Rural broadband progress

We have seen threads on 'the myth of government inefficiency and we have read about the political quagmire of California’s high-speed rail project.

As part of the 2021 infrastructure bill $42 billion was allocated to provide broadband access to rural areas. So far there have been zero connections.

In a podcast, NYT writer Ezra Kline explains to Jon Stewart (who slowly loses his mind) the process. The video follows this transcript.

We have to issue the notice for opportunity for 180 days; that’s step one. Step two, which all 56 applicants completed, is for states who want to participate must submit a letter of intent.

After they do that they can submit a request of up to $5 million in planning grants. Then the NTIA [National Telecommunication and Information Administration] step four, has to review and approve and award planning grants – not broadband grants but planning grants.

Alright, so the NTIA must issue a request, states who are going to participate must submit their letter of intent and request of planning money. All 56 applicants have passed through step five.

Step five: States must submit a five-year action plan. They go back, think about how they are going to do this. And they don’t just say “Thank you for the money. We’re going to spend it, and you can see how it worked out later.”

Then the FCC must publish the broadband data maps before the NTIA allocates funds. Having done all of the above, the Federal government has to put forward a map saying where it thinks be need rural broadband subsidies, and then the states need an opportunity to challenge the map for accuracy. You can imagine this doesn’t all happen in a day.

So then the NTIA, step seven, has to use the FCC maps to make allocation decisions.

Then, having already done their letter of intent, their request for planning grants – I think this one is actually quite amazing – step eight is the states must submit an initial proposal to the NTIA.

Step nine: NTIA must review and approve each state’s initial proposal.

Step 10: States must publish their own maps and allow internal challenges.

I want to say something because it’s very important I say this. This is how liberal government works now. This is a bill, passed by Democrats, with a regulatory structure written by a Democratic administration.

Step 11: The NTIA must review and approve the challenge results and the final map. We’ve lost nine of the applicants at this point.

Step 12: States must run a competitive sub-granting process. We have now lost 17 more applicants, so 30 out of 56 have completed step 12.

Step 13: States must submit a final proposal, and we are down to three out of 56.

Step 14: The NTIA must review and approve the state’s final proposal. In summary, states are nearly at the finish line.

DB2

7 Likes

Zero? zero. I think you have that completely wrong. I received fiber to the home about a year ago and so did my neighbors so I think it is more than zero.

Ok all states have to submit a letter of intent and 56 completed it? Somehow I think the math is off here.

So how did I get fiber to the home last year when the Telephone company told me 5 years ago that I wouldn’t see it because I live in an area that does not have enough density to make it profitable?

7 Likes

There have been expansions of existing services (some 13 million people) as well as multiple government programs. For example, this report from Louisiana says that the state is only one of three (mentioned by Klein) to complete the multistep process to receive BEAD (Broadband Equity Access and Deployment) funding. That program, “Gumbo 2.0”, is one of three different ones the article mentions.

However, you’re missing the points of the podcast about the complexity.

“The Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment (BEAD) Program provides $42.45 billion to expand high-speed Internet access by funding planning, infrastructure deployment and adoption programs in all 50 states, Washington D.C., Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands.”

DB2

4 Likes

You’re missing the point. When you say zero and then people have received it, well that is more than zero. It’s just like saying 56 completed it when you are talking about states when we know there are only 50 states. It just makes your whole article sloppy and makes me discount it completely. Especially when you are saying that 3 states have now made it through the process.

We all know that it would be better to streamline all the processes. There should be a happy medium where we do not get problems like Flint Michigan where a Republican Governor poisoned the whole town. But I would rather have more regulation than be poisoned.

6 Likes

I did a lot of government contracting back in the day, and I’m convinced that about 25%-50% of the cost of any government project is complying with rules designed to prevent waste, fraud, and abuse.

7 Likes

It is hard to picture rural areas in Washington, DC. But then again, there was that $5 million for planning purposes…

DB2

3 Likes

in related news, here and NOW

2 Likes

It isn’t necessarily rural areas. It is for areas that are unserved/underserved by broadband access. Locations on the map with a red dot have no broadband, for example.

