For those no longer following the thread

This is what I wrote in a response to Mike, a few posts back:

I do know that whenever I post about BOFI, even with the best of intentions about alerting people, it always turns out badly. I really must be a slow learner about this. I’ll keep my mouth shut. In fact I plan to take BOFI off my stock screens, as I should have done before, so I won’t be tempted to comment. I’m really ready to get back to discussing interesting stocks, instead of wrestling with this.

I truly wish the best to those who have stayed in Bofi, as I consider you all my friends and don’t want any one of you to lose money.

Maybe we can get on to other, more interesting, things now and drop this contentious discussion.

Saul

24 Likes

SaulR80683: Maybe we can get on to other, more interesting, things now and drop this contentious discussion.

The BofI board is pretty dead these days (because all the discussions are here) but if you want to shift all future BofI-related discussions over there, Saul, that sounds like a good way to refocus on what you – and others here – do best.

No doubt Seeking Alpha will be hitting BofI hard with new allegations as year-end approaches but the next important piece of the puzzle, the Erhart declaration, is not due until early January.

Consider this my last word on BofI on this board. Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays to everyone.

5 Likes

Let me be clear. I don’t mind others continuing to discuss Bofi on the board, or any other interesting stock that anyone brings to the board. It’s just that discussing Bofi always turns out badly for ME, so I won’t be participating in any discussions about it.

Saul

1 Like

It’s just that discussing Bofi always turns out badly for ME, so I won’t be participating in any discussions about it.

Yeah, let’s get back to discussing WPRT vs PSIX.

NO WAIT!! I’M JOKING!!! I’M JUST A KIDDER!

That is sort of how this board got started. Saul, discuss whatever you like. This is my go-to board and you posts (and others) have greatly helped my process.

So thanks to all. All happy holidays.

Jeb

3 Likes

http://discussion.fool.com/32013767.aspx?sort=whole#32013767

On Dec. 1, 2015, I suggested the following OP with just a question mark for a headline. My words as you can see for youself in the OP:

http://discussion.fool.com/32013767.aspx?sort=whole#32013767

If you need to vent, do so over there, not here…I did not want to fill up this board with posts about a stock which Saul no longer covers…

The second post in this thread reads:

Well, there’s nothing like dropping a big, nasty one in the punch bowl and then telling everyone else to ignore it.

On Dec. 17th, post no. 14773, Saul was quoted in a thread titled “For those no longer following this stock”

SaulR80683: Maybe we can get on to other, more interesting, things now and drop this contentious discussion.

The same poster who thought it was wrong of me to bring up BOFI with just a question mark and suggest moving all discussion about it to the neutral Macro-Economics anything goes board, Free For All Economics, responded to Saul:

The BofI board is pretty dead these days (because all the discussions are here) but if you want to shift all future BofI-related discussions over there, Saul, that sounds like a good way to refocus on what you – and others here – do best.

No doubt Seeking Alpha will be hitting BofI hard with new allegations as year-end approaches but the next important piece of the puzzle, the Erhart declaration, is not due until early January.

Consider this my last word on BofI on this board. Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays to everyone.

To which I respond with “?”

Got Punch?

2 Likes