I love this board. For me, one of the great things about it is the detailed analysis of companies and their future potential, and then over time seeing how those actually play out. Saul’s Knowledge Base has lots of good tips and techniques to aid one’s own analysis. I want to learn how to better perform analysis that will help me predict the future of companies.
But, as Saul even admitted (http://discussion.fool.com/this-is-not-to-say-you-ignored-the-fi… ), NKTR was not chosen based on Knowledge Base criteria, but on the story. Please correct me if I’m wrong, but I couldn’t find any posts about NKTR’s rapidly growing earnings or recurring revenue or substantial insider ownership or rapidly growing revenue. Is anyone here looking at its Cash Flow, Operating Margins, or P/FCF ratio, as outlined in the KB?
From the KB: I invest not based on knowledge about the industry, but on the fundamentals and progress of the company itself.
and
I usually won’t touch a “story” company that is losing money, but that “will break even two years from now,” no matter HOW enticing the story is.
But, Nektar seems to be an exception.
Now, look, don’t get me wrong. Story stocks are really hard to resist, especially when they’re in your wheelhouse. My biggest percentage investment right now is a Story Stock - one that is shunned by this board (although some here admit to owning it). I’ve made a CAGR of over 40% on my initial investment in it 7 years ago, but in hindsight I was lucky. Since the company’s business is in my recent wheelhouse, I have had confidence to add to that investment, at higher prices, but with stronger convictions. But, I acknowledge that maybe those convictions aren’t well placed - and that’s the danger of a story stock, and I think one’s own over-confidence if the industry is one you think you know well.
And, if we’re being honest with ourselves, isn’t that what is happening here with NKTR? We have people in or near the “industry” analyzing the news and results and potential. Luckily, we have some knowledgeable contrary voices as well. But, at the end of the day, haven’t those here who are invested in NKTR basing their investments on the STORY and not the FINANCIALS? If so, that goes against the Knowledge Base.
I don’t speak for Saul, of course, but my view of Saul’s recent doubling of his position, then selling all that he added a few days later was him recognizing that Nektar is a story stock, and that he’d rather own a stock that meets his KB criteria instead (which is what he essentially, in my opinion, stated here: http://discussion.fool.com/nektar-where-i-stand-currently-330931… ). Indeed, when I look at the history of NKTR in Saul’s portfolio since Nov 2017, the oscillating pattern that emerges echos what I see as Saul’s struggle with the Story versus the Financials. Again, let me be clear that this is what I am interpreting, and is not necessarily what is actually going on inside Saul’s head.
So this is a valuable lesson for me. Nektar’s story is still being told, but The Saul Method does not help us predict the future for it. I will now go back and look at the Story Stocks I currently own and challenge my conviction in the story and what percentage of my portfolio I want to commit to those stories.