Control Panel: Black swan trend change?

Many METARs are old enough to remember the 1973 Arab oil embargo, the stagflation and stock market rout that it caused. Here is the Inflation Adjusted S&P 500 which shows how the SPX declined for a decade after 1970 with nasty drawdowns in 1973 and 1974. Investors who blithely say that they plan to ride out drawdowns may not survive to see the turn back up to a rising SPX.

Will the “black swan” attack on Iran cause a similar trend change in a U.S. economy that has good growth, already slowing employment, stubborn (but low by historic standards) and a stock market in a historic bubble?

It’s really too early to tell but that doesn’t keep analysts from trying.

https://www.wsj.com/economy/why-the-oil-shock-probably-wont-derail-the-economy-and-one-way-it-might-c8603382?mod=hp_lead_pos2

Why the Oil Shock Probably Won’t Derail the Economy. And One Way It Might.

The U.S. is a net petroleum exporter and productivity is improving, but the bigger risk is stubborn inflation

By Greg Ip, The Wall Street Journal, March 8, 2026

It was an ugly week for the economy.

Oil prices surged 39%, all but guaranteeing inflation is about to lurch higher. And it came amid emerging signs of jobs weakness, as payrolls fell and unemployment rose in February.

Those with long memories smell stagflation—a troubling mix of stagnant growth and stubborn inflation—or worse, recession. Higher oil prices helped sink the economy in 1973, 1980, 1990 and 2008…

Higher oil prices are like a tax, cutting into household consumption while boosting inflation and interest rates.

But that effect has shrunk as the U.S. became less energy dependent. The U.S. consumed 4% less gasoline in 2025 than in 2007, while producing 42% more goods and services (as measured by gross domestic product, adjusted for inflation). …

Prolonged closure of the Strait of Hormuz could send oil prices much higher than the market anticipates…

A financial crackup is another risk. The AI boom, credited for driving growth last year and likely this year, is closely intertwined with bubbly stock valuations. Energy turmoil could unnerve investors already worried about how much tech companies are spending on data centers… [end quote]

Nobody knows yet how long the attacks on Iran will last or how long oil traffic will be stalled in the Strait of Hormuz considering that Iran’s leaders may remain hard-line anti-U.S.

The stock indexes are down and VIX is up but not showing panic. The Fear & Greed Index is in Fear but not Extreme Fear.

The markets aren’t running to buy “risk-off” assets like Treasuries and USD. USD is near the top of its recent channel but not as high as pre-2024. Treasury prices actually fell instead of rising as they usually do during a period of fear. This may reflect increased inflation expectations and/ or a reduced confidence in U.S. Treasuries due to higher than expected spending. Probably the latter since the 10 Year TIPS yield (which removes the inflation concern) was higher.

The trade is risk-off because stock and junk bond prices fell more than Treasury prices even though they fell in tandem. Junk bonds are falling which shows the market is concerned about defaults in a potential recession but also because many zombie companies (including SaaS companies) are being forced to refinance ultra-low interest loans.

Oil is trending sharply higher. Natgas spiked but then fell back to its recent level. Gold and silver spiked and fell in early February. Gold is climbing back toward its record peak but silver has stabilized.

Economic activity in the manufacturing sector expanded in February for the second straight month but only the third time in 40 months, say the nation’s supply executives in the latest ISM® Manufacturing PMI® Report. Three demand indicators (the New Orders, Backlog of Orders and New Export Orders indexes) are in expansion, and the Customers’ Inventories Index remains in ‘too low’ territory, contracting at a slightly slower rate. A ‘too low’ status for the Customers’ Inventories Index is usually considered positive for future production. The overall economy continued in expansion for the 16th month.

Economic activity in the services sector continued to expand in February, say the nation’s purchasing and supply executives in the latest ISM® Services PMI® Report. The Services PMI® registered 56.1 percent, its 20th month in a row in expansion territory. The services sector is heating up, with the Business Activity, New Orders, and New Export Orders indexes at their highest levels since 2024, and the Backlog of Orders Index with its best reading since July 2022.

