Poll Update: Noticed that 4 lurkers (you know who you are!) went back to the poll and retroactively voted that Buffett would buy more OXY shares after the recent update Wednesday showing he had in fact bought an additional $billion worth. That’s not fair. You should be ashamed of yourselves.
Mungo had asked if anybody was coat tailing Buffett on the OXY purchases. I bought a small amount in an IRA this morning @ $56.80. Buffett has recently paid as high as $58.45/share (average). Of course, the 84 million warrants exercise at $59.62. No reason to believe he has stopped his buying. If he were to buy out the firm, he would likely throw in an even higher bid on any remaining shares to sweeten the pot.
We know Warren and Charlie claim they don’t do macro, but given some of their comments recently, on the potential for rising inflation and how valuable and irreplaceable oil and gas are to our society, am wondering if the recent Ukraine war situation played a role in Warren “suddenly” going “bullish” on OXY overnight after listening their recent earnings call.
Perhaps Warren and Charlie are thinking along the same lines as Lynn Alden here:
The Russian Impact on Commodities
"The global economy, in a blank-sheet-of-paper naïve design that disregards the complicating factors of geopolitics, basically says this: we’ll take Chinese labor and logistics infrastructure, Russian and Brazilian commodities, and developed market institutions and capital, and combine them (and resources from similar countries across the spectrum) into full products and services across the world.
Under this operating framework, we don’t need to build secondary manufacturing and shipping facilities, because we assume the ones we have in China will always be available. We don’t need to build secondary nickel mines for our EV batteries, because we assume the ones in Russia will be open and able to supply the world. Chile can supply our copper, Brazil can supply our soybeans, Russia and Ukraine can supply our wheat, Taiwan can supply our semiconductors, China can supply our labor, and there’s no issue here.
All good, right? For decades yes, until it’s not.
Russia is one of the biggest oil and gas exporters in the world. They’re also one of the biggest exporters of wheat, nickel, fertilizer, platinum group metals, enriched uranium, coal, aluminum, and more. It’s challenging for the global economy to function without those mines, in the event of sanctions. And in most cases, it takes several years to discover and build a new mine, in what is an otherwise tightly-balanced global supply/demand system.
Going forward, any back-tests about inflation or disinflation that only go back twenty or thirty years are practically useless. This whole 1980s-through-2010s disinflationary period (with one substantial cyclical inflationary burst in the 2000s) was during a backdrop of structurally falling interest rates and increasing globalization, with the sacrifice of resiliency for more efficiency.
The world is now looking at the need to duplicate many parts of the supply chain, find and develop potentially redundant sources of commodities, hold higher inventories of everything, and in general boost resilience at the cost of efficiency."
https://www.lynalden.com/march-2022-newsletter/