I’m fine with it. Keep the crazies where you can keep an eye on them.
Not sure what this does for ad revenue.
intercst
I’m fine with it. Keep the crazies where you can keep an eye on them.
Not sure what this does for ad revenue.
intercst
Yes, me too. Like Notsee organizations or other racist groups, I don’t want to see them outlawed or silenced. I want to know exactly who these people are.
Pete
Wonder if the court would require part of the ad revenue be paid to his victims (and not paid it him).
The answer to free speech is more free speech.
Another nail in the X coffin.
Further proof that a high IQ is only a sign of intelligence, not the ability to be smart.
You mean smart enough to become the richest person in the world? Or was that just luck?
DB2
This is also good for smoking out the closet racists like the South Carolina state treasurer who had a public meltdown because companies didn’t want their ads appearing next to pro-Hitler content.
Do you think it’s smart to allow a person who promotes false conspiracy theories and was ordered to pay nearly $1 billion in a defamation lawsuit on a website that is trying to attract mainstream advertisers as a source of revenue?
Did you just describe Fox Noise?
Steve
Any company advertising with Twittler’s platform is not a company I will do business with.
I think it is violent and hateful.
The crazies may all be rounded up there on X but it does not make them less violent and hateful. Not that Jones could get his extra-wide rear off a couch to attack the refrigerator without someone giving him a walker.
In other words, the violence part is a Jones invite for the peons.