The Frog Is Dead: North America’s Power Grid Faces Its Biggest Reckoning in a Generation

For much of the 21st century, the North American power sector drifted along on near-zero demand growth. Utilities retired aging coal plants, developers filled interconnection queues with wind and solar, and investors looked elsewhere for excitement. Then came the data center boom—and seemingly overnight, the industry found itself in a full-blown supply crisis.

In a wide-ranging conversation on The POWER Podcast, S&P Global Energy’s Hill Vaden and Doug Giuffre laid out the forces reshaping electricity markets and why the next year and a half may be the most consequential period for energy investment in decades. Their message was clear: the power sector is growing faster than it can fund, build, or permit new supply, and every player in the market—from hyperscalers to regulators to gas turbine manufacturers—is scrambling to adapt.

A Demand Shock Years in the Making

Vaden, S&P Global Energy’s Executive Director of Energy Capital Insights, framed the crisis with a vivid metaphor. For more than a decade, he suggested, the industry has been slowly retiring baseload generation while adding population at roughly one percent a year and building intermittent renewables without the dispatchable generation needed to back them up. The temperature, so to speak, kept rising—and then data centers arrived all at once.

“The water’s boiling, the frog is dead, and now industry is having to respond, and having to respond quickly,” he said.

Giuffre, the firm’s Executive Director of North American Power Markets Analysis, put numbers to the disruption. Just a few years ago, 10-year load growth projections sat below one percent annually. Today, S&P Global Energy’s forecasts call for two-and-a-half to three percent growth or higher. In Ohio alone, he noted, data centers are visible across the Columbus metropolitan area, with a wave of new facilities set to hit the grid within three to four years. At least two percent growth, he said, is very real. The question is how much higher it goes.

Crucially, data centers are not the only driver. Reshoring of industrial manufacturing, continued electrification of transportation, and growing air-conditioning loads in warming climates are all compounding the demand picture.

The Great Gas Turbine Revival

Perhaps the most dramatic market signal is the sudden resurgence of natural gas. After years when gas-fired generation attracted little investor attention, 2025 saw a cyclical high of 43 GW in U.S. gas turbine orders. “We haven’t seen those type of numbers in 20 years from the last merchant power boom in the early 2000s,” Giuffre said.

Nuclear: Broad Support, Hard Realities

Nuclear energy enjoys rare bipartisan political backing, checking the boxes for both clean-energy advocates and those prioritizing firm, reliable generation. In the near term, the actionable levers are plant restarts and capacity uprates. S&P Global Energy estimates more than 5 GW of uprate potential across the existing fleet, with 1 to 2 GW of announcements already on the books.

Vaden was candid about the longer-term challenge: equity financing for advanced nuclear concepts flows freely, but project financing remains much harder to secure. Government support, such as the Department of Energy’s billion-dollar loan commitment for the Crane Energy Center—that is, the Three Mile Island restart—will be essential. So will streamlining what Vaden described as a somewhat Byzantine approval process. “It’s harder to build a nuclear power plant than it is to build a nuclear power point presentation,” he quipped.

Small modular reactors and advanced designs remain a post-2030 story, and both experts noted that many things must go right—especially on the regulatory front—for those ambitions to become reality.

Geothermal, Batteries, and the Innovation Edge

Battery storage deployment hit a record in 2025, and the trend shows no signs of slowing. Hyperscalers signing hybrid power purchase agreements (PPAs)—solar paired with storage—has become a dominant contracting pattern, and Giuffre expects that trend to accelerate.

Advanced geothermal drew enthusiasm from both speakers. Vaden highlighted Fervo Energy’s Nevada project and Sage Geosystems’ work in Texas, where shale-era drilling science is being applied to geothermal wells. However, a geographic mismatch complicates things: the strongest geothermal resources sit in the West, while the largest data center loads are concentrating in the East.

Renewables Still Competitive, but the Landscape Has Shifted

Federal policy changes under the Trump administration have meaningfully altered the outlook for wind and solar. The accelerated phase-out of Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) tax credits has prompted S&P Global Energy to lower its deployment forecasts for both technologies. Onshore wind, already facing rising local opposition before any policy changes, is entering a particularly difficult stretch that could last two to three years, according to Giuffre.

Dramatic cost declines in solar panels and batteries mean that the economics of solar-plus-storage work in many markets even without subsidies, a testament, he said, to the innovation cycle that public incentives were designed to catalyze. “That’s the way subsidies work—they help to incubate an industry, and then they are withdrawn. And we may be getting to that point in some of these technologies,” said Vaden.

The Affordability Collision Course

Giuffre flagged what he called the affordability question or crisis as the issue most likely to generate unpredictable policy responses. As electricity costs rise, he warned, states with deep decarbonization ambitions may be forced to backtrack on some commitments to ease the rate burden on consumers. “We will see some political compromises to address affordability,” Giuffre predicted.

What to Watch Over the Next 18 Months

Asked to identify the trends they would be tracking most closely, each expert offered distinct picks.

Vaden highlighted two. First, the natural gas fuel cell market, which he sees as a potentially significant behind-the-meter play for high-margin hyperscaler customers. Second, he predicted a wave of initial public offerings (IPOs) from innovative energy companies—geothermal developers, small modular reactor firms, and distributed generation players—seeking to access public capital markets over the course of 2026.

Giuffre kept his focus on affordability and its downstream policy effects. He warned that states rolling back energy-efficiency investments to manage near-term rate increases could set the stage for even higher costs later, and that capacity market price ceilings risk discouraging the very investment the grid urgently needs.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Read the whole article yo see all the other information.

Jak

How are grid improvements paid for? If by utilities they probably expect return on investment and state approval to include in their rate base. That couples improvements to demand. You expect that to be slow. No wonder it takes years.

What can be done to get it done faster. Merely adopting green energy requires grid capacity in new areas. This problem has been obvious a long time before AI.

I have a line item on my electric bill that’s labeled “Transmission” I guess that means grid? It’s 19.9% of the total charge.

There are two items on most electric bills: Transmission & Distribution

The North American Power Grid — which is actually a patchwork of five smaller interconnections — is considered by some to be the biggest machine humanity has ever created. The U.S. alone contains 600,000 miles of transmission lines and 5.5 million miles of distribution lines (those black wires that feed power to your home).

Distribution lines are easy to finance. They usually get installed when a customer wants power. And distance short–to the closest substation.

Utility anticipates areas w growing need and installs capacity.

Quite different w major users like data centers and long distances. Also for wind or solar far from existing grid. Major investment required. Will it be profitable?