Since Services comprise 80% of the economy this is a strong reading.

The Atlanta Fed’s Latest GDPNow Estimate for 2026:Q1 is 2.1%. This is a sharp decline from earlier estimates. The reason is a sharp contraction in “Consumer Spending (PCE).” I don’t understand this because PCE is growing strongly. Maybe they are seeing preliminary numbers that are showing a contraction?

The Cleveland Fed’s Inflation Nowcasting predicts 1Q26 PCE inflation over 3% which is rising. The Atlanta Fed’s collection of Underlying Inflation is improved over the past year but still showing a lot of red.

The options market sees little chance that the Federal Reserve will cut the fed funds rate before June. Since Fed Chair Jerome Powell will rotate out of the chairmanship in May this indicates that the markets are betting that his replacement, Kevin Warsh, will not try to force the fed funds rate lower despite pressure from President Trump. The fed funds rate is set by a committee, FOMC, and there would be fierce pushback against political manipulation.

Only a sudden crisis or distinct recession would cause the FOMC to cut the fed funds rate when inflation is increasing like it will be with the Iran oil shock. Even then they would be in a stagflationary box. History would be unkind to an FOMC that repeated the 1970s.

The METAR for next week is unsettled and rather stormy but not a hurricane. Yet.

Wendy

https://www.statista.com/statistics/1404145/us-dollar-index-historical-chart/

https://www.ismworld.org/supply-management-news-and-reports/reports/ism-pmi-reports/pmi/february/

https://www.ismworld.org/supply-management-news-and-reports/reports/ism-pmi-reports/services/february/

https://www.cmegroup.com/markets/interest-rates/cme-fedwatch-tool.html

10 Likes

Thank you!

The US needs to replace the munitions expended in Iran. Wouldn’t that improve the economy?

The Captain

2 Likes

Depends on how it’s paid for. 3 options:

  1. increase taxes (ha ha, I made a funny)

  2. take funding from other programs (rob Peter to pay Paul)

  3. add it to our ever expanding national debt (along with the associated interest payments)

11 Likes

This is the story of the day, but

The tariffs are more pressing. They are not gone.

For now there is a bump in profits for the companies that will get their money back from the last set of illegal tariffs. But the new tariffs are still onorus.

J6P is paying, and his jobs are disappearing. The spiral is coming. Deflation and unemployment. The stench of it is entering the air.

Uhmmm, us METARites? What you called cr*p is the foundational purpose and bread and butter of this Board, and so maybe you should, you know, move along and find some Prime Boef for yourself and stop taking up space here?

16 Likes

Wow

I think all of us are fed up with the current events. Everyone’s nest egg is at risk.

IAG was a lawyer I believe. Econ might not be his thing. The OP has things that miss the mark, where is this going? It is a long read or a shaggy dog story. That is why I brought up the tariffs. We need a detailed analysis there.

1 Like

Lawyers are not excused from needing a fundamental level of civility. IAG likely needs it. Sure, “Sunday morning blues” and the world going ever more obviously insane excuses a lot, but not cr*ping all over a weekly report that is foundational to the board.

4 Likes

I wasn’t talking civility. I was referring to huge paperwork demands, but he is not as attuned to economics. Frankly I skipped much of the post. I do not blame the Iran actions for much. I have looked at the charts elsewhere, and I have heard some of the economics news elsewhere.

If @ImAGolfer feels that “Econ might not be his thing” then he should not be hanging out on a Macroeconomics board. Much less speaking rudely and offensively to the person who puts hours of effort into gathering Macroeconomic information – such rudeness being a violation of board policy.

Wendy

16 Likes

Put that way, I do agree.

But I need to stop speaking for him. Perhaps he’d explain himself.

I kind of think it is ironic for a lawyer not to do some reading. LOL

I will go back to all of us should be on edge right now. This economy is on edge.

You can actually write out the word and complete the sentence: “Who is going to read all this crisp analysis?” Right? That’s rhetorical, I assume, since we all do.

