Control Panel: Iran War: 2026 and 1973

The Iran attack was not exactly a surprise since the U.S. has been moving significant naval forces toward Iran for weeks. Not to mention that the recent negotiations failed.

Iran threatened to block the Straits of Hormuz. It’s possible that the Houthis will threaten shipping in the Red Sea.

This reminds me of the OPEC oil price shock of 1973 which triggered major inflation in the late 1970s. A significant difference is that the U.S. is currently energy-independent. However, oil prices are impacted by worldwide supply so it’s possible that the U.S. could also see a rise in oil price and inflation.

An energy-driven inflation spike could be a long-lasting Macroeconomic trend change. The Federal Reserve will surely take this into account when debating the fed funds rate. History would not be kind to a Fed that cut interest rates just as a potentially inflationary shock hit the markets.

The market has been front-running this risk as shown by the gradual increase in VIX. The price of oil and the energy index have been climbing for months.

It’s possible that the situation will fall back to the status quo. The Iranians will move their second-rank hard-liners into the recently vacated positions. The U.S. is running out of weaponry and can’t (hopefully won’t try to) enter a war of attrition.

https://www.wsj.com/world/middle-east/u-s-races-to-accomplish-iran-mission-before-munitions-run-out-c014acbc?mod=WSJ_home_supertoppertop_pos_5

U.S. Races to Accomplish Iran Mission Before Munitions Run Out

Trump says the Iran campaign might last a week or longer, but dwindling stockpiles could limit his options

By Michael R. Gordon
and Shelby Holliday, The Wall Street Journal, March 1, 2026


The precise size of the U.S. stock of air-defense interceptors—what the Pentagon calls magazine depth—is classified. But repeated conflicts with Iran and its proxies in the Middle East have been eating into the supply of air defenses in the region.

Since Saturday morning Tehran time, the U.S. and its allies in the region have pounded an array of leadership and military targets in the country, including Iran’s missile launchers, drones and airfields. One reason the U.S. and Israel struck first, a senior official said Saturday, was to blunt Iran’s ability to retaliate with its missiles and drones.

It isn’t yet clear how long the strikes will need to last. … [end quote]

The trends in Treasury yields, VIX and gold have all shown increased Fear. The trade is risk-off as the 10 year Treasury price has risen relative to SPX and junk bonds. Junk bond spreads are rising as zombie debt matures into a higher-yield environment, increasing risk of default.

The so-called “Saas-copalyse” affects stocks as well as bonds. The fear that AI will cut the SaaS field off at the ankles has caused a deep plunge in the price of SaaS stocks. Since SaaS companies are heavily indebted with junk ratings the private lenders are also losing confidence. A lot of “zombie” debt will need to be rolled over at higher interest rates. Many of these bonds are “covenant-lite” which means the companies were allowed to borrow heavily regardless of prior borrowing.

SPX has been stable but this hides an extraordinary amount of trading under the surface.

Market Internals

By Scott Rubner, Citadel Securities, February 18, 2026

Retail participation remains historically elevated, ETF flows are tracking at one of the strongest early-year paces on record, and liquidity has thinned during episodic selloffs. At the same time, AI-driven disruption narratives have accelerated repricing across vulnerable business models, intensifying rotation even as headline performance remains contained.

The speed of the recent factor rotation has translated directly into elevated dispersion. Single-stock dispersion is at extreme levels**. Over the past 30 days, the S&P 500 is down 1.4%, while the average stock in the index has moved 10% in absolute terms, placing the 8.6% dispersion spread in the 97th percentile over the past three decades.** Earlier this month, this spread surged to 10.8% – a 99th percentile event and a 3.5σ outlier over the past thirty years…

Importantly, part of this resilience appears reactive, particularly in sectors that have borne the brunt of recent factor moves. Software is the clearest example – as the group has come under pressure, retail investors have leaned aggressively into the weakness, driving flows decisively into single-stock software names…[end quote]

Translating this into plain English, the market average has been steady but the price of individual stocks and ETFs have been swinging much more than usual. It’s like a duck swimming calmly on a lake but the feet paddling like crazy under the water.

“Liquidity has thinned” means that investors want to sell but there aren’t enough buyers so the price dropped. This is characteristic of past bubbles.

Institutional investors have dumped SaaS stocks but retail investors have seen the lower prices as a bargain and have been backing up the truck to buy. The sellers think that AI can replace a huge part of SaaS business. The buyers think the customers are locked in to the SaaS software and AI would improve profits.

I expect a wild opening in the markets tomorrow. The futures markets (according to Gemini) are already predicting a rise in the oil and gold price and a fall in Treasury yields. The oil majors and defense contractors will probably see moves. @HohumYNWA has already told METAR about the rise in shipping prices which will impact inflation.

I’m going to keep an eye on the Financial Stress and MOVE indexes which track the bond market and liquidity. A spike in VIX and these indexes together is a sure sign of a financial crisis which is different than a stock market crash and far more dangerous. I don’t expect that at this time and the data needs to be updated to be useful.

The METAR for next week is stormy.

Wendy

11 Likes

IT WASN’T OPEC! It was the ARAB members of OPEC.

When will people get it right?

Google AI:

You are correct. The 1973-1974 oil embargo was not a decision made by the entire OPEC organization, but specifically by the

Arab members of OPEC (OAPEC).

