Black,
You asked what you should do about a stock you’re hanging on, waiting to get the dividend. Meanwhile, due to price declines and your failing to have risk-management plan, you’ve lost more in cap-gains in a month’s time than you’ll ever get from a year of dividends.
You claim you did well LAMR, putting on the first position 10/31/16 and the second on 05/04/18, for annualized gains --when divs are included-- of 18.03% and 21.36%, resp. However, when the historical data is pulled from Yahoo --with divs backed in-- the compounded returns are 15.3% on your first position and 18.9% on the second. You need to re-check your math.
The actually achieved numbers aren’t shabby. The first is a tad less than what a B&H indexer in the SP500 would have achieved over the same holding-period (with divs backed in, 'natch), and the second was significantly better. OTOH, YTD, you’re hugely underperforming an asset-class you should have rotated into, namely, a commodities basket, which is yet more evidence that you’ve committed the newbie mistake of falling in love with the company, despite its sucky financial statements.
I also ran a trading systems check on LAMR. Yeah, it would have --theoretically-- been possible to squeeze out better returns than B&H. (In one case, nearly twice as much of a gain.) But not without doing more zipping in and out than any “investor” should be doing.
So, yeah. You can be happy with the money gained so far. But for failing to have a plan on how to manage your ownership of that stock, you’re now giving more money back to the market than should be done --IMHO, 'natch-- which raises the question all of us should be answering for ourselves, namely,
“How much more upside is there to this phony, Fed propped up market and economy, as opposed to how much downside?”
Arindam