Pete

6 Likes

That’s actually the basis of the 4% rule for retirement withdrawals. It’s the withdrawal rate that survived the worst 30-year payout periods in economic history (i.e., crash of 1929 and Great Depression, poor returns and stagflation of 1965 to 1995). Of course, if you don’t happen to retire on the eve of the next Great Depression, the 4% rule is likely to leave you wealthy.

Long-term buy & hold over the last 30-years has left you with a 20-fold increase in your wealth.

It’s the people who attempt to read the tea leaves and time the market that I worry about.

intercst

4 Likes

First of all, Wendy puts a lot of time into selecting a broad set of current macroeconomics topics to present. She isn’t paid to do this and her time is finite. If she doesn’t cover one of your pet topics (e.g. tariffs), it’s because she selected what she thought was most important. If you think you could do a better, more complete job - go for it, otherwise don’t waste our time reading your pointing out that she didn’t do twice the work she did.

Secondly, to the yokel who said her post is cr*p, if you don’t want to educate yourself to the point that you understand what a gift Wendy’s weekly quotes are, then simply put her on “ignore” and you won’t have to see it.

To business: Europe has been weening itself off of Russian oil by substituting LNG from the Gulf - something that has dried up and the available tankers to bring oil from the US (as well as the ability to receive it) is probably logistically challenged. Hungary and Slovakia come to mind as particularly impacted as Ukraine has recently allowed their supply of Russian oil ti remain impaired.

Anyhow, the European exchanges (as well as some of the Asian exchanges are getting whacked. That export number than was growing is bound to become seriously curtailed in coming months.

The current US administration is unlikely to put a significant number of “boots on the ground” in Iran. That means that their main leverage is to drop massive amounts of munitions into the country. This has some interesting outcomes:

While you can bomb the country until it resembles Gaza, it may backfire and, while the country will lose its ability to militarily challenge our “allies” in the area, it will remain an asymmetrical threat.

It is also eating into our ability to significantly handle China if things get beyond the saber-rattling stage. Munitions companies can’t be expected to build larger factories without iron-clad contracts providing a steady flow of orders at a faster rate than current procurement would dictate.

It is my personal belief that our administration was snookered into this war by assorted gifts and flattery combined with a focused news silo egging it on. If the damage to Gulf oil infrastructure is long-term, the economic fallout of this war may far outweigh its benefits.

Jeff

13 Likes

It would improve the economy more if we weren’t spending taxpayers money on needless wars not in America’s interest.

Or expensive and embarrassing 20-year misadventure in Iraq and Afghanistan cost about $8 Trillion – roughly one-fifth of our $39 Trillion national debt.

intercst

8 Likes

I hardly ever post here anymore, but I look forward to Wendy’s Control Panel every week. Thank you for all the work you put into it, Wendy. And don’t let the haters get you down!

9 Likes

My Telsa app tells me that I’ve spent the princely sum of $61 charging my Model Y off the 110 volt plug in my garage during the 11 months I’ve owned the vehicle. I haven’t needed to charge it anyplace else, so that’s my full cost.

I worry about Americans still fretting over oil prices. There’s a danger that our leaders of both parties will make uneconomic choices.

intercst

3 Likes

Excuse Jeff, but the import of the war on economy is up for debate on this thread. Tariffs are more impactful. This is a discussion.

Also in fairness to yokles everywhere their frogs are coming to a boil in the pot. These should be scary times upon reflection. Id give him the benefit of the doubt that hes have a time of it. He might not be down on the posts content.

The war is for the liberation of the persians, listen to them. The only major human targets are the regimes leaders. The rest of it is inaccurate ranting.

Human wastefulness is unparalleled but thats not the problem. Hes going to default and other nations might follow.

There’s no honor among thieves.

Leap, that does leave me completely baffled. Some optional reading if you want, and reading aint paperwork. And Wendy provided her normal extremely brief but useful “briefs”. Golfer is repeatedly been dismissive of our core discussions here, and I want him to reform or to leave us alone.