It probably isn’t too tough to figure out how to supply broadband to those locations in DC. Now do the same exercise for tribal areas of New Mexico.

3 Likes

I don’t know if it is connected but Live Oak Fiber is building here at an incredible pace. They have multiple sub contractors drilling multiple millions of feet of conduit into the ground. They have contractors from Georgia, Tennessee, and Alabama working the Florida panhandle. They must be loaded with cash, one of their contractors owes multiple utility operators many thousands of dollars for damages. I heard from other contractors that they owe the city of Panama City Beach $100,000. I know they owe AT&T distribution for multiple cuts, they might be responsible for an AT&T transmission line cut in Destin. That would be a very large expense as the cost is not just the cost of repair, but also the cost of lost transmission. That adds up fast when you are dropping bits from most of the cell sites in the county, along with backbone internet data and military circuits. OUCH! That’ll leave a mark on your balance sheet!

I think Live Oak Fiber is a name to watch, either they have serious big money behind them (rumors that Blackrock is involved) or they will be an interesting financial disaster.

Cheers
Qazulight

1 Like

We have lots of fiber being installed in my area too. Mostly companies offering higher speed and more capacity in suburbs. Probably not federally funded.

In my suburban town, they are still working to get high speed internet to the far reaches of the town. City money. I don’ t think any federal money.

Companies are investing where they have enough business. Low customer areas are still a problem. Dial up is almost painful to use. Cell service spotty. Satelite slow on the upload. Musk Starlite possible?

The last administration denied a Starlink contract back in 2022.

FCC concluded that Starlink failed to show it could meet its obligations to provide high-speed internet service to enough rural areas.

A dissent by FCC commissioner Brendan Carr said Starlink needed to show it could provide service to at least 40% of roughly 640,000 rural areas by the end of 2025.

Carr criticized the FCC’s decision, saying the commission “did not require—and has never required—any other award winner to show that it met its service obligation years ahead of time.”

DB2

2 Likes

I agree with that the process may be overly cumbersome. Many lose sight of the fact that this program was never intended to be a wham-bam-thankyou- ma’am project. It was projected to take a decade to complete.

I disagree with the general talking point from the right implying that $42.5 billion has been spent…it hasn’t.

Now with Musk in charge, rural broadbanders with have to pay more for crappier service and slower speeds through Starlink. Progress?

2 Likes

Remembering dial-up… Uh-uh-uh-uh… (shivering in horror)
I started my business 25 years ago on a dial-up connection.
BLEEP-boooo-Urrrrgh-AAAAAAAAA…
I would hate to do that again.
My greatest sympathies go to anyone still on dial-up.

Tax the wealthy, kill dial-up.

2 Likes

Thing is, the cell phone operators want everything to run on their system. The race is on, right now, between pushing ATSC 3.0, to the exclusion of ATSC 1.0, vs shutting down over the air TV entirely, so the cell operators can have all the spectrum.

Steve…remembers when UHF tuners went to channel 83

2 Likes

nobody is on dial up anymore unless they choose to be. Everyone has at least adsl. The reason I state this is, if the telephone companies can provide dial up to your home than they can provide adsl. All it takes is a piece of equipment that all Telephone companies have had since the 2000’s

2 Likes

It’s now a ghetto of old reruns and long geriatric commercials. They’re taking NFL games off soon, too. Have to start watching high school ball from the press box, with Shakey McCameraman.

1 Like

Yes. I know. Best thing on is “Hogan’s Heroes” reruns…MeTV weeknights at 10PM Eastern time.

Really? You promise? That nonsense gone? Yay! Can you get rid of the college games too?

Steve

1 Like

Don’t count out Appalacian Outlaws: The outlaws of Appalachia look for ginseng to make a living. (Cue slide guitar)

Is that running on Defy? They binge a different series each day. They used to run “Forged In Fire”, but that is on “Story” now, every Friday.

If “Defy” or “Story” would run the old, British produced, “Junkyard Wars”, aka “Scrapheap Challenge” I would be all over it.

Steve

1 Like