Estonian Foreign Intelligence Service Re: International Security and Estonia 2026

On 10 January, the war (between Russia - Ukraine) reached its 1,417th day – exactly the same length as the Second World War on the Eastern Front between the Soviet Union and N*** Germany.

In nearly four years, Russia has exhausted most of the military stockpiles it inherited from the Soviet Union, lost around one million soldiers killed or severely injured at the front, and inflicted untold suffering on Ukrainians. And yet Ukraine endures.

Despite Russia’s frustrated efforts, there are no signs of change within the regime’s leadership. Vladimir Putin, the Kremlin’s figurehead, remains convinced that Russia, with its supposedly unique global role, is following a “special path”. Russia therefore continues its pursuit of Ukraine’s complete subjugation.

Through repression, Russia’s ruler has created the illusion that there is no alternative to him – that the choice is between Putin and an abyss of uncertainty. But no one is irreplaceable. The war in Ukraine has brought severe hardship to Russia, and although Russians have cultivated a myth of themselves as masters of suffering, their tolerance for pain is not unlimited. A declining economy, empty fuel tanks, and the return of murderers and rapists from the front are hitting ordinary Russians with increasing force. History shows that when the screws are tightened too far, Russians have at times found the courage to leap into the unknown.

Equally Potemkin-like is the notion of Russia’s omnipotence. What does the Kremlin have to show after almost four years of war? On the one side stand a rearming Europeand a more determinedly independent Ukraine than ever before, recalling the Russian proverb that urges one to measure oneself by the might of one’s enemies. On the other side lie a faltering domestic economy, hundreds of thousands of maimed and traumatised citizens, and ever-deepening repression. This is the true face of the “Russkiy Mir”.

Nor has the Kremlin succeeded in breaking allied unity. Its repeated failures show that Russia’s ruling elite is simply incapable of doing so. Although Russian acts of sabotage and influence efforts do occur, we should not conjure threats where none exist: not every event reflects a cunning plan or the omnipotent hand of the Kremlin – often, it is simply a coincidence.

As for Russia’s own alliances, recent developments involving Iran and Venezuela have made it clear that alignment with Russia offers little benefit. These cases show that Moscow tends to forget its allies in times of need.

Russia remains dangerous despite its incompetence, and vigilance is essential to prevent the expansion of the “Russian World”. While sanctions clearly affect the Russian economy, loopholes remain that must be closed through targeted measures and cooperation among Western countries – whether the issue is the smuggling of dual-use goods to Russia, vulnerabilities in its explosives industry, or the critical technological leaps that NATO will require to counter Russia’s growing reliance on unmanned military systems.

There is, however, no cause for panic. In the Estonian Foreign Intelligence Service’s assessment, Russia has no intention of militarily attacking Estonia or any other NATO member state in the coming year. We are likely to reach a similar assessment next year because Estonia and Europe have taken steps that compel the Kremlin to calculate very carefully what, if anything, it can risk attempting. Even if no such intention exists today, our task is to ensure that this remains the case tomorrow and in the future. Russia’s military reform will enhance the capabilities of its armed forces in the years ahead. To counter this, Estonia and NATO must continue investing in defence. Russia’s calculations of the balance of power must always work to our advantage.

It is firm and steady preparedness that truly deters Russia. By maintaining it, we demonstrate to Russia the qualities it fears most – that we are free, resolute and resilient, and that we make our own choices without coercion or pressure from anyone.

Kaupo Rosin
Director General of the Estonian Foreign Intelligence Service
10 February 2026


US efforts to broker a peace in Ukraine is a waste of time! 
Jaak
9 Likes

More than a year since he returned to the White House vowing to end the Russia-Ukraine War within 24 hours, US President Donald Trump remains upbeat about the prospect of peace. “Very, very good talks today,” Trump stated on February 6 following the latest round of negotiations in Abu Dhabi. “Something could be happening.”

Few in Kyiv share this optimism. While Ukrainian officials are loathe to dismiss Trump’s peace efforts for fear incurring his displeasure, a majority of Ukrainians remain utterly unconvinced that Russian President Vladimir Putin has any interest whatsoever in ending hostilities. A poll conducted by Kyiv’s International Institute of Sociology in late January found that only 20 percent of Ukrainians think the war will end by July, while 43 percent expect fighting to continue into 2027 or beyond.

Such skepticism is easy to understand. Ukraine agreed to an unconditional ceasefire way back in March 2025, but Putin has so far refused to follow suit. Instead, he has spent much of the past year engaging in blatant stalling tactics while constantly moving the diplomatic goalposts in a transparent bid to prevent any progress toward a lasting settlement. This has resulted in what most Ukrainians and many others regard as a phony peace process.

As fruitless US-led negotiations rumble on, Putin has underlined his true intentions by dramatically increasing Russian attacks on the Ukrainian population, leading to a 31 percent surge in civilian casualties during 2025. The most recent escalation saw Russia attempt to freeze millions of Ukrainians in their own homes by systematically bombing critical heating and power infrastructure amid Arctic conditions. Some believe this ruthless winter bombing campaign qualifies as an act of genocide; it is most certainly not the act of a man seeking a compromise peace.

Trump has difficulty reading Putin because he fundamentally misunderstands the motivations behind the Russian invasion of Ukraine. To Trump, the current negotiations are a geopolitical real estate deal, with the Russians playing hardball to secure better terms. In reality, however, Putin is operating on a completely different wavelength altogether.

The Kremlin dictator is not looking to make deals, acquire additional land, or push the Russian border a few hundred kilometers to the west. Instead, he wants to secure his place in history. Putin genuinely believes he is on an historic mission to reverse the injustice of the Soviet collapse and revive the Russian Empire. In order to achieve this, he has convinced himself that he must erase Ukraine as a state and as a nation.

3 Likes