Here is the breakdown of that distinction:

  • Who Did It: The Organization of Arab Petroleum Exporting Countries (OAPEC) announced the embargo on October 17, 1973, in response to Western support for Israel during the Yom Kippur War.
  • The Key Players: Led by Saudi Arabia, the Arab members included Iraq, Kuwait, Libya, and the UAE.
  • The Distinction: Non-Arab OPEC members—such as Iran, Venezuela, Indonesia, and Nigeria—did not participate in the embargo. In fact, Iran continued to produce and export oil throughout the five-month embargo.
  • The Misconception: While the embargo is often referred to as the “OPEC oil embargo” it was specifically an action of the Arab member states.

The Arab oil ministers cut production and specifically targeted the United States, the Netherlands, Portugal, and South Africa with a total embargo.

Venezuela was more than happy to continue selling oil to all takers.

The Captain

8 Likes

Except 7 Arab states are being bombed right now.

Iran loves to make friends!

The Captain

3 Likes

I am sure the Iranian Revolutionary Guard can depend on Yemen and Syria.

That is my sarcasm quota for the day. I need a bigger quota.

Current headline reads new Iranian leadership is open to talks.

Will wonders never cease?

How to win friends and influence people.

Iran BOMBS NATO Base in Abu Dhabi- French Naval Base BOMBED By Iran’s Shahed Drones
https://www.oneindia.com/videos/iran-bombs-nato-base-in-abu-dhabi-french-naval-base-bombed-by-iran-s-shahed-drones-nato-enters-war-4290954.html
A naval base in Abu Dhabi that hosts French military personnel has been hit. According to the UAE Ministry of Defence, two Iranian drones struck Al Salam Naval Base, also known as Peace Camp, setting part of the facility on fire.

France has ordered its nuclear-powered aircraft carrier, the Charles de Gaulle, to cut short its deployment in the North Atlantic and Baltic Sea and head immediately toward the Eastern Mediterranean…The move follows an emergency session of the Defense and National Security Council convened by President Emmanuel Macron at the Élysée Palace on Sunday…

Earlier in the day, Macron stated that France was “neither informed nor involved” in the initial U.S.-Israeli strikes. However, subsequent Iranian retaliatory attacks on Gulf states, including a strike on the Al-Salam Naval Base in Abu Dhabi, prompted a French military response.

DB2

3 Likes

And then…

DB2

4 Likes

The Iranian bombing of French, English, Saudi, etc. forces makes as much sense as going to war in Iraq after the World Trade Center was destroyed by Saudi nationals operating out of Afghanistan under the Al Quaeda banner.

Wendy

10 Likes

@WendyBG

There is the regime’s main perspective. The regime has supported violence all along against Arabs.

The Israelis are vocal about Iran. But the Arabs have lost 1 million lives. Israel is protecting them with us. I feel very good about this.

I remember similar sentiments being expressed over the post 9/11 invasion of Iraq and the jubilation expressed over the early “successes”.

I cannot help asking “What next?” and absolutely not feeling good about any of this.

9 Likes

….and now I’m in reminiscences mode. During one of my weekly phone calls with my folks at round the time of the first Gulf War. What was it…Desert Shield/Desert Storm? Dad was in tears at the unnecessary loss of life that he was witnessing on TV (images that in England at the time might’ve been a bit different than I was eyeballing here in the US) He said something that I’ve recalled ever since…..that, when you’re spoiling for a fight, it’s dead easy to make the other bloke look like the aggressor.

Now, he was an actual veteran of WWII…..who volunteered in 1939 before conscription officially started, and probably did so out of patriotic zeal, in all likelihood. I can honestly say that, as much as he’d chortle at crass jokes about the fondness the French have for surrender, and the Italian tanks with one forward and five reverse gears….and mention that he’d been shot at and bombed more times by American troops than by German….I don’t recall him ever uttering anything other than near-pacifist sentiments. Looking at events leading up to and what happened after any event.

4 Likes

Two different wars. Iraq had done very little wrong, other than entering Kuwait years earlier.

Tehran had been a larger part of one million dead Arabs.

I think Trump might screw it up. No surprise there if he does.

But this is a dirty job that, at least for the next few months, needs doing.

People here should realize none of this is suddenly new.

1 Like

From our perspective, maybe.

But if you are a heavily armed radical under threat of death in Iran, it makes sense to make it as difficult as possible for your opponent. A region-wide war would be a great outcome for them.

And boots on the ground? A wet dream.

The rationale (being kind here) for this action changes with the wind. It was not well thought out. I’m hoping for, but not expecting, a good outcome.

6 Likes

Another likely possibility is that with Iranian command and control seriously degraded isolated units led by radical commanders (IRGC) are acting independently ==> no overall strategy.

DB2

2 Likes

…are carrying out their pre-written and martyrdom planned “in case the Leader and/or Center of Command are dead or unreachable, what follows are standing battle orders and the targets you are commanded to hit to avenge the dead and prepare the way for the great final victory.

That is the nature of rationales in Middle Eastern history. There were massive problems for us with the regime. They wanted 20% enrichment. The regime wanted ballistic missiles that could eventually hit us. The regime was exporting if you are not Muslim enough, you die. Meaning Arabs were paying a heavy price with their lives.

This is not a sudden matter.

The problem with us? We on the left are going to get back into power and not do anything. Our popularity might drop. That is no way to straighten things out.

Some intellectual got on NPR today to discuss, “We could have used sanctions”. He is an idiot; the Iranians have faced sanctions for decades.

1 Like

The Guard is trying to hold on to power. Hold on to their country.

Our forces will bomb until they cave in.

The fewer deaths in Iran the better. We won’t alienate the Iranian public. No boots on the gournd compared to other wars because we have the reach. I do not know if there will be special ops, but no army or marines.

1 Like

The Iron Beam Laser was used for the first time.

1 Like

Seems to be the issue on both sides.

5 Likes