Good time to stock up? With retail stock traders (read individual investors) dismissing stocks prematurely (contempt prior to investigation—or none for that matter) high growth stocks are even more volatile today than in years past. IREN is deftly ice dancing through an unstable economy plus these flighty stock owners while pivoting to a massive growing market opportunity. These days a reported 20-25% of equity stock trades volume is executed by retail traders (FINRA). As a result, already bumpy rides of high growth companies are gyrating like snowboarders at the Olympics tonight. By comparison pre-Covid individual investors accounted for 10-15% and markets were relatively stable to support their growth spurts. . IREN is by no means a grown up, so I’ll listen to the call, and decide if my money may be put to better use elsewhere. That said, my original reasons for investing in Nebius and IREN remains sound due to unique competitive advantages and successfully landing big dollar contract relationships with hyperscalers. If Microsoft et. al., find these companies pass muster who am I to argue? I’m holding, and may increase my stake by shedding some smaller niche holdings after going through the call and other research. Great insights from the board! Was there a stock dilution to depress the price on top of everything else? Thx!

12 Likes

Adding my 2 cents. I’ll be honest. I have always seen $IREN as a story stock. Can anyone here explain why they would be in $IREN over $NBIS?

The only reason I can come up with is cheaper power. Is that the MOAT for $IREN? Just looking for thoughts of others. I was thinking about this earnings and story…I realized, it’s Saul’s board and he would be all about $NBIS ACTUALLY accelerating revenue Q/Q. I am in both, but heavier $NBIS. Anyways, just wondering what others see besides cheap power. Maybe I’m missing something.

12 Likes

I give you one aspect of some of the reasons IREN is over NBIS:

Based on recent reports, NBIS faces significant, high-stakes risks regarding late delivery of GPU capacity, which is considered the dominant risk to its business model as of early 2026. While demand is extremely high, the company is battling infrastructure buildout bottlenecks.

IREN has the history of consistently delivery its projects. Check IREN’s growth story during the period of BTC mining infrastructure delivery, second to none. History told me IREN is likely to deliver it’s AI infrastructure projects quicker and more efficient than most of the companies mentioned in this post such as CIFR, GLXY, WULF, APLD, etc.

Will

16 Likes

Thanks for these thoughts. I will agree and respond (by selling out) accordingly if NBIS starts to decelerate revenue. I am channeling the Saul wisdom, but that’s the story part of this right? The Saul wisdom with growth stocks is to follow revenue. So far, NBIS has accelerated from Q1/53.3m —Q2/105.1m - Q3/146.1 m.

If the story changes at this earnings (or a future earnings), then I might need to exit, but so far it has been accelerating.

Right now we can’t say the same for IREN, hence we are needing to follow the story for them and not the numbers.

Just to clarify then. There are 2 story points which are 1) cheaper power and 2)on-time delivery of constructing data centers relative to peers.

11 Likes

One thing I am focused on is that many announced datacenters will not come to fruition. In the last month 3 proposed datacenters in the Chicago area have been voted down by residents concerned about higher energy rates, environmental concerns, NIMBY and back up generator noise close to their neighborhoods. One company that follows proposed datacenter progress found that in an 11 state area 2/3rds of proposed datacenters have been delayed and or cancelled. I agree that energy is a pinch point. I asked a relative of mine who works for Open AI and he confirmed this. IREN has 4 DCs up and running, a 5th coming on line this year and a 6th in 2027. To that they have just secured a 2000 acre site in OK. As others have mentioned they have contracted energy in spades. If indeed compute demand is virtually insatiable, I like IREN’s positioning.

24 Likes

Datacenter builds are being turned down by communities. Two have been turned down within 25 miles of my residence. This reality, however, will not in any way reduce the number of data centers that will be constructed. Timing may slip, and locations changed, however, the demand for data and the relentless scent of impending profits will not be denied.

Gray

14 Likes

Hi all,

I believe that expanding secured power by 55%, while increasing the secured to operating ratio from 3.6x to 5.6x implies demand growth expectations exceed the incremental capacity added.

Long Iren, Nbis and Crwv.

Best,

Pablo Ahlers

4 Likes

One quick clarification:

In Ai infrastructure, traction doesn’t first appear in revenue. It appears in secured power and grid interconnection. Revenue follows.
From that perspective, Iren’s capacity expansion reflects forward demand visibility, not narrative.

Best,

Pablo Ahlers

11 Likes