PLTR: Is it time to go short?

The valuation is very stretched. Below is the expected revenue growth

|Column 1 | Column 2 |
|— | — | — | —|
|2024 | 2.8 |
|2025 | 3.5 |
|2026 | 4.2 |
|2027 | 5.2 |

Current market cap is $155 B, that is 30 x revenue for 2027, that is another 3 year away. However, earlier the stock was hot and shorting it is burning money. Now the stock seems to be have broken and breached the 50 day moving average. The stock has potential to “fill the gap” or visit $50.

@pauleckler time to buy some put spreads!!!

2 Likes

The analyst reported on CNBC estimated fair value is $60/share given current earnings. We shall see if that support level holds.

Stock has growth potential but seems to be bid up too high. We hope for more orderly growth.

I have modeled 25% growth over next 7 years and termina 30% net profit, that will result in $3.8 B net income and modeling 5% dilution (currently it is 6.8%), you are getting $1.2 EPS, that is on year 2031. I am not arguing it will not trade with high multiples, but lot is baked into the price.

I am thinking of either a call spread, or put spread with some defined risk and at least 3x payout expiring Feb 7th, 3rd is earnings.

1 Like

Be careful.

They are putting together a consortium of a few companies to bid on defense contracts.

I have factored those things. There are lot of hype around 20m project wins… They are not going to get Lockheed Martin kind of $100’s of billions contracts.

In any case, my spread have defined risks and generally these bets are for $1 K or $2K. That is like .2% of my trading account.

Shorting high growth companies is risky.

Mr. Market will give PLTR high valuations expecting that price will grow into valuations. There are $Trillions sitting on the sidelines and will go to high growth companies as fed cuts.

The danger is that you may be right in your thesis but still lose on the trade. I am in a similar situation with RKLB.

1 Like

I guess you haven’t really read my post :slight_smile: I am going to place either call spread or put spread, both defines risk and it is going to be around .2% of my trading capital.

Separately, in a silicon valley 3 or 5 young kids working in a garage coming up with a product that can achieve 10x functionality improvement or 10 x cost reduction is feasible. For a company that is serving enterprise customers for 20 years, is not going to achieve that kind of velocity. There is one $NVDA. Folks imagining that $PLTR revenue is going to go 10x in 2 to 3 years and valuing company like that are going to be disappointed. Today the company is valued over 55x of revenue not earnings. What kind of growth is embedded in that?

Again, The stock had a huge run and it is breaking and I am going to place a defined risk, short-duration, just post earnings spread trade.

Never is the time to go short. Shorting has a terrible risk profile, limited upside, unlimited downside. Options are a better, safer alternative. In addition to spreads, covered calls can work as well or better which is what I’m doing.

The first thing to determine is whether Palantir is a company with a future. If not, sell.

If the stock keeps falling one can get cash from selling calls that expire worthless effectively reducing the stock’s cost basis. The option’s delta says that you cannot get enough cash to match the stock’s fall but it sure mitigates the volatility. The strike price needs to be high enough not to sell at too much of a loss. That is the limiting factor

The Captain

PS: So far two call trades have reduced my PLTR cost basis by 10.8%. If the latest calls are assigned I make net 9.3% in under two months.

4